Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

SIOUXFAN97

Members
  • Posts

    15,822
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    66

Posts posted by SIOUXFAN97

  1. 3 minutes ago, UNDlaw80 said:

     

    Surprising what?  That I couldn't find info on on Swine Flu criteria?  I didn't spent too much time looking.     

     

    Either way, if it's not online I'm not surprised.   I'm convinced its a big conspiracy by the deep state, the establishment, the stonemasons and the aliens to make Trump look bad.    

    Liberal Bastards!!!! 

     

    bingo...

  2. 2 hours ago, UNDlaw80 said:

     

    Can’t find anything about Swine Flu.  But the CDC's  criteria in determining Covid deaths is somewhat similar to their criteria for the flu, albeit a little more accurate.

     

    Like Covid-19, if your body is weakened by the flu and you die of a heroin overdose, the flu will be listed as one of the causes of death.

    That said, because the flu isn’t always detectable, the CDC uses a modeling strategy that pro-rates flu deaths based on a death to hospitalization ratio.

     

     

     

     

     

    surprising?  

  3. 4 minutes ago, UNDlaw80 said:

     

    Right now?  Probably not adhering to complete Covid safety recommendations is a bigger risk factor (which mask usage is a part of).  

    We’re 6 months into Covid and, even with a shut-down and restrictions in place, we’re pushing 200K dead.    300K die annually due to the obesity epidemic .  

    https://www.wvdhhr.org/bph/oehp/obesity/mortality.htm#:~:text=According to the National Institutes,the obesity epidemic (57).

     

    And do you have a link regarding that Biden statement?  If true, that'd be utterly asinine.  

    why do you keep using "with" covid?  

  4. 18 minutes ago, TheFlop said:

    The same medical professionals that advocate for wearing masks also have been advocating for years for people to lose weight, exercise more, and eat better.  Obese people weren't forced to stay at home, wear gags so the couldn't eat, and they didn't have the majority of their leisure activities cancelled due to their non compliance back then but wouldn't that have cured the obesity epidemic?

    People that did what they were supposed to do (give a crap about their health) shouldn't be the ones to pay for those that didn't do the same. 

    well said...if it's okay to publicly bash people for not wearing a mask at TGI Friday's is it okay to knock the cheesy pickles from their lips if they are over 250lbs?

  5. 2 hours ago, Redneksioux said:

    No need to feel sorry for me, though I'm sorry you are struggling to comprehend the meaning of evidence. While I see what you are saying, this is not what it says in your article that you claimed as evidence. Where is the evidence from your article that you can claim herd immunity is the answer to Covid 19? 

     

    You realize the nursing home in Grand Forks is currently experiencing an outbreak right? Are you suggesting they should have their employees to retract their oathes, get rid of PPE, and just let this thing make it's way through so we can hurry up and get to your evidence based theory of herd immunity with Covid19? Why do you think they are going back to lockdown mode? Is Valley Senior Living ran by a bunch of liberals?

    probably

  6. 26 minutes ago, NDSU grad said:

    What I’ve heard is she had a drug overdose two days prior to her death.  Also had contracted MRSA and pneumonia prior to testing positive. 

    so she could've died from 3 (mrsa, pneumonia, or heroin)  things but Burgum went full fearporn and said Covid now "wear your masks!"

  7. 5 minutes ago, Hayduke1 said:

    Yup.  This is Trump's America...at least for a few more months. 

    Europeans Say COVID-19 Revealed America as 'Fragile,' Inconsiderate

    https://www.newsweek.com/europeans-say-covid-19-revealed-america-fragile-inconsiderate-1523860?fbclid=IwAR3Ik1iV17Mv8tx6LvMdUZaYzij7zLySnovgLNkQsITEojiLA5eIUYkuD88

     

    go outside and go for a walk...you'd be surpised to find out that it's kinda nice out there (unless u live in portland)

    • Upvote 1
  8. any Western Nodakers wanna look into the link above and see if the assumption of a drug od was the true cause of death...her name should be pretty easy to get from the obits and then ask around....

    nice journalisming done over there ....making the heraldo look bad again.

    surprised rob port hasn't done some digging into the "with" or "of" cod

    • Upvote 1
  9. 5 minutes ago, 1972 said:

    interesting...

     

    August 4, 2020

    AS I SEE IT

     

    By Neal A. Shipman

    Farmer Editor

    When a North Dakota resident is reported by the North Dakota Department of Health as having died of the COVID-19 virus it becomes big news. And it should be news considering how alarmed the public can be when the number of coronavirus cases start rising in the state as they have been for the past several weeks.
    But there is a big difference when the state reports a person of dying either “with” or “of” COVID-19.
    As the terms imply, if a person dies “with” COVID, it means that at one time or another that person tested positive for the virus prior to their death. The actual cause of the death could have been any number of underlying health conditions, but the official death certificate lists the virus as the cause.
    But if that person dies “of” COVID, then it can safely be assumed that the virus was the primary cause of that individual’s death.
    So why am I addressing the difference between “with” and “of” in this week’s column?
    The answer is because last week North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum, during a July 28 press briefing, reported that a McKenzie County woman in her 20s with no underlying health conditions had died “with” COVID and that she was the youngest person to die of the virus in the state.
    Immediately we, at the McKenzie County Farmer began trying to find out as much information as we could as to the circumstances of this young woman’s death. We realized that we could not obtain any direct information from the state regarding the woman’s death, but we were able to piece together some details. Unfortunately, we have not been able to confirm any of the details.
    This is what we have learned. The McKenzie County woman had previously tested positive for COVID-19, but the North Dakota Health Department did not provide any information as to how long ago she tested positive. But based on the unconfirmed information that we received from multiple sources, it is very apparent that she did not die “from” the virus but rather from an unconfirmed drug overdose.
    So theoretically, on July 28, a McKenzie County woman did die. And at some point and time, she had tested positive for COVID-19, which is why she was reported as having died “with” COVID-19.
    Obviously, the system that the state uses to report the number of COVID-related deaths has been in place since the pandemic began. But like many North Dakotans, I wish that the death information would be more specific.
    For example, as of Monday, Aug. 3, the North Dakota Health Department’s website indicates that 105 state residents have tested positive and died from any cause while infected with the virus, while 91 of those had COVID-19 died as stated on the official death record. Included in the 105 tally is another 10, whose deaths list something other than COVID as the official cause of death. And another four  who died, but did not have a positive test result, were presumed to be positive by a health care provider based on symptoms and/or exposure.
    If, as we suspect, we are going to have to live with the coronavirus for years to come, it is important that we truly understand just how dangerous the virus is to the general public. But right now, there are many North Dakotans who are questioning the number of deaths that are being linked to COVID-19.

    bingo! i brought this up a week or so ago about cdc numbers....why are we using the term "with" instead of "of"...is burgrum a rhino or just scared to stop this damn madness!!

    • Upvote 4
  10. 3 minutes ago, SiouxScore said:

    I've hear first round but who says first pick? Trevor Lawrence has been the consensus number one from basically everybody for over a year now. Lance isn't even the 2nd QB for most scouts, that would be Justin Fields. 

    i think his name is lakesbison...

  11. 1 minute ago, Hayduke1 said:

    Well, you need to learn history a little better.  Its pretty obvious that a real honest look at the past is needed.  Especially for "normal" people. 

    some people absolutely love living in the past...i'm sure your one of them...betcha some of your "friends" call you uncle rico behind your back.

×
×
  • Create New...