The Sicatoka

Personally I find it more more curmudgeonly, but to each their own.

... and smelly.

Well if wild speculation is the game ... and following Frozen's trail ... Brad and some cohorts (he'd need a lawyer like the name in Port's story) decide they don't want to use the official UND nickname. So they pick what Berry wanted during voting and use Brianna's LLC to get control over it. They have no profit intent in mind. They just want their own hockey nickname that isn't UND's official name. They get the word and use it, thus creating a new identity that is not UND's official identity. Ingenious. And insubordinate.

There's a word for that.

Hockey is a sub-part of the University of North Dakota, not the other way around. Actions contrary to that are insubordinate.

Meh. He was only CFO for the Pillsbury dough boy. He was never military like Uncle Andy.

The intent, if what you're claiming is true, is attempting to create a hockey-only identity (with no direct profit motive). That is no better of a look. Dare I say it's akin to insubordination.

If the answer is to protect and gift to UND the follow up question is why'd it take until it came to light over two years later.

Not a general. General.

Part of this dilemma is due to UND acquiescing to and attempting to placate the fan base segment that is hanging onto the retired name or looking for something other than the new name to use. If only UND had a commander in chief, a general officer, that could get it all (in Athletics) into alignment. If only.

Even if you're right, what they left in public is hanging Brad Berry out to dry with the appearance of conflict of interest and self dealing and giving UND a black eye.

It's a trap. It's the trap. I'm confused.

Berry's choice during voting was ... well, look at the front of the Vegas black jerseys.

Agree. Somewhere around here from the start I said the current primary is better served as a secondary logo.

You have to admit there a difference between a Chinese sweatshop doing it and UND cutting a PO and doing unlicensed usage of someone else's TM.

Again, please educate us.

Ox, McFeely on line one for you.

I'm quite sure this alleged "highspeed Hawkzi kabal" did not: - force Brianna Berry to acquire a TM on NODAK - force Brad Berry to put it on a jersey I'm quite sure folks that favored the third place finisher in the nickname vote accomplished that on their own.

Here we agree. How'd they let a word they don't control onto a jersey.

Berry would be far better off if nary a dollar has struck his hands. Pretty sure a hired consultant isn't looking at a conflict of interest. Sections 1 and 5 are problematic for anyone who knew. https://ndusbpos.sharepoint.com/:w:/s/NDUSPoliciesandProcedures/EaiiN5o2pzVPsqHqQ7mEMXQBAAXzs8NFEWmFd5Z2Fhw0gQ?rtime=Qx90O9rT2kg The way the State policy is written just the appearance of conflict of interest or self dealing invokes the policy.

Quite a few seem jammed up right now.

@Walsh HallFound these: https://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4805:6059yn.3.28 https://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4805:6059yn.3.50

Um ... I said that a while back ... My provide guess may be wrong, but it will be a new vendor. You seem to know so much; do educate us on the master plan.

Listen close and "Harry" sounds like ... "Berry".

You sure? It's listed as a TM here: https://campus.und.edu/brand/licensing.html What's not listed? NODAK