Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Gothmog

Members
  • Posts

    1,043
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Gothmog

  1. No, he just cursed your board with 9 years of nonsense.
  2. So, now you're pushing your theory back to 2025? Nine years for you spin your yarns?
  3. It's pretty obvious what the Eagles were thinking when they drafted Wentz...they believed that they were drafting a "franchise" player at what is, by far, the most important position in the game. If you find that player at that position, the rest becomes much easier.
  4. I really don't know why you would say the odds are stacked against him. The plan may be for him to ride the bench this year, but it's virtually certain that he will get his chance to be the starter sometime this year or next. The general opinion is that he does have the stuff to be a long-term starter in the NFL...and there is that $26m guaranteed contract. Carson Wentz will get his chance to start in Philadelphia. The rest, of course, is up to him.
  5. IMO, NDSU is never going to "demand" a game with UND. There may come a time a time when NDSU wants the game more than it apparently does now, but it will NEVER "demand" a game. As much as you might like to see it, that's not going to happen.
  6. Your point is basically right...UND should worry more improving about itself and less about scheduling a game with NDSU. However, don't hold your breath waiting for NDSU to come to UND "demanding" a game. That's never going to happen.
  7. Huh? What does any of this have to do with KU and KSU never allowing WSU in the Big 12?
  8. So, the Big 12 is going to be "up a creek" for lack of members, but would nevertheless not admit a potentially viable new member because two of its members want to exclude a potential in-state rival? Really?
  9. Oh, I'd say the discussion is slowly dying as predicted events fail to happen. The shift in tone I mentioned is a symptom.
  10. Is there a point hiding somewhere in your post?
  11. It's interesting to note that the conversation in this thread has shifted from discussions of when and how UND would move up to why UND should move up. Progress, I guess.
  12. I remember a post where SV implied that God had put the oil in the Bakken formation in response to someone's (presumably SV's) petitionary prayer.
  13. I'm thinking SV's mother didn't have him tested..
  14. There's a fine line between visionary and delusional... Sometimes those on the wrong side of that line are correct, more often they're not. BTW - My saying that you imagine relationships between unrelated events was not a compliment.
  15. You are more able to imagine patterns in unrelated events than anyone I've seen.
  16. So, I see that the June 1st deadline has come and gone without any Big Sky schools filing the necessary re-classification paperwork with the NCAA. Care to admit that you were wrong yet again?
  17. BTW, this view might help you to understand my first photo better: Hint: my photo was of the northwest corner of Minard. Slightly to the right of this photo and a little closer.
  18. So what? The point was that it's finished and looks pretty good.
  19. But this thread is not a discussion of UND needing to move up. It is a discussion of the fact that UND is moving up. Whether that would be a good idea for UND is hardly even mentioned in the thread.
  20. Now UND just has the "option" to go FBS. It better be a done deal if this going to happen by June 1st.
  21. You know sometimes your posts at least seem to make sense. This isn't one of those times.
  22. Yes, I find Sioux Volley to be very entertaining. Jesse, not so much.
  23. So, asking for evidence is "heckling?" I'd be happy to accept SV's theories ... if he would provide evidence. So far, he's been unable to do so.
×
×
  • Create New...