Redneksioux

I don't see impartiality. Can you detail how they clearly show masks to be ineffective?

I did.

Based on what data from your link?

I'd like to hear from those that are anti-mask justify their stance using those graphs.

Who is calling for all of that? Nothing to see here right? Meanwhile Michael Osterholm says "This is the worst case of pseudoscience I've ever seen," "This is highly dangerous to public health, especially in North Dakota." https://www.grandforksherald.com/newsmd/coronavirus/6705808-Health-experts-thrash-North-Dakotas-new-quarantine-guidelines-This-is-highly-dangerous

Yeah yzerman19 is the only one of us that can afford that stuff.

Ok. So it is the president's duty to get the Coney Barrett in. But it's his duty to get Covid relief done, only if he's re-elected. Makes perfect sense.

Any word on what businesses are pulling their support?

Yet it's ok for him to halt talks on covid relief until after the election, where he promises to get it passed if re-elected?

So it's ok to stop working on this while he's still in office, but he has every right to get Coney Barrett into the Supreme Court?

Does it matter whose time it is on when they are using the program’s platform to further their agenda?

Did someone say back to work? trump just said, vote him back into office and he’ll get that stimulus passed. Not that he’s looking to buy your vote.

I can see the importance of keeping his health conditions private. They aren't holding onto his last negative test for HIPAA or security reasons though, and I think we can all understand that.

OK, so he's going to pull the HIPAA card on this single test? And how many times has he stated he doesn't need to wear a mask because he just tested negative? I guess this shouldn't shock anyone.

His last negative test doesn't relate to his health so much as it relates to the health of others - at the rallies, fundraisers, debate, inside the White House, etc.... So they keep this a secret to not make the President look like such a d-bag.....at what cost?

I think the general public has a right to know due to the fact he'd been attending a number of events. We already know his judgement was bad for the New Jersey event. Was this also the case for the Minnesota events? How about the debate? Why keep it a secret if there's nothing to hide?

Why won't the release the date of his last negative test?

Fair enough. But still not wide open like you've touted.

Now this is NOT wide open. With that said, it sounds like a responsible approach.

Your examples don't shock me, I mean look what our president did after he initially learned of his direct contact and then even after a positive test. Question for the flop, what do you do when you are contacted by contact tracers?

Where are you guys seeing all of these theories, because I must say this is the only place I've seen them. And they are only being posted by Trump supporters.

Fair enough on the international consequences. So why even release that he's gotten dexamethasone? The mixed message is what has everyone going.

I don't doubt that he has some of the world's top doctors. I do doubt the message they are portraying based on the treatments he's received and the answers they've refused to answer.

Not upset at all. Hopefully he has a speedy recovery. Is he on track to be discharged today?

It can suppress the immune system's activity, preventing your immune system from fighting off the virus if given too early. https://www.statnews.com/2020/10/04/trump-receiving-dexamethasone-steroid-usually-given-patients-with-severe-covid19/ Weiss said that Trump’s medical team had “an impossible job,” but that “you can’t say he’s fine and he’s going home tomorrow and by the way he’s getting dexamethasone, which was shown in [a clinical trial] to be helpful in only the sickest patients.”