iluvdebbies
-
Posts
2,544 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
18
Posts posted by iluvdebbies
-
-
Are you worried they won't make the team?Doesn't it seem a bit early to be naming captains for next year?
-
Like shooting fish in a barrel in western ND!Naw found me some Tatonka
-
Did you find some chicken?I slept at an Americas best value inn last nite
-
1
-
-
That should not have been a goal....the puck doesn't come loose until the kings player pushes Stalock back with his stick.Yeah, I don't know what the ref say on the play and I haven't seen an explanation on the goal. Here's the video for those who haven't seen it yet.
-
Absolutely...I remember hearing awhile back that the good ol' boys were not happy with the rectangular shaped dressing room....there were threats to pull donations....sounds like they got their way.You may not be directly funding it now, but you and the good ol' boys most certainly laid the foundation for this.
-
1
-
-
Mine was 7-10 games, with an absolute minimum at 5 games. Now I think my initial prediction is low, those TSN guys seem to think he's in for a big suspension.
Good call.
-
My prediction for Matt Cooke----15 games.
-
Agree....it was absolutely a 2 min penalty. The little ball of puke was trying to milk it for a 5 though. There's been athlete's who have actually blown out their knee, that were in less "pain" than he was. He couldn't even put weight on it as he left the ice...but didn't miss a shift.Brad Marchand is a puke.....which everyone but Boston fans agree on. However, I do not think he embellished last night. It was knee on knee which Smith deserved a penalty on. The knee was totally unintentional though. That's hockey...a lot different than Cooke's situation.
-
I'm sure he was just trying to create space for himself....so much for the 'new and improved' Matt Cooke...he just can't kick the habit, can he?
-
Let's hope not!35 total shots. Wonder if the gophers will try playing d next period
-
Mattson, unless he gets hurt, will be in the lineup every game next season.I could agree with substituting Ausmus with Mattson in certain situations. I wouldn't separate Thompson and Stecher and Schmaltz and LaDue is too enticing to pass up IMO. Mattson, Ausmus and Poolman will all see ice time unless two of those three play too well to take out of the lineup.
Schmaltz and LaDue =
Thompson will either play with Schmaltz or LaDue.
-
1
-
-
C'mon, tell the truth.....Granny was buzzingund uw game when I was 5 years old
sitting by the band
badger thrownon the ice
uncle was hammerd
dad was boozed up
had to get grandma to get us from game
-
1
-
-
All coaching in that one boys....great win!!!
-
Watch the replay...if O'Donnell turns toward the puck instead of away from it....he probably prevents that shot.that goal was not all of Zanes fault but how do you not stop that?
-
It was....but that goal is on O'donnellThat was a softie.
-
No....keep goingLets get the next one....or two I'm greedy.
-
Does the M stand for Miami?
-
We will take that trade all night!
-
My bad ....I thought you were talking about the Providence gameAny idea where the refs are from?
-
Sounds like 7:20 puck drop ....we should make it!Lol espnuvwill be late.
When's pick drop
-
If it were my call, it would be 25 over 22.When I attended practice this week he was skating with Colton and Bryn. Looked pretty good as well.
-
Jim....what do you think about these numbers?
-
This would be an interesting wager if one was prone to that sort of thing:
Minnesota/Boston College/Wisconsin/Quinnipiac vs. the field.
On one side: the #1 seeds from the West, Midwest, and Northeast, plus the #2 seed from the East
On the other side: the other 12 teams in the tournament
KRACH suggests that Minnesota, BC, UW, and Quinnipiac will win the tourney a combined 50.35 percent of the time.
Which side would you take? I would think that wagers on both sides of this equation would be fairly even, considering some big names are still in the field: Union, UMass-Lowell, Denver, North Dakota, St. Cloud State, Notre Dame, Ferris State, etc.
Discuss.
Dave
Those are nicely matched. That's an important point about the way to interpret the odds... one might think that because so many championships have gone to teams predicted at 2% and 7% teams means the predictions were wrong. But, teams with under a 7% chance add up to 44%, which means its almost even odds the winner will have had an under 7% chance.
Is this what you are talking about Bigskyvikes?Does anyone know where the article is that showed percentages of teams winning the frozen four? It showed the four top seeds win it a little over 50% of the time and all the others which have individually about a 7% chance to win it, but collectively these seeds win it just under 50% of the time? Thought it was interesting and I wanted to show it to someone, thanks.
-
BC sure had a hard time eliminating Denver
-
2
-
Indian nicknames in the news
in UND Nickname
Posted