Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

SIOUXFAN97

Members
  • Posts

    15,489
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    64

Posts posted by SIOUXFAN97

  1. 5 minutes ago, zonadub said:

    You are saying The Summit should kick NDSU out of the conference because they are winning too much and dominating the conference like MiAC did to St Thomas?

    What does Denver have to do with it? They left, not kicked out.

    NDSU’s football affiliation is not grounds to be removed from a non-football conference.

    You want to beat them to the punch because they might leave in 5+ years?

     

    The idea to form a conference with the other northern schools makes more sense and, in the end, would be a stronger conference than the new MWC. Focus your energy there. Then, if you are going to be vindictive, don’t invite NDSU to the new conference.

    denver?  who is gonna replace em?  has Fenton even commented on them leaving?  did he try to make a pitch to keep em?

    you didn't answer the question.....if in 5 years the ndac is raking in the money and their coaches and nil is twice the next school.....just grin and bear it?

    make it hurt. hard.

  2. the MAC has 4 schools sponsor mens hockey...2 in nchc, 1 in hockey east and 1 in ccha....if 2 existing schools added hockey or the MAC added 2 more hockey schools would the MAC then sponsor varsity hockey (six schools like the big10).....or would they just let em choose their respective conferences?

     

  3. 15 minutes ago, zonadub said:

    So you’re sayin’ there’s a chance?

     

    slim and none

    IF the summit sponsored fb and ndac moved their football elsewhere it is more than a "slight" chance they get kicked out.....they would be gone in days.

    let's say that this pyramid scheme they are running in Cass county works...they are raking in the sponsorships and money and their men's bball coach makes twice as much as the next summit League bball coach?  oh well?  deal with it? "it's there money...they can do what they want with it?"

    ....think st Thomas.

    fenton is asleep at the wheel...has he even mentioned Denver?

    f'n joke

  4. 3 minutes ago, AJS said:

    I don't a major split happening in the MWC. Why? To start, there's only two all sport members who provide value to conferences better than the MWC (UNLV, Air Force). Now, based on the member locations, they bring some value as for TV. MWC provide a higher $ value than the other bottom G6 conferences (ex: Conf USA, MAC). So, outside of UNLV, Air Force, who else would leave and where? PAC value would decrease if they add anyone but UNLV, Air Force. Current members like UTEP, NIU would make more than they would going back to other conferences. Imo, everyone but UNLV, Air Force and Grand Canyon are stuck. 

     

    true..if unlv and unm go pac12 and air force says see ya to _____________ conf....it's dead. could happen anytime

  5. 13 minutes ago, AJS said:

    The problem with your theory is the 4 teams that are in bold will already be in the new (incredibly competitive / exciting) division of Conference USA. That'll take place before any type of major split within MWC would occur.

    something had to spook hauck...me thinks maybe msu said to ndac....you go first i dare ya...they did and now msu is putting something together soon and booby said i'm out of here

    c-usa calls und, montana, south dakota, and idaho.....4 nice flagships?

  6. 6 minutes ago, AJS said:

    The problem with your theory is the 4 teams that are in bold will already be in the new (incredibly competitive / exciting) division of Conference USA. That'll take place before any type of major split within MWC would occur.

    a split in the mwc could happen in 3,2,1........(denver airport)

     

    • Upvote 1
  7. 17 minutes ago, AJS said:

    Unless you're making 25M + in tv $ yearly, collegiate athletics should have a regional (your location can cause different definition of regional) and rival focus. NDSU is swinging big with this move. Where I've shifted since the announcement, is I think they're taking a bigger risk than I initially thought. Success would be if they win at a rate in the MWC / G6 as they did at the FCS level. Year in and year out being in the CFP discussion. Leverage that in 5 years into the PAC. Possible, yes. Likely if this was the collegiate landscape of 10 years ago, yes. In the current landscape, does 9-3 yearly cut it? We'll see. There's a chance their arrogance will finally catch up to them. 

    the ndac has practically ZERO chance at pac12......they are probably wise to the fact that a split is coming in the mwc....either a miracle happens and they are brought with to the pac12 if the whole mwc goes...(highly unlikely bc wyoming is....wyoming)...or they get left behind with wyoming and get to invite whatever they can to join and UND won't be one but montana, msu, idaho, sdac. tarelton, acu nmsu will

  8. 7 minutes ago, cowboys5xsbs said:

    So NDSU only gets a small cut of the streaming revenue for the MWC?  How is that tenable at all?  There has to be some weird shenanigans going on here....

    so true....you do wonder if that consulting firm consulted enough......this will be fun to watch across the daks and montanas/idaho.....

    • Upvote 1
×
×
  • Create New...