geaux_sioux

Interesting. Must have been my subconscious.

New offer. Great size and plays with an edge. Very interesting prospect. http://www.hudl.com/athlete/4294824/highlights/304671391/v2

If you want a local artist or designer to do the logo the best bet as always is to email the people in charge like Faison Walton Kelley and Johnson and let them know.

For example. ^ that is the correct green.

Yup, I used the official colors. The green got all jacked up. Going through imgur helped though.

Another issue of mine with going very basic is that hawks have a great variety of tones and colors in their feathers. Oh look, this hawk is wearing a head dress, someone call the NCAA ^^^^

My issue is that the more bare it gets the more it looks like other hawk logos.

How do you mean? I can adjust things to see how it would look if I get a little more to work with.

Like this?

Here is the tweaked version of the green one. I personally prefer this one to the original green one that I posted because of the added white accents.

That's the problem. No connection to UND. How could they possibly understand the standard? They don't know the struggle of the past 15 years. I find it hard to believe that a logo from some random company would be accepted the same way as a local design.

This one is growing on me a little bit. Try and envision it with the proper green though. Still not sure why it gets so different on this site.

You'll have to be more specific. Which white one and which lines?

I'll post it but it does not look good.

White one. For whatever reason the green gets all jacked up when I put it on this site, I used the official colors of the athletic department.

I would really rather not. EWU has that market cornered...

I've tried all sorts of colors and combos and a black base looks best. Remember, the Sioux logo didn't have all that much green on it.

I wasn't directing that post to you. Then you decided to chime in and clearly didn't grasp the situation. Geaux FHawk Yourself , that would be much appreciated.

Is this better?

So you still don't get it? NDSU fans say that Big Sky players have inflated stats from playing against Big Sky teams who run so many more plays than Valley teams do against other Valley teams. The only way to compare this is UND against their schedule and NDSU against their schedule. You know why? Because UND plays in the Big Sky and NDSU plays in the MVFC. If you don't get it than I'd suggest trying to breath through your nose for a change.

Correct, sometimes doing 5 things at once leads to missing a step. Whoops.

Interconference is the only way to compare if you actually understand the point that NDSU fans always try to make.

Huh? The entire season.

I just wanted to debunk a myth about the Valley vs the Fluffy. I hear all the time about the inflated stats theory as a reason that Big Fluff defenders put up such big stats. I checked out NDSU and UND. I compared their opponents TOP and plays per game then averaged plays/min. Surely UND defenders would be facing a pile more of plays/min with all of the run and shoot gimmick offenses in the Big Fluff. That is the only way DeLuca would have fewer tackles than Ratelle right? UND opponents: 28 min possession/game: 25 plays/min NDSU opponents: 24min possession/game: 27.5 plays/min Interesting.... NDSU must have faced a lot of teams who were just trying to milk the clock with their ground and pound offenses.....