-
Posts
2,905 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
8
Posts posted by Midwestern Hawk
-
-
1 hour ago, UND1983 said:
If Tommy connects with Richter, as he should've, would "everyone have been on the same page"?
The facts show Tommy didn’t connect with Richter, he connected with an SDSU db and we lost. We were playing Russian roulette and UND pulled the trigger with a loaded chamber….again.
-
36 minutes ago, jdub27 said:
Can't tell if serious or not.
Do you think he just assumed he (the guy running a 15-17 yard route on 2nd and 17nd) was just a decoy?
According to you, QB1 can't get past his first read and I can guarantee that the WR's know the progression of a play, so not sure how that correlates.Watch the replay, richter slows down out of his break.
-
8 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said:
Correct.
Tommy had been sacked two of the last four plays (sack, to Maag, to Richter, sack) before the pick.The TO would've been to get everyone a deep breath and a "here's how were going to win this" huddle with the coaches.
Absolutely. Make sure everyone is on the same page and to also have the next play ready depending on the results of the play being run.
Complete pass and 3rd and short - this play
Complete pass and 1st down - this play
incomplete pass
Scramble
Sack
Again this is not rocket science and happens at the end of the half for most teams. Don't forget about the end of the half vs WIU, it didn't matter but that was a joke too.
-
6 minutes ago, jdub27 said:
Seriously. There is an argument to be made for taking a timeout there, but it has absolutely nothing to do with the clock.
They ran a play that would have done exactly what it needed to if either a)the QB led the WR half a step less or b)the WR comes out of his break a little harder, both of which, timeout or no timeout, can happen any play.
Time. Was. Not. An. Issue.I disagree. The sack changed the calculus. In my mind there was NO chance we were going to attempt a field goal so we likely had 3 more downs to get the 18 yards and then another 4 downs to score. It is obvious from what transpired on that play that Richter was not expecting the ball, so the timeout would have not only preserved time, it would have made sure that everyone was on the same page for the next couple of plays.
-
1 minute ago, Green Banner said:
UND athletics not had much success since moving D1 overall. Football has 2 conference titles. Mens Basketball has 1 and women have 2. Volleyball was a strong program for a moment. We need to get past "moral victories " or "we played with them". The athletic dept Seems complacent.
WHERES CHAVES?
Don't know him, nor much about him, but the way it usually works, is Chaves is shotgunning his resume to every university president in the country about now.
-
3 minutes ago, UND1983 said:
Unquantifiable
I agree, it was a seminal moment in that game, the season, for Bubba, and for the program. A win in that game, in that atmosphere, and who knows, we may very well be 10-1 and waiting to see who we host next week.
-
2 minutes ago, UND1983 said:
They were watching for Quincy. To their credit. When SIU runs Williams in the game UND changes their entire defense quickly.
When we realized that NDSU KNEW we were going to run the fake, why on earth did we not call timeout? Do you realize how much that moment cost UND football?
-
1 minute ago, UND1983 said:
Now I just feel bad for you. Tripling down.
When we tried the punt fake at our own 20, NDSU was watching and knew we were going to run a fake. There is very little "luck" in football.
-
9 minutes ago, UND1983 said:
There is a chart for getting sacked on 1st and 10 with over a minute left?
Every coach for sure has a plan for that so they don't have to think at all or make a decision in-game.
Our chart must have said after a sack let 39 of the 90 seconds run off the clock and then on 2nd and 18 throw an interception.
-
7 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said:
We (meaning the coaching staff) can discuss chart contents between games. And I agree not everyone's chart will be the same.
But having a chart, having the decision pre-made, so you don't make a bad decision under pressure, is what I'm looking for: game management.
... words here about failing to plan is planning to fail ...
Now that is a major bingo!
-
3 minutes ago, gfhockey said:
What was our 4th conversion rate?
also any link to final stats? I want to see Quincy rushing stats
52% on 4th down
14 Vaughn, Quincy 11 38 141 7 134 3.5 1 18 12.18 -
Here is the 2-deep from SDSU: In BOLD are the guys who are gone as of right now, either eligibility is up or portal. Krzanowksi is coming back as is Maag. Anyone have any info on Jalen Morrison or Noah Larson? As of right now the offense comes back almost intact besides Waletzko.
DEFENSE
Defensive End 49 Ben McNaboe 88 Luke Lennon
Nose Tackle 0 Jalen Morrison 52 Chandon Pierre
Defensive End 51 Quintin Seguin 93 Elijah Beach
Outside Linebacker 19 Ty Shannon 34 Josh Navratil
Inside Linebacker 44 Devon Krzanowski 10 Caden White
Inside Linebacker 40 Noah Larson 42 Kason Kelley
Outside Linebacker 15 Jaxson Turner 9 Marcus Vaughn-Jones
Cornerback 6 Evan Holm 22 Caleb Nelson
Safety 17 Hayden Galvin 24 Kadon Kauppinen
Safety 25 Jordan Canady 11 Jayson Coley
Cornerback 3 C.J. Siegel 23 Sam Robertson
OFFENSE
Tight End 39 Adam Zavalney 81 Billy Riviere
Left Tackle 72 Colin Lavell 73 Jack Kuntz
Left Guard 78 Ben Christian 67 Andrew Fenton
Center 68 Babak Ghadaksaz 79 Peyton Lotysz
Right Guard 77 Easton Kilty 67 Andrew Fenton
Right Tackle 74 Donny Ventrelli 75 Sam Hagen
Wide Receiver 89 Garett Maag 1 Bo Belquist
Wide Receiver 1 Bo Belquist 5 Jake Richter
Wide Receiver 12 Marcus Preston 4 Brock Boltmann
Quarterback 2 Tommy Schuster 14 Quincy Vaughn
Running Back 26 Otis Weah 7 Luke Skokna
SPECIALS
Punter 87 Cade Peterson 45 Adam Stage 37 Sean Fenelon
Kicker 92 Brady Stevens 45 Adam Stage 37 Sean Fenelon
Holder 87 Cade Peterson 37 Sean Fenelon
Long Snapper 96 Ross Hinders 32 Dylan Boecker
Kickoff Returners 7 Luke Skokna 6 Evan Holm
Punt Returners 7 Luke Skokna 12 Marcus Preston
-
The transfer portal has definitely changed college football, but will likely just be another tool for the better programs to thrive and the lesser programs to not thrive.
-
2
-
-
1 minute ago, Hambone said:
Who is Campell? You are referring to Robertson I assume?
Yeah. Rough morning so far for me.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, SiouxBoys said:
Siegel is gone?
Shoot. That's my bad. Not Siegel as far as I know. Just Nelson and Robertson leaving at corner.
-
6 hours ago, Sioux95 said:
Are you confusing Seguin with Siegel, or are they both gone?
Both gone.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
3 hours ago, Frozen4sioux said:I stand by my ascertation that somebody in hockey hurt you and you just cant get over it... I hope you can get the help you need.
Blaming the state of football once again and forever on your seething jealous hatred hasn't really worked, and never will btw....
Football is what 8 -10 of the nicest days of the year, in a warehouse, to watch a team that at best hopes to compete in an overlooked tier2 division... it can be fun, but the University has made it almost impossible to succeed long term by trying to keep up with the Joneses...
Could have been a perennial, and more importantly relevant D2 powerhouse..... but no... had to have the field inside.... had to be in the big boy club, had to have the D1 (nevermind the asterik) beside the "name".
And for this UND forever sacrificed every sport down the ladder as completly irrelevant and unable to compete in any real way.
I hope one day UND football is relevant again, I do, but to argue that other programs need to have their success interrupted in order for football to have a chance is just petty and sad, it's a loser mentality.
Thats the last thing football needs any more of.
Winners back Winners son. It's a simple as that.
Good luck with your demons.
You make some decent points, but the decision on football really needs to be about the profile of the university.
UND has a great hockey tradition and fantastic facilities and is definitely known in college hockey hotbeds as the “hockey school”. The problem with that for the university as a whole is those “hotbeds” consist of Minnesota, the Red River Valley, and greater Boston.
To 99% of the US population, college in North Dakota is NDSU. As an alum, that bothers the crap out of me and there is only one solution to that problem and it is NOT for UND to become a D2 powerhouse or have a strong women’s volleyball team.
-
5
-
6 hours ago, Nodak78 said:
You must to Young. I remember this coach.
. In 1980, Pat Behrns took over as head coach. Although he amassed a record of 36–27 in six seasons leading the program, North Dakota never qualified for the playoffs nor did they win a conference title under Behrns' direction. Following a dreadful 3–8 season in 1985 that culminated in a 49–0 loss to arch rival NDSU Bison, Behrns resigned as head coach of North Dakota. He burned a lot of red shirts his last year.
I didn’t say worst coach In UND history, I said single worst coaching move in UND history. In many ways Bubba is a really good coach, just not in that moment vs NDSU.
-
2 minutes ago, UND1983 said:
What game management?
Is this a joke? Start with the 4th down vs NDSU.
-
21 minutes ago, AJS said:
Definitely more transfers, but more off the 2-Deep you're saying?
Don't know for sure. Not just folks on this board who are frustrated with some of the game management.
-
3 minutes ago, GoHawks said:
Worried about this after the failed season UND just went thru.
Yep, its not like some of these guys don't know basic football strategy. The NDSU mess will likely cost this program a bunch.
-
5 minutes ago, AJS said:
It's so disappointing after going pretty unscathed after Spring ball. Any 2022 talks now seem extremely premature. Have to wait to see the roster construction once the dust settles.
Nobody else off the 2-Deep and we'll consider this off-season a success.
Unfortunately there will be more.
-
5 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said:
Added two words.
Good call on adding momentum. I just watched it again. It's just moronic. Did Bubba ever address that directly?
-
3 minutes ago, The Sicatoka said:
I believe he's referencing going on 4th down on the "minus 20" in the third against NDSU.
That was so out of character, so off script, I could not believe what was happening. Be aggressive, but on the "plus 20".
To use the hockey phraseology, sometimes high off the glass IS the best play.
We were going to take advantage of NDSU taking out the bigs and putting smaller lighter faster guys out for the punt. Not a bad idea, but NDSU was ready for it (coaching) and noticed our OL didn't leave the field. So instead of calling TO(or letting the clock run down and taking a delay penalty) and actually punting, we ran the play anyways and gave them the ball at our 20. The defense stepped up and they only got a field goal, but it GAVE NDSU the lead mid way through the 3rd quarter.
Future of the UND Football Program
in Football
Posted
Not on the road and especially not with our FG situation. Go for the win.