How do you know? Did you read the letter to which Kupchella was respondining?
As I recall, at the time Kupchella wrote his letter, there were four factors influencing UND's decision about moving to DI-AA.
1. The NCAA's consideration of a proposal to reduce DII scholarships from 36 to 24.
2. The possibility of NDSU joining the Big Sky Conference.
3. The possibility of UND being invited to join the Big Sky Conference.
4. The strong desire of UND alumni and others to maintain the football rivalry with NDSU.
Just because Kupchella didn't specifically mention the scholarship issue in his letter doesn't mean that it didn't play a role in his statement that UND "may have to make this move," even if it didn't possess the financial resources and facilities to do so.
Kupchella refered to "pride and emotion" as a factor in UND's DI-AA decision, but added "there is obviously a little more to the issue than pride and emotion as you well know." He also said in his letter:
In other words, Kupchella knew that the person he was addressing fully understood the issues involved and didn't feel the need to rehash all of them.
You can continue to claim that the NCAA vote on the scholarship issue (which came in January 2005) had no influence on how Kupchella viewed the DI-AA issue last December, but having conducted live radio interviews with both Phil Harmeson and Roger Thomas on that very subject, I know for a fact that it was a consideration of UND's administration at that time.
Again, the only point to all of this is that the Kupchella quote you continue to dredge up and repeat ad naseum is no longer relevant because:
1. The NCAA didn't cut DII football scholarships.
2. NDSU wasn't invited to join the BSC.
3. UND wasn't invited to join the BSC.
And because none of those three things happened, my perception is that the "pride and emotion" factor isn't quite as strong now as it was then.