Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

fetch9

Members
  • Posts

    19
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://twitter.com/fetch9

fetch9's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  1. I question how people who want Hak gone also have enough brainpower to start a computer
  2. Caruso is probably the best pick. Bob Stitt at Colorado School of Mines is my pipe dream, but Caruso would do a great job I think
  3. as a Kansas fan, I can assure you they have no atmosphere. However I sadly can assure you that they're pretty good and I don't think this one will be pretty.
  4. Hey thanks for the link. I agree it's probably not going to happen but it would be awesome. The basketball team never plays on Friday nights and on Saturday night maybe once or twice a year (like this weekend) so I think people could go to both but I agree there's not a ton of interest down here. Then again if you plop a team (and a rink) in town you never know. For what it's worth College Hockey Inc. is going to give their spiel to KU (and missouri) at the Ice Breaker next year
  5. wish I could. I'm a current KU student but home on winter break so alas it's a no go.
  6. All true, but to be fair to Hak he has been approached about coaching Canada's WJC team despite Hockey Canada's complete bias for CHL guys
  7. Really not sure what to make of this one. Bradley is better than we are but if we play well I think we can win.
  8. probably. he's not good enough to where he can do that stuff though.
  9. I'm pretty sure we could find someone else who shoots a ton of shots, makes under half of them, and doesn't contribute in any other ways (offensively at least)
  10. More importantly we held them to .77 points per possession (they scored .987 PPP against Oklahoma)
  11. Great West. I'm surprised we won even though Idaho State is terrible.
  12. worst team in the Big Sky is still > the best team in the Great West
  13. shot the ball well against OU but didn't really rebound. Interesting.
  14. Well last year it was more of a they just wanted to get back on D vs. going after the offensive boards. I figured that wouldn't change this year but maybe since they had a size advantage they decided to crash the boards a bit more.
  15. really surprised at the offensive rebounding numbers in the game given how poor they were at it last year (though it was more because they didn't try rather than a talent deficiency)
×
×
  • Create New...