The Sicatoka

Fuk-ushima'd.

Are you saying no one could honestly be that ( dense / obstenent / illogical )?

Sure, but there are some pretty conservative folks on that list also. So let's leave politics out of this. This is about looking out for UND or wanting to see it suffer under NCAA sanctions.

I'd say more like the kid that saw others burn their hand on the burner but just had to smell their own flesh on it too.

To me, still, O'Keefe is the most telling. He's UND through and through. He has a unique perspective. He can see into the inner workings but is beholden to no one in those workings. And he's in contact with key alumni. And he's reached the conclusion that the moniker has moved to the "net negative" category and should go. Lennon straight up stating what he's heard from recruits moves this into a whole new realm of the dangers to UND Athletics.

Some like Blais. Some like Gino. Some like Hak. I like that the Leinie's comes in sampler packs. And all those opinions mean exactly diddly-squat (except for mine).

You forgot to list everyone who "outcoached" him.

Examples of Hak being outcoahced by Red: http://www.uscho.com/box/mens-hockey/2006/03/24/michigan-vs-north-dakota/ http://www.uscho.com/box/mens-hockey/2007/03/24/north-dakota-vs-michigan/ But Red must be a genius because during the Frozen Four against UND, he told his goalie not to let any pucks in and that's what happened. I'll bet Red also told his team to outscore the Sioux to guarantee the win. The man's IQ must be through the roof.

"... gone like a freight train, gone like yesterday, gone like a soldier in the Civil War, bang, bang, ... she's gone ... " But she (Standing Rock) left us.

Wisconsin follows NCAA "best practices" when scheduling. That means Wisconsin won't schedule teams under NCAA sanction. FSU is not under sanction. UND is.

Implicit in this question is the belief that Hak was pressured. I know people who deal with Faison daily. Pressure tactics is not how Brian operates. Remember: he has to have a working relationship with his coaches. Ultimatum tactics don't make for good relationships. And as far as Hak, his convictions are the hockey program (his program) first, then the rest. Something, something precious, has become a detriment, a net negative, to the program. As precious as it may be, the program comes first, even for Hak. If you didn't hear Schlossman on "Dizzo's Den" last night you missed Brad saying that he's never heard Hak say something he didn't believe in and that Hak would say nothing before saying something he didn't believe in.

With that statement, Terry Wanless demonstrated why nobody should take seriously anything he says about the Fighting Sioux nickname issue. Throughout this whole episode, what has the NCAA done that's been remotely "reasonable," beginning with the enactment of the hypocritical anti-American Indian nicknames policy by a few members of a committee who blatantly bypassed the organization's bylaws? To do this, the NCAA ignored a US Department of Education on-campus investigation of UND that found no racism. Despite that, the NCAA arbitrarily and publicly declared the university "hostile and abusive" to American Indians. The NCAA broke a pre-existing contract with UND by trying to force the university to cover all the nicknames and logos displayed in Engelstad Arena during the 2006 NCAA West Regional tournament in Grand Forks. The NCAA ignored repeated invitations by UND's administration to attend athletic events and see for themselves how the Fighting Sioux nickname and logo are used. When all UND needed was one tribe's permission to gain the namesake exemption, the NCAA ignored the Spirit Lake Tribal Council's official resolution which approved UND's use of the Fighting Sioux nickname and logo. And isn't Emmert the guy who agreed to come to UND to discuss the nickname issue, then canceled the meeting without providing any explanation? Is that evidence of a reasonable Mark Emmert? When a delegation from North Dakota went to the NCAA's headquarters to visit with the organization's top officials, the NCAA didn't budge an inch. What signs have there been showing that the NCAA under Emmert's leadership has been any more reasonable, flexible or accomodating about the nickname issue than it was under Myles Brand's leadership? None. Zero. Zip. Nada. Zilch. Finally, whatever happened to NCAA VP Bernard Franklin's visit to UND? If Emmert really wanted Franklin to come to UND to discuss the situation, he would have been here by now. It's yet another example of the NCAA's ongoing "when we want your opinion, we'll give it to you" attitude that's characterized this entire fiasco. Either Wanless is hopelessly naive and out of touch or he's being purposely disingenuous and misleading for a reason. Anyone who gives an ounce of credence to Wanless' statements is being played for a fool.

I always hope for "win at home, 0.500 on the road" for all the teams. There's some work to be done on that.

Wisconsin follows NCAA "best practices" policy when scheduling. Minnesota does as well. Florida State University is not under NCAA moniker sanctions. FSU has the requisite tribal approvals. Playing FSU is acceptable under NCAA "best practices". The University of North Dakota is under NCAA moniker sanctions. UND does not have the requisite tribal approvals. Playing UND is not acceptable under NCAA "best practices". There is the difference. Now, if a school chose to ignore "best practices" and scheduled SanctionedTeamA but chose not to schedule SanctionedTeamB, so what? Their schedule. Their call. Scheduling a game is agreeing to a contract: it takes two willing parties.

Knowing what I know of Dave Hakstol, if he was given an ultimatum (change your tune or you're gone), he'd walk. Listen to what Hak said. He got a reality check from Wisconsin. They've said the 2013 game contract is off if the name stays and UND is under NCAA sanction. Dave loves the name, but he loves the program more.

If we can question the mechanism or motives of Hakstol, why shouldn't we question the mechanism or motives of Wanless? Wanless was run out of UND. Is he above giving bad advice and getting the last laugh at UND's expense?

Down 5 with 23 seconds to go.

Insomnia. Need something to put me out.

1:26 to go and UND down 3 with ball.

55-52, 2:08

LaTech 53 UND 52 2:33 to play

UND 52 LaTech 51 3:35 to go

However, the "efficient and economical administration" part may win the day also. How? To put together an independent schedule in football means lots and lots of big dollar guarantees. Doing what is necessary to stay off NCAA sanction make scheduling costs drop dramatically and allows for the potential of post-season home game revenues.

The irony? While SL was putting out that emotion-driven statement, Dave Hakstol was putting out a fact-based statement, pesky facts like Wisconsin will not honor the contract for games scheduled for 2013 if UND is under NCAA sanctions due to still carrying the Fighting Sioux moniker.

The message of that song would be the message of the team: Don't fear the Reaper; just accept that sooner or later the Reaper takes everything.