SIOUXELEVENS Posted November 3 Share Posted November 3 1 hour ago, scpa0305 said: There were a couple softies…and that happens. The far bigger issue is offensive consistency and team d structure. Effort/heart could also be lumped in there. From what I’ve seen this year, they are no where near a championship team, but it’s early I suppose. Doesn’t pass the eye test with how they play. And who is responsible for putting all this together ? Let’s try gimmicks, different logos, business suits etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
90siouxfan Posted November 3 Share Posted November 3 maybe a new alternative jersey, pink and baby blue, no logos, maybe some lace..... wear it until entire squad puts together 60 minutes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.357 Posted November 3 Share Posted November 3 11 hours ago, Wilbur said: Kunz was awful tonight. As a captain that's unacceptable. A liability all game with zero go to his game. Put him as the extra skater or leave him behind next week. He goes from one of the best nights of his career last weekend to one of his worst last night. If he had been playing hard he may have contributed to a goal; or at the least pumped up his teammates with his hustle, but no. All it takes is 1 player to not do his part & the effects ripple to the other players. Will Berry nip this problem in the bud by sitting him out a game next weekend, or not? At least it would send the team & him the message that playing hard every game is necessary for the success of this program. Then if he continues with his subpar attitude strip him of his 'A'. Coddling him & doing nothing just because he's a drafted local boy implicitly conveys the message to everyone in the locker room that putting in no effort is acceptable. Having a guy like Andrew in there instead who at least is giving his best shot is less of a liability than someone who has occasional motivation issues. Short-term it may hurt the team putting in less talented players, but in the long-term it sets the tone for everyone in the locker room that there are consequences for putting in no effort. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I Ranger Posted November 3 Share Posted November 3 Takeaways from the weekend. We certainly didn't play well but goaltending was definitely the difference. We have a goaltending issue currently no doubt. Our D breakdowns are atrocious and we don't generate enough offensive chances to make up for it at the moment especially with an ugly PP. Lastly we got pushed around and there was no better example then in the 3rd when Cornell came down on a rush and walked our D for a scoring chance and we turned the puck around for a rush the other way and our forward tried to make a similar move on their D and got knocked right on his a$$. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilbur Posted November 3 Share Posted November 3 23 minutes ago, .357 said: He goes from one of the best nights of his career last weekend to one of his worst last night. If he had been playing hard he may have contributed to a goal; or at the least pumped up his teammates with his hustle, but no. All it takes is 1 player to not do his part & the effects ripple to the other players. Will Berry nip this problem in the bud by sitting him out a game next weekend, or not? At least it would send the team & him the message that playing hard every game is necessary for the success of this program. Then if he continues with his subpar attitude strip him of his 'A'. Coddling him & doing nothing just because he's a drafted local boy implicitly conveys the message to everyone in the locker room that putting in no effort is acceptable. Having a guy like Andrew in there instead who at least is giving his best shot is less of a liability than someone who has occasional motivation issues. Short-term it may hurt the team putting in less talented players, but in the long-term it sets the tone for everyone in the locker room that there are consequences for putting in no effort. Playing against a heavy team like Cornell they needed him to play with an edge and use his size to try and turn the physical tide the other way. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilbur Posted November 3 Share Posted November 3 1st goal: Wiebe turnover coming out of our end. 2nd goal: Rink bounce. Cornell looked like they knew about that spot. 3rd goal: Kunz turnover. Put the puck back down low.....to Cornell..... 4th goal. Wraparound after d man missed the net to the glass. Hobie has to have the wraparound. Ask yourself how badly Kunz wanted to block the shot from the point if you watch it. 5th: EN. Turnovers and d zone. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scpa0305 Posted November 3 Share Posted November 3 3 hours ago, I Ranger said: Takeaways from the weekend. We certainly didn't play well but goaltending was definitely the difference. We have a goaltending issue currently no doubt. Our D breakdowns are atrocious and we don't generate enough offensive chances to make up for it at the moment especially with an ugly PP. Lastly we got pushed around and there was no better example then in the 3rd when Cornell came down on a rush and walked our D for a scoring chance and we turned the puck around for a rush the other way and our forward tried to make a similar move on their D and got knocked right on his a$$. How was goaltending the big difference? Their goalie barely saw anything in tight…and when he did, we capitalized on a high %of chances. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scpa0305 Posted November 3 Share Posted November 3 21 minutes ago, Wilbur said: 1st goal: Wiebe turnover coming out of our end. 2nd goal: Rink bounce. Cornell looked like they knew about that spot. 3rd goal: Kunz turnover. Put the puck back down low.....to Cornell..... 4th goal. Wraparound after d man missed the net to the glass. Hobie has to have the wraparound. Ask yourself how badly Kunz wanted to block the shot from the point if you watch it. 5th: EN. Turnovers and d zone. Agreed on the 4th goal…that was the only goal last night where I thought the tendy should have had it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MafiaMan Posted November 3 Share Posted November 3 16 hours ago, cberkas said: I was just going to say paging @MafiaMan New xG<1min stats for Schlossman to track Just effin’ unbelievable that no one has noticed this the past 2-3 seasons. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilbur Posted November 3 Share Posted November 3 44 minutes ago, scpa0305 said: Agreed on the 4th goal…that was the only goal last night where I thought the tendy should have had it. After replays I was over critical of Hobie. Our goalie was fine. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.