siouxweet Posted January 19, 2013 Posted January 19, 2013 this has more to do than with what happened last night. look over the last few weeks, look at the types of goals he/they have allowed an x factor goalie doesn't let those types in game, after game. Quote
bigskyvikes Posted January 19, 2013 Author Posted January 19, 2013 this has more to do than with what happened last night. look over the last few weeks, look at the types of goals he/they have allowed an x factor goalie doesn't let those types in game, after game. Your right, the Sioux suck, put the sticks away, oh and give the rodents the hardware also, God knows it ends and titles are won in January, aren't they? Quote
siouxweet Posted January 19, 2013 Posted January 19, 2013 Your right, the Sioux suck, put the sticks away, oh and give the rodents the hardware also, God knows it ends and titles are won in January, aren't they? IMHO UND is not very good right now since they came back from break. you are right in that titles aren't won in january, but they can be lost. anything short of a win tonight and for all intense and purposes we don't win the cup. Quote
hockeyfan84 Posted January 19, 2013 Posted January 19, 2013 I agree I think both goalies have been shaky at times this season. With that said I do believe we have a couple strong goaltenders with potential. There's been a number of times this season our defense have been standing around not getting to pucks it was very evident in the CC series. If the play of our defense tightens up I think you'll see our goaltending follow. Quote
MafiaMan Posted January 20, 2013 Posted January 20, 2013 Your right, the Sioux suck, put the sticks away, oh and give the rodents the hardware also, God knows it ends and titles are won in January, aren't they? Don't forget to add 'Hakstol can't win the big one'! 1 Quote
bigskyvikes Posted February 13, 2013 Author Posted February 13, 2013 This is what you get for making an assessment in early season. Saunders is very inconsistent and Gothberg is the same. I have a feeling the big stage is affecting him. Yes he didn't lose 8 in a row, but that was then, what is he going to give us now that we are in the grind? I am thinking we are going to be like a yo yo, up and down. Hmmmmmmmmm? Quote
bigskyvikes Posted February 13, 2013 Author Posted February 13, 2013 as for the title of this thread I'm going to say in the words of lee corso on this, not so fast my friend. we might as well start gothberg just to see what he is really made of cuz we're gonna give up 3-5 goals tonight no matter who starts tonight. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm? Quote
ringneck28 Posted February 13, 2013 Posted February 13, 2013 Just like I have been saying! Every weekend it gets a little more reinforement to be proven correct! Saunders is the missing link for the last 7-10 years with all these stellar teams Hak and crew has put together, but that, in your face, stand on your head, SHUT YOU DOWN goalie has been missing. Even though the goalies the Sioux have had are truely good goalies, they werent the "X" factor type goalie........like , UMD, The beavs, Michigan, etc.............had for big wins. Now the Sioux have theirs, it is going to be a good season! GO FIGHTING SIOUX!!! HMMMMMMM? As I recall skippy, the X was Saunders and now it is Gothbergs game to lose. Before you call me out, look at yourself, your X has been benched. I will gladly eat the YO YO if Gothberg is the goalie from 3 games back to the end. Quote
bigskyvikes Posted February 13, 2013 Author Posted February 13, 2013 I agree with this, but I also agree with the idea of what would have happened last Saturday if Saunders would have played? Even though I would not put the loss on Gothberg, but that shut down type goalie might have helped during the defensive melt down! Never will know I guess! Just can't help but be super jacked about Saunders! I also believe we will be having discussions like this in a couple years when Gothberg is the main stud, with hopefully a back up goalie like now! GO FIGHTING SIOUX!! Hmmmmm, does this say anything about Saunders AND Gothberg "skippy"? Quote
bigskyvikes Posted February 13, 2013 Author Posted February 13, 2013 If, IF they faulter at the big show, thats where I'm talking about. That could be Gothberg or Saunders playing then. I believe neither will let that happen, because we now have an X factor type goalie(s)...... Quote
siouxweet Posted March 28, 2013 Posted March 28, 2013 we don't need an X factor in goal, we just need someone who will play solid and not give up the soft goal. I say whoever starts tomorrow if they give up a softie-yank 'em. Quote
ChetSteadman Posted March 28, 2013 Posted March 28, 2013 Then the next guy can let in his "softie" too. Quote
passit_offthegoalie Posted March 28, 2013 Posted March 28, 2013 We've got the Z factor! BELIEVE Quote
Let'sGoHawks! Posted March 28, 2013 Posted March 28, 2013 We've got the Z factor! BELIEVE The last time we had a freshman goalie with a Z in his name we did quite well... Quote
airmail Posted March 28, 2013 Posted March 28, 2013 The last time we had a freshman goalie with a Z in his name we did quite well... 03-04 wasn't that great of a year..... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.