Wow, was there enough criticism to go around for that writer. Did appear they could have used a couple good stay at home dmen, not sure if the 3 the writer says were overlooked would fill that bill or not. Guess we'll never know. I'd assume the organization, which got tons of praise last year, hasn't changed.
May be hard to measure how much the leadership (and play) of Stuart and Parise meant to last year's team.
Suter logged lots of ice time and was no doubt the best defensive dman, but he turned the puck over a multitude of times when trying to rush it up ice, including during the Christmas Day win over the Russians.
Had the US put one of those great chances past Schwartz (sp?) in OT, I'd guess everyone would be happy.