The Sicatoka

It's so easy .... can't resist .... Mentioning pretend, I heard even your pretend friends ran away from you.

Shot-Score!

I agree with what was in The Forum. (turns on shower and begins soaping madly)

"The dynamic in our business is with facilities. That's where the arms race is." -- Ohio State University Athletics Director Andy Geiger.

From an AP story on the matter: I think the only way we'll see Bochenski in a Sioux jersey again is in pictures.

McFeely's column: http://www.in-forum.com/articles/index.cfm?id=67691 Enjoy.

I have it (and probably shouldn't have it because it is academics) from a very reliable source (no, not Virg Foss' ) that Bo is academically eligible. I'm wondering if his scorer's ego wasn't bruised when Parise got signed in the spring and Ottawa left him.

At least the distraction of this "is he, isn't he" is over.

Who? Where? The coaches shows I watch are on the Fighting Sioux Sports Network.

One more time: The domain name is ..... SiouxSports.com. Sioux, as in University of North Dakota Athletics. Thank you.

That was my point as well. Yes, being a DI-AA your football team battles against Marist and Elon for an NCAA at-large birth, but, your basketball teams battle against UConn for an NCAA at-large birth, your swimming teams battle against Stanford for an NCAA at-large birth, your baseball team battles against Texas for an NCAA at-large birth, your wrestling team battles against Iowa for an NCAA at-large birth, et cetera (you get the point). That was clearly Danenhauer's point as well. PS - I puposely avoided adding "your mens ice hockey team battles against North Dakota for an NCAA at-large birth" to the above.

You're Dave Hakstol. It's August 18. Do you want your team focused on: (a.) pre-season conditioning (b.) thinking about the personal effort each will have to make to repeat as WCHA Champions (c.) thinking about what other goals, beyond the WCHA, they may have this season, or (d.) worrying about whether or not Ottawa ponies up a few more loonies and two-nies for Bochenski. Personally, I'd pick: (e.) a, b, and c.

Nebraska-Omaha athletic director Bob Danenhauer announced his resignation Wednesday after seven years on the job. The resignation is effective Oct. 29. http://www.uscho.com/news/2004/08/18_008626.php

It was Mitch Vig. Mitch had just switched to wearing jersey 7 (from 13) for luck.

If they really do want to play some BB in The Ralph they should look at what they did in Buffalo during March Madness. HSBC Arena was built for the Sabres. They came up with a pretty good floor seating plan to make it better to watch BB in.

Negative. Schools can't waive an NCAA rule. He transferred DI-to-DI so he sits a season.

I hope the folks that say The Betty is too small turn out to be right. Why? That would mean attendance (and revenues) would be up compared to recent history and UND has the benefit of not one but two larger venues readily available. Until then, The Betty, based on recent average attendance, seems about the right size.

From the BSC press release: Seems like geography and cost are relevant.

Yet all through this, one troubling item, one item that Fullerton even recently specifically mentioned, remains.

Gonzaga played the 2002-2003 season in a 4000 seat arena. Wisconsin and Ohio State seem to make a common arena work. And if need be, you can play basketball in Alerus Center (~9000).

http://www.fightingsioux.com

Yes it has, and thus, someone is wrong in their prediction. Let's find out who. From USCHO: Dean Blais' prediction has not stood up to the test of time. PCM was the messenger. Why is the messenger being shot at?

I'd speculate that CU or CSU would draw what they draw for a home game if they played UNC in Mile High. (Big limb to go out on there.) You wouldn't have as many students but you'd get the folks who can't get other CU or CSU "home" tickets. The difference: UNC could count it as a home game and toward their per game average. (You can do that with one game per season.)

As far as any chance of making it, UNC would have a great shot at making the numbers if they could play Colorado or CSU in Mile High (as a pseudo-home game). Still, Sac State and PSU would each need to do 2.5 times attendance of what they do today. That'd take some serious work (or a home game versus Cal or Stanford in Sac State's case, or Oregon or OSU in PSU's case).