AJS

Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but I don’t believe the plan is for any FR to use their redshirt. I can’t remember the last time that has happened. Finally building depth.

Senior this year.

Blake is leading the USHL in points, Singleton is Top 5 in the AJHL.

Yes, with the possible exception of Baba. Not sure on him.

Very very important win.

Red zone issues aside, an incredible game all around. To do what they did defensively with a lot of injuries was extremely impressive.

Only this team.

The road back starts today! One week at a time!

Nice work NCHC!

Hellsten starts tomorrow and leads them to victory and you might see me singing a different tune.

Yes. UND will improve, but the NCHC looks even tougher than usual. Don’t see them as a home ice team.

Fair, still would like to see what the Freshman has to offer. Driscoll has not proven he can “steal” a game, so tomorrow is a loss with him in net. Maybe Hellsten has that.

Seeing the results of the rest of the NCHC early on and having watched this team, they will be on the road for the first round. Should have went full rebuild. Transfers are ok if they have at least 2 years of eligibility. The one year guys only work if you have a competitive team.

Give Hellsten a chance tomorrow. Driscoll has been average.

No chance they are winning tomorrow. I don’t really know what to say. They are awful. I would like to see the backup goalie play, they aren’t winning either way.

Not competitive, embarrassing to watch.

You would think the CUSA invite would have to be an all sports or none, right? I wouldn't think they would have any interest in a Football only affiliate. Is it sort of a forgone conclusion that IF NDSU was looking for someone to come along for a potential CUSA ride that it would be SDSU? This trickle down is getting very, very interesting. Is there real appeal to be apart of this version of CUSA? Edit: Football affiliate would be on the table for some teams, not all, but some.

By far my favorite lines this year.

Bowen is the last remaining member of the weirdest group of recruits I've ever seen. By group I mean, guys that committed around the same time. You had this collection of guys that all started playing Juniors the same year (I believe) or within a year of each other as Juniors in HS. You don't play USHL / BCHL as a Junior unless you are extremely highly skilled. Reid / Mancinelli / Rizzo / Halliday / Bowen. I don't think I'm missing anyone. Miller, but that's another situation all together. They all had for their age, really solid years. The expectation was that year 2, their draft years that they would all sky rocket. None of them did. Bowen is the only one that's still committed. What's odd about him is his draft year, he had a pretty solid start, but got injured. Since then, his numbers are solid, but he's seemed to have plateaued.

Must split weekend. Hopefully they win on Friday and take some of the pressure off. So far this year, they've very much looked like a team that has 14 new players. You can see the talent, hopefully they start to mesh sooner than later.

I'm not following the negative reaction to the CSS ratings at all. I've always found the 3rd to 5th rounds to be the sweet spot. More likely to get those really solid players that will be 3 year guys. 6 of the 7 are rated. I don't get how there's a negative spin to that.

Central Scouting released their preliminary rankings. No recruits with A or B ratings. C Rating: Ausmus Dunbar James Livanavage Singleton Spicer I believe the only first year eligible recruit that is not listed is Panzer. Other notes committed recruits. 3 Drafted (Benoit, Blake, Bowen) 2 Not Drafted, 2nd Year eligible. (Hedquist, Strinden) 4 Not Eligible (Klee, Perron, Slipec, Strathmann)

One week at a time. Just win. Being a must win, this might sound a little backwards, but I do think you have to bet on who you have that's healthy. What I mean is sit anyone who has nagging injuries, 50/50, even 75/25 guys.

The more I thought about it, the more I like it. Love the 55/45 split. Maybe it says something about my personality, like the lower stakes.

Correct. Far from 20/20, I don’t want this to sound dramatic, but I do think it was the worse 3 v 3 decision I’ve ever seen. Only a few years of data, but it was that bad.