Unknown Siouxldier

Always so wise!

The committee had no mandate to bring in only people who know about hockey.

That budget deficit didn't have anything to do with Chaves, if you read the story critically.

There wasn't at this time.

Your category theory is wholly inaccurate.

The committee has been working quite well together.

Just curious if you would then make the argument that having a single institution subject to a single "law" when not all other institutions are would also void that agreement?

Cavalry meets all the criteria.

That is all true. But to me (and me alone) the question becomes...are they still all the same without each other?

Easy there. Not my point. Part of the problem on these boards is mis/vague/half/bull-information. I made a remark about one specific thing. Quite jumping to conclusions and making enemies where none exist.

Hey ScottM, The men can't host NCAA tourney games, too small a venue. The WCHA tourney is not considered an "ncaa" event.

Understood. But unaware the goofs' policy was tied to sanctions.

Not accurate. They are not mutually exclusive.

The goofs played Central Michigan this year in BB...no conference affiliation.

How about "The Shizzle"? Many references available... Snoop, weather phenom, Crowd could chant "You aint Shizzle"

"Cooling off" periods are often used in mediation. "sooner the better" isn't any better/worse than in three years. But 3 years likely takes it out of the agenda for election time.

Not having a nickname would not "annoy" the BSC. They don't care as long as everyone in the conference is eligible for tourney $$$$. A waiting period was always in the plans if the name is retired because it's prudent.

I'm sure it was McDermott voting for his favorite former coaching stop!

The stages of grief are really at work here: denial, anger, bargaining, depression and for some acceptance. A very vivid rainbow of feelings expressed. I think those who are angry are absolutely correct in their anger at whoever they attribute it to. I think most would agree that Kelly and Faison never took a stand in support of the name and for many (I'll throw myself in this camp) that's treasonous.

Salient post and nice research.