SiouxFanatic

And it is 4-1 Denver. Unfortunate for CC.

Ruh roh, Denver goes up 3-1

Their PP is definitely clicking this game.

And Denver goes up. 2-1

and MSU scores as time expires. Possibly up 4-3. Review incoming. Edit: Good goal Man, I hope Berry & Co. are watching this game.

And MSU and UMich are tied at 3.

Michigan up 3-2 now. Back and forth game.

With that result, CC for sure needs Omaha to beat Denver now.

With such lowered expectations that everyone seems to have now(including me), can only go back up if UND gets its $hit together for the tournament.

@Godsmack

2013-2014 season, first place St. Cloud didn’t get a 1 seed.

I know the 2016 team got bounced in Frozen Faceoff semifinal as well but this showing by team today is demoralizing and don’t know how any fan can feel any optimism going into the NCAA tournament.

UND will be limping into the tournament. The NCHC frozen Faceoff futility at the X continues.

Lol, weird af. Just stating the obvious. But hey, keep on doing your thang.

PPG UND. Livanavage.

Really need to take advantage of this PP.

Why does it seem like certain alleged “fans” of UND seem to revel in when UND is losing or loses? Weird af.

Johannes gets one back for the good guys, 3-2!! Showing some life.

The amount of clean looks that Omaha has been getting on Hedquist is crazy.

Welp, now down 2-1.

I’m sure UNO loves the opportunity to possibly make UND have to travel to a different regional not named Sioux Falls.

Looks like UND receiving a #1 seed for the NCAA tournament is on the line against Omaha. That along with opportunity to win a Frozen Faceoff should be enough motivation for UND to give it their all.

Part of it is that it is usually easy pickings making fun of Omaha. But they have proved that they’ve got a legitimate competitive team this year. So I’ll tip the cap. I hope UND is amped and ready to play them. Could very possibly have to play them twice.

I think it is safe to say that Omaha is indeed good this year. Hope the boys show up ready to play them.

They must have an angle we aren’t seeing because I’m not seeing enough evidence to waive off the goal from what the views they’re showing. Does it look possibly offside? Yes, but not definitive.