sprig

While you continue to tell us what we are seeing. You have a good imagination that allows you to see what really isn't there with SD. You don't get it, and never will; glad you're satisfied. Arguing is a way of life with you. You are far from the norm when it comes to hockey fans.

You may be right, or you may have been duped by successful marketing into believing the cat is jet black, while it's actually albino

don't know if you and h1 are the same girl, but you both certainly spew the same bs

We've seen you gopher drivel on here over and over; that's all I need to know

I believe Goon has some family ties to Gopher hockey, and I wouldn't expect him to name names. Probably with much better rumor connections than you.

I agree, I do the same, even when there are teams I'd rather watch but the game is in SD. They are not comparable, not even close. Fortunately, FSSN, although it's in SD, is much better (with a KU system) than the highly compressed SD from directtv and dish, as well as cable FSSN, almost as good as HD broadcasts.

While some HDTVs do not render SD well, mine does, I have a good quality CRT also, and the HDTV shows SD as good or better than the CRT. Neither, however, compares favorably to HD.

I have satellite also, with both SD and HD channels. I can put them up side by side by splitting my big screen. It would be impossible for anyone to NOT tell the difference side by side. We realize you will forever refuse to see any difference in HD. That will save you some money.

I've never met anyone that isn't blown away with the quality of HD over SD, especially for sports, until you. You may need an eye exam. Hockey-close up of a stop seeing the individual ice crystals spray rather than just a white blob Football, Golf-blades of grass rather than a green blob Seeing the creases in people's faces rather than just a face colored blob Golf again, actually seeing the ball against the sky rather than looking at a picture of the sky (not that seeing the ball in the sky tells you anything about the shot) If you haven't seen Planet Earth in HD, or with a bluray disk on a bluray player, you haven't seen Planet Earth.

Ulfie may need to return and take out some Redwing knees for the Pens to have a chance. Just in the context of the game, of course

Maybe he went to left field, but I think the coach said "left out"

HDTV is a marketing gimmick, SD is just as good, and most of us aren't smart enough to know that, and have been hoodwinked into wasting a lot of money Any player that is a Penguin is a perfect human. There are no cheap hacks that are or have ever been Penguins, all other teams have them. Any team other than the Penguins that have a player considered by the media to be elite, actually just have a one-way cherry picker for a player. Argue with any of above and you are lame/uncool/dorky.

Good grief, if you need to argue, find your wife. We are all tired of this crap here, especially in a former players thread. Why don't you make your own "Argue with DaveK" thread.

Think you need to put aside your loyalties and hope for a Carolina/Chicago final, to insure a former Sioux hoists the Cup

Spezza puts Canada up 1-0 in the first in the gold medal game. We get a play by play with this webcast. Russia ties it on the PP.

First game I've watched, but this game and the numbers made it obvious the US couldn't handle opponents' PP.

US finishes the game in the Box, two men short; Sweden gets an ENG and the bronze.

Looked like a phantom call on Backes. US PK is killing them in this tourney-<70%

Pavelski ties it early in the third.

2-1 Sweden after two.

Seems like Center Ice or NHLN could pick this up since it's in the morning over here.

Sweden again 5 on 3; 2-1

Sweden ties it on a PPG with Stafford in the box. I'm watching on universal sports but it's on channelsurfing also.

Jack Johnson, PPG, 5 mintues into the second, 1-0 US

Anyone know why Miller was not on this team?