AlphaMikeFoxtrot

To focus on their own campaigns. Collins having to vote pretty much seals her fate.

Sorry for not prefacing with a trigger warning. Sheesh. Just because you have to pay for sex doesn't mean everyone else sees it as transactional. Do you feel the same way about Guilfoyle?

Your parents failed miserably, as evidenced by your lengthy mysoginistic rant about Kamala. You even doubled down, saying that it was a fact that she is a "slut riding whore", which suggests you don't actually have any experience with sex beyond watching porn.

Not waiting suggests a lack of faith in the majority and presidency remaining as is. I don't think they have the votes, but we will see. Either way, don't cry when the tables are turned, MAGA boy.

More of the <insert short sighted decision here> to own the libs.

Attacking the wording means you can't refute the message.

Only those you disagree with do that, duh.

We shall see if they have the votes.

It's funny seeing all the half-baked justifications for why it's different this time, but at least you're willing to admit yours is for hyper-partisan reasons.

Lots of people will hold their nose and vote based on their feelings about abortion. My state is solid blue so I'm voting 3rd party, but now it's anybody's guess who will win. My opinion is it helps Biden more since there are so many far left folks that weren't going to vote for him out of loyalty to Sanders, and this happened with enough time for them to do so now.

Blame the losers who claim Soros is paying Antifa to kill patriots and helped the Nazis for making any criticism of him sound like a conspiracy theory.

I don't agree with what he insinuates. So no, he is not right, in my opinion.

He is insinuating that the DAs make their decision based on what the scary Jewish globalist boogeyman irrationally feared by white trash conspiracy theorists tells them. If you have beef with Soros but not the Uihleins, then you just don't like when people donate to democrats, not that the ultra rich can curry favor by making donations.

Is that what you consider a rebuttal? Going off on an irrelevant tangent? Give this guy the siouxsports debate championship trophy!

Found the QAnon believer (along with whoever liked the post)

Me: simpsons' depiction of nuclear power ruined public perception of it You: it was the Media! Me: do you have any examples of this? You: *lists liberal media outlets rather than examples* Me: again, actual examples? You: look it up yourself Not sure how I'm supposed to have a rebuttal to that. I'm more than willing to back up my assertion about the Simpsons.

Then don't "fix" my posts if you can't back it up.

Do you have examples of actual articles they've put out that convinced people nuclear energy is bad?

Examples?

Matt Groening pretty much ruined humanity's opinion of nuclear power, unfortunately. Chernobyl and 3 Mile Island didn't help either, haha.

If they do support QAnon, they at least know better than to discuss it. Q Adjacent

Who controls Soros? Is it (((them)))? Is it the Rothschilds? Is it the lizard people in the Illuminati? Open your eyes to the system, sheeple!

The ones that are getting arrested, sure. But many are 20 somethings with service industry jobs and liberal arts degrees that aren't brave enough to actually put their money where their mouth is.

The guy who kept getting arrested for it was homeless (205 and Burnside is a giveaway), and the guy in southern Oregon has a mile long rap sheet for crimes related to a drug habit. Both are skid row, not anarchists.