niouxsiouxfan
-
Posts
429 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by niouxsiouxfan
-
-
http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2015/03/alabama_basketball_was_going_n.html
Read this article about Anthony Grant. He got fired at a rabid football school for going 117-85. The opening of the article is very familiar.
QUOTE - " the Alabama AD announced he was firing Grant and beginning a search for a new head coach."
I know I am going to get skewered for this, but...
A change here would require an AD to get his head out of his hockey @$$, raise money to buy out a contract, and actually look for a head coach.
(Realistically, he wouldn't have to look far.) I just don't think this AD has a care about basketball.
-
2
-
-
Moorhead in their Sweet 16. Good luck to them
-
For the first time, we agree on something. That said, the budget won't see a significant increase until attendance increases!!
No, but to pretend it isn't a factor in both performance and expectations isn't correct either.
UND can and should be able to be relatively successful and pretty competitive within the Big Sky with the budget they have but I think a 25-30% increase in their budget would do wonders. For example, might help UND keep assistant coaches around longer instead of losing them to places like USD.
And just to be clear, this isn't a push for a raise for Jones, giving him more money isn't going to magically flip some switch. His salary is where it is for a reason.
Bigger budget helps with better coaches and retaining coaches. Therefore, winning would likely be a byproduct. Which would probably boost attendance. Then you create more income and things keep rolling. But it has to start somewhere. Where are the boosters for basketball?
-
There is no chance that Hooker doesn't start. It seems likely that Seales will not redshirt, but I imagine Collins and McDermott do. You really think Seales and Crandall will get starting nods over seniors who started all year for us in De Rouen and Tyler? Not saying they don't deserve to but I see De Rouen and Tyler starting the year out in the lineup.
The lineup that I hope to see is something like this:
1. Hooker
2. Crandall
3. Coleman
4. Cashman
5. Shanks
Simple answer-YES!
I agree that most instances Hooker starts. Just some scenarios could be there where he doesn't, or switches out in game to big lineup. No disrespect to him!
To answer your question better - I think DeRouen has shown enough problems that he will get few minutes. I like Tyler, but his size and athleticism arent what Crandall and Seales bring. Tyler fits a backup guard perfectly I think. Coming off the bench will also allow him to look to be more of a shooter, presuming he subs Hooker and Crandall goes to point. You have Hooker leading the first group, then Crandall taking point and Tyler's experience helping round out second grouping. Then Hooker can spell Crandall on next sub. I think you can swing these three guys specifically to keep them fresh throughout season. However, I know Hooker is used to major minutes as is Crandall, the coach may have to step in and get them to rest for the long haul.
I think our back court is going to be phenomenal, and a good time to watch.
-
1
-
-
Brickstine has close to 100% chance of starting. Started for awhile at Denver RPI 145 Team as true freshman. Did get nicked up and fell out of favor at DU. who's Princeton offense did not suit Brickstine's skill set. Like Hooker,and Brickstine to start for sure....guess is that Geno, Seales , and Shanks will fill out the starting 5. Like for Tyler stick to the off guard and out of the front court.
I take your word on this, I havent seen him, just heard. I figured he would give serious minutes off of bench, with possibility of getting starting role. But I'll gladly take an athletic 6'8" kid that can board in the starting lineup.
-
I'd be fine with De Rouen getting buried at the end of the bench.
What I like about De Rouen: hard-nosed, can score, not afraid of getting down and dirty.
What I don't like about De Rouen: undisciplined, takes bad shots, makes bad fouls.
Not sure what he's like in the locker room - appears he could go either way there. He does add some nice depth to the team just needs a little more court discipline.
I think we've had enough of a sample size to get an idea of what he is. His negatives are very bad. We have kids coming that play as hard or harder defense and better disciplined. And offensively, they will make better decisions. If he is on this team next year, i dont see him getting much time. Hooker, Crandall, Seales, Tyler, McDermott. All guards that have to have minutes. Maybe McDermott redshirts, but his shooting is going to be needed.
-
I don't see Shields leaving. (insider info - ask gfhockey)
I could see DeRouen, Coleman, and maybe Tyler.
I hope I'm right on Shields. I would like to see Tyler stay as well.
-
Things are what they are, I think it's obvious. Let's try and stay positive, negativity can go elsewhere on this forum.
With the tournament here, and our new guys coming in, why not look forward to next season?
Presuming everyone is eligible to play I see two different starting lineups possible.
Small (most likely to start this way as Jones seems to like running 3 guard sets)
1. Hooker, 2. Crandall, 3. Seales, 4. Shields, 5. Shanks
Cashman could be started in place of either 4/5, especially to go Shanks/Cashman at same time. Not sure yet, but for rotation purpose this makes sense to me.
Bench is deep with Bernstine, Collins, McDermott, Tyler?, Hobaugh, Benton, Blake, DeRouen?, Coleman?
I think you have to give the three guard lineup serious consideration, as we already know what Hooker is capable of, and give him another year of development, he will be even better. With Crandall's ability to run point or be a creator/scorer he has to be on the floor to take heat off of Hooker. Then put Seales out there also and you now have three unselfish players that can score or create, they dont care as long as they are successful. One may be garnering more defensive pressure and the others will be there to make up for it. I see Hooker resting with Crandall at the 1 and going to a big lineup and creating more mismatches off that.
Big (likely with Crandall at point, but Hooker is obviously capable of running this as well, even Seales if needed)
1. Crandall, 2. Seales/McDermott, 3. Collins/Shields, 4. Shanks/Bernstine, 5. Cashman
This lineup will be a work in progress to see who fits best where, when needed. I know thats vague, but different players can create problems defensively for other teams.
I think the most productive lineup will be with Hooker and Crandall in at the same time with another guard playing up with them. The younger players ability to score, coupled with their unselfishness and desire to win should produce a very fun team to watch.
Defensively, these guys all like playing pressure defense, so I'm sure we will see a more sustained full court man, with more rotation to keep them fresh. We also have players that are adept at getting boards, which is a need for this team.
Here's to hoping for a much improved season! It should be a good one.
-
Go Gonzaga! Shut those people up.....please.
THIS^^^^
PLEASE!!!!
But I fairly certain we don't have to worry.
-
Again, you're delusional. In this area, there just isn't any comparison. I live in the Twin Cities, for instance. I deal with alumni of the SL/MVFC schools on a daily basis. I don't recall the last time I encountered anyone from a Big Sky school other than UND. That's why UND has traditionally recruited in this area and not so much in footprint of the Big Sky. It's just a lot easier.
OK, I'll put it this way. Let say you're living in the Twin Cities, or Madison WI, or some other city in the upper Midwest. Let's further say that you have a kid and that kid is a good athlete who receives scholarship offers from two schools, one in the Big Sky an one in the SL/MVFC. As the kid's father, with I hope a fair amount of influence over the kid, which offer are you going to want the kid to take? The one were you can drive to Brookings, or Fargo to see him play away games? Or the one were his away games are at least 1,000 miles from your home? Now, put yourself in the kid's shoes, wouldn't you like to have your family at an away game or two, and maybe some of your friends too? Heck, some of those friends may already be attending some of those schools. Do you really think that those sorts of factors don't have anything to do with recruiting decisions?
Sorry, but there's no doubt that UND is at a disadvantage in this area versus SL/MVFC schools because of its affiliation with the Big Sky.
If you have an athletic child that is receiving offers from UND/NDSU I hope the kid picks UND!
It is ultimately the players decision as he should be 18 or close to 18 and he is the one that has to live with his first decision that will probably have a major impact on his life.
There are many factors that go into choosing: degrees offered, campus life, job placement and earning potential, and many athletic considerations (lets use basketball).
Location-ease of family/friends to see games. These are generally home games with friendly crowd, as many wont travel to regular season away game due to environment and distance. There are exceptions, local away games, big conference away games. Depends on scheduling, and this is some factor but generally if a recruit is coming in a coach will notify the player that they will try to get a game in their home state.
Style of play. The athlete has to look at what program fits them, as well as if it gives them a chance to succeed.
TV coverage. Both conferences have ESPN Championship coverage. UND has FSN North package.
Conference. The Summit footprint is the midwest, BSC is North Dakota and west. Many kids recruited from the Cities area and Dakotas have seen the midwest thru AAU and high school, they may want to see more. They have also heard of Weber St, Montana, EWU. I know kids that would love to go play in California, just one example.
I think what UND has to offer is better. I believe the draw of a bigger, potentially stronger conference, is what the basketball athlete is looking for. However, there are variables that could sway a player to NDSU, but they are few. UND just has more recognized schools in conference and more opportunity for the player.
-
I say embrace it! Imagine the possibilities...
-
Sounds like our rebounding will be better!
-
Collins had 15pts, 9reb in semi-final game versus Mankato East.
-
I certainly hope that Faison at least sat down with Jones earlier this week and outlined what his expectations are for next season. That is of course assuming he has expectations for Men's Basketball. If not, the inmates continue to run the asylum.
This is what concerns me the most. I dont think Faison, or anyone else in the athletic department, has much of a clue what a successful MBB program can do for the school. (this, is where the hockey first mindset comes into play, I hate to bring it up). The MBB program should define championship game as the goal next year. Short of that, it would be tough to continue status quo
-
No meltdown. I believe someone here actually congratulated the other North Dakota school on the victory. Enjoy the victory for what it is, stop trolling, or can you not enjoy that win without coming here?
-
1
-
-
Friendly Sioux? no longer conjuring a negative stereotype. Already have a ceremony granting the use of "Sioux". how could this be deemed offensive?
-
Well, not quite....
(stolen from the twitter-sphere)
thats whats bothersome on one hand, and funny on another. It happens too frequently.
-
Get your terms right, the global warming crowd has rebranded to climate change :-)Whoa, wait a second, bin. That could also conceivably mean Jones will be here forever, too. On the other hand, with global warming and all, maybe the only real hurdle keeping him from greatness will be removed eventually if he sticks around long enough.
-
Sarcasm alert:
Renovating Wilkerson? Couldn't those funds have been used for some hockey upgrades somewhere?
To continue: I thought that was the new hockey housing facility?
-
Its going to need more than that. It will also hinge on Hooker stepping his game up another level and the development of Shields, Shanks and Cashman. All 3 need to make strides from this year to next
Did you say development? Don't bet on that with Jones around. What you see is what you'll get out of the players next season. That's why I agree that the new players (Seales and Crandall) will have to make the entire difference. UND MBB is in a bad spot with Jones as HC.
I think its safe to say Hooker has improved from last year. Crandall can be a true point guard or he can get you twenty, can do both if he has to, will be interesting to see what role he is in. Seales is a great scorer, lots of left hand, but I havent seen anyone shut him down yet. Crandall and Hooker come from championship programs and know how to win. The other young guys also compete at a high level, some also winning state. I believe these guys will bring an expectation to win to the program and a practice regimen that will necessitate players get better or fall off. Shields showed flashes this year, but he needs to get stronger to get better defensively. you can see that from all the young bigs. Cashman looks promising, and Shanks seems to have the same issue as Shields. Nutrition and weight room, All these guys better be living in there this summer. Josh Collins brings some size already and he is adept at doing the dirty work; a fantastic rebounder and finds ways to be disruptive defensively. It could be a real athletic three guard lineup, or switch it up with Crandall at the 1, and have a big lineup starting at 6'3" and up.
-
1
-
-
That green/yellow is ugly in the NFL and even worse in NCAA basketball. Its even worse seeing them in the Championship again
-
Even though I had limited expectations for this season, I just didn't see a last place finish coming. Nor a 1-8 home conference record. I figured if Jones won 12 games or so, that would buy him another year. But I did think there was a minimum acceptable record. I guess I was wrong.
As I've stated before, next year really concerns me. We all know some improvement is inevitable, but how much is absolutely required? Does Faison extend him again if he just approaches .500?
With the players that should be playing the majority of minutes next year, I say he has to make a run at the BSC Championship. Good showing in the semis if it is a loss. Prefer to see a championship game though. A signature win would be nice, not NDSU, but the money games are tough to win. Sometimes, its difficult for a team to go overseas and play well that next season, but I think with the youth on this team, it could actually be beneficial for them to get extra practice and games in. If its borderline, i think you have to let him go. No reason to extend him, and certainly dont want a lame duck coach. So, its either get the team back to prominence or find another coach who will.
Unfortunately, with the hockey AD, I dont know what he will deem acceptable.
-
Hell, he needs to just get rid of that thing and go with a natural look. Who does he think he's kidding?
THATS NOT REAL?
-
so how'd they get him?
2015 NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament
in Men's Basketball
Posted
i was considering posting something similar, but figured that would go in another thread, or someone else could bring it up. Thank you!