Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

DAR

Members
  • Posts

    1,835
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by DAR

  1. No way you just called Phil Kessel a Sue reject?

    <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

    Duey, I didn't figure you would show up here anymore after that ass whuppin you're Goofers took a few weeks back. I am guessing the Goofy players are still nursing the bruises from being pounded into submission by the Sioux. Your Goofies better hit the weight room because they looked like a bunch of wimps out there, not willing to pay the price at all, now that is a team to be proud of.

  2. I'm just glad Zajac played well enough to earn this silly debate.  Good work to the coaching staff.

    <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

    Yeah you definitely can tell it is the off season, fans are already starved for some hockey. I look for Zajac to score close to 30 goals next year. Now that he has his feet wet in the WCHA I think you are going to see him have a great year next year. That was a good article on Parise thanks for the link.

  3. YOU GOTTA BE KIDDING ME. I too am a huge zajac fan, i hope he sticks out all four years and brings us to the house three more times, but he did not recieve the same kind of attention from other teams that zach did. For one, there was a rule "change" after zach's sophomore year because of the attention he got. You too woulda wore down towards the end of the year trying to skate with someone draped all over you every time you stepped on the ice. I don't mean to be an ass about this, but zach was just as good on the PK and in the defensive zone, and showed off more offensive skills than zajac as a freshman even with a defensman wrapped around his waste trying to tackle him. Give Zajac his just due, but don't slam Parise in doing so.... end rant

    <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

    Who was slamming Parise? I am saying that I believe Zajac had as impressive a freshman year as Parise did and I also think he will be a better pro but time will tell. Zajac is also much better on face offs than Parise was. Zajac is quite a bit bigger than Parise and that will help him at the NHL level. Zach was a great player but during his time at UND he was not able to help the Sioux do what great players do and that is win in the postseason.

  4. never got to the frozen four with zach. i'll take zajac.

    <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

    I agree! As talented a player as Parise was he was not able to lead us to the promised land. If think Zajac had almost as good of a freshman season as Parise did. I really think Zajac is more of a complete player as a freshman than Parise was, plus Zach seemed to really wear down as the season went on where Zajac did not seem to wear down as much and was great in the post season.

  5. Tidbit on Greene.  Mostly rehash but a couple of new comments.

    http://slam.canoe.ca/Slam/Hockey/NHL/Edmon...21/1006770.html

    <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

    I think if an NHL deal gets done before the start of next year he will go. IMO the only way he stays is if the lockout is still on when the Sioux start camp. When it comes down to it I think it is going to be a situation similar to Bochenski's, where he signs shortly before the season starts. I do think the lockout will be settled toward the end of the summer.

  6. I think I must have drank something....

    sdd teases me and Federov stands up for me.  :silly:    :lol:

    PCM- I always knew Mapletoft would come back to haunt you.

    Thanks Federov :lol:

    I don't remember the GPot hit :lol:

    Who put the hurt on RPot?

    With Smaby's progression as a big solid defenseman, I wonder if he returns next season, will he return for his senior season?

    <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

    Hak said it was 90/10 he would return. He had a pretty good year but has a lot of developing to do still at the college level. It is too early to speculate past the upcoming season on any of these players. Just having Smaby back is not enough to cover for the youth on defense, we need both the Matt's so the freshman are not thrown to the wolves more than they already will be.

  7. Dear Mr. Smaby,

    Go pro now.

    Sincerely,

    Danny Irmen

    :lol:

    <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

    Yeah it was great seeing Danny Boy Irmen get flattened a few times in that game. Prpich leveled him once as well. His only response was to take a run at Greene and draw a boneheaded penalty. Nice game Danny Boy, you and Potulny both sucked!! :silly:

  8. Yet another recruit sucked in by the Ralph's morgue-like atmosphere. :lol:

    <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

    He must have been there on the right night for his visit. It will be interesting to see how he does next year. 17 is pretty young to make an impact in the WCHA but from the sounds of it this is a very talented kid. We are going to have some real skill at forward next year.

  9. This is great news, I know he will be very young coming in next year (17 I believe) but from what I have heard and read this kid has some great talent. It just shows the potential that this kid has if Hak is willing to bring him in as a freshman at 17. He will look great in a Sioux uniform. He probably will not have as much of an immediate impact as Kessel but will be a very good player.

  10. Nothing more satisfying than ending the Goofers season in a convincing manner. The look on Lucia Pet's face as his team was getting steamrolled was priceless. My favorite line of that game was at the beginning of the game when the Sioux were on the power play early in the first period. The Sioux were really pressuring and the Goofers could not clear the puck and Clement says "this is like men against boys out here". It was also great to hear when Clement said the Goofers were on "life support" and the game was not even half over. At least we will be for the most part "Skippy" free this summer due to that whippin.

  11. Now don't go calling Ballard a punk. Taffe maybe, but not Ballard.

    <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

    Ballard's a punk in my eyes, could never stand him as a Goofer. Always taking cheap shots when the refs weren't looking and would never stand up when challenged. That is the definition of a punk on skates.

  12. Fuher will be teammates with those Goofer punks Ballard and Taffe. I think Westrum might be there as well. I thought Nick progressed well at UND, and it is good for him to get a taste of pro hockey.

  13. Hopefully the fact that the Oilers are strapped financially as well as the lockout situation will keep him here. If not for the lockout situation he would be gone for sure, that is the only hope for Sioux fans. I think most fans realize how important this decision is to next year's team. IMO the chance at next year's National championship rests on this decision. You cannot have that young and inexperienced of a defense and expect to raise a banner. With Greene and Smaby some of that youth can be covered up somewhat. The forwards and goaltending will be national championship caliber, without Greene or Smaby the defenseman will not. I think we need them both back to have a good shot at the title.

  14. I'm probably in the minority here, but I think Brian Lee would benefit from another year in Jrs. I don't know how much of his tenativeness came from not practicing with the Stars and only playing weekends. I really wanted to be impressed because of all the hype surrounding him, but I just couldn't. I don't know how he'd do at the college level, at times he seemed lost while he was in Lincoln. As long as UND eases him into the line up, he should be ok .

    <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

    With the state of the Sioux defense next year Lee is going to have to be able to come in and take a regular shift. There will be no easing him into the lineup and that will be the case even if both the Matt's stay.

  15. Hmm things to look forward to in 2005-2006? Brady Murray netting 30 goals  ???

    <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

    YEAH!! I agree with that Brady is going to come back with a vengeance next year and he will have some talented linemates to play with. Look out for Brady! Zajac will be even better as well and he was great this year especially as the games became bigger Zajac stepped up big time for a freshman.

  16. Duncan is a center.  I don't know if Toews plays center or wing, can someone answer that for me?  Duncan's lack of size is fine, a team can do just fine with one small center.  Two small centers can hurt a team. 

    How about this fora first unit PP:

    Stafford (on point)

    Zajac

    Toews

    Murray

    Lee

    <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

    I like that, although I don't think Drew is as good of a passer as Genoway I think he would do fine on the point. That would be a lot of talent out on the ice. Potentally four first rounders on the ice as Toews (when he is eligible) and Lee are likely to go in the first round if there is ever a draft. Drop the puck!!!

  17. If everyone stays we will have an excellent chance to be in Milwaukee a place where the Sioux have shined before! Man, I am going to have serious hockey withdrawl. I was a hockey fan while I was in school there but have followed it even more since I graduated in 99. It is a great sport and has provided me with a lot of great entertainment. I know Duncan is small but I really think he is going to be a dynamic player, I doubt he would be on a line with Murray though as they probably do not want the two smallest guys on the team on the same line. I agree that Zajac Spirko and Stafford should remain the top line. IMO they were the best line in the frozen four and the ESPN announcers praised that line often. I think Porter is going to have a big year next year as well. If he could just improve his scoring touch a little he could get 15-20 goals next year. He is a great skater and plays physical. I will be most interested to see how Toews does, will he be able to make the adjustment to the WCHA, based on the press clipping I think he will.

  18. I posted this over on USCHO, but will post it here as well for those that don't check over there:

    Fighting Sioux 05-06

    Forwards coming back (8):

    Zajac, Stafford*, Spirko, Murray, Porter, Fabian, Prpich, and Kaip.

    Forwards coming in (5):

    Toews, Kozek, Watkins, Miller, and Duncan.

    Defense coming back (6):

    Greene*, Bina*, Radke, Smaby*, Foyt, and Marvin.

    Defense coming in (3):

    Jones, Lee, and Chorney.

    Goalies returning (2):

    Lammy and Parise.

    * = not sure if they will be back next year, or in Bina's case, not sure if he will be able to play next season.

    Bina said that he has a doctor's appt in May to check his progress, but he hopes to be back on the ice by Sept. I'm guessing that Greene is gone for sure, not as sure about Stafford or Smaby. Smaby faces the same problem as Greene due to his size, but he doesn't seem to take as many dumb penalties. Stafford was on or off all season, I feel that he could come back and work on his consistency, but there is a decent chance he won't return, although I think he would really help out this team next season.

    Concerns:

    According to the numbers above.

    The Sioux will have 12-13 forwards next season.

    The Sioux will have 6-9 defensemen next season.

    The Sioux will have 2 goalies next season.

    They will need to add one more goalie to the roster, for at least the practices and to add depth. They will need to bring in one, maybe two, more forwards for depth reasons. They have both VandeVelde and Oshie that they could bring in early instead of sending them to the USHL for a year.

    Defense is going to be an issue. Worst case scenario, if Smaby and Greene both leave, and if Bina can't play next season, that leaves 6 dmen on the roster. Three of those six will be freshmen. While they may all be highly touted freshmen, they are still freshmen. Of the remaining 3, neither Foyt or Marvin played much defense this season, most of the time they were playing forward. And Radke only played 28 games, and not much at all in the latter part of the season.

    Yes, defense will definitely be a question mark for this team. Hopefully the return of Zajac and Spirko, including a healthy Murray, with the addition of some highly touted forwards will be able to score enough goals to offset the defensive lapses.

    Go Sioux in 06!!

    <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

    I just don't see Smaby and definitely not Stafford leaving. All this talk about Smaby is based on the quote from that Tampa GM. Time will tell but I see the only possible departure from this team is Greene. For some reason I feel like he will see the potential in next year's team and stay for one more kick at the can. I am going to remain optimistic that this will happen. I think he has put more of his heart and soul into this team than either Bo or Parise who I think we're obviously good players but were most concerned about their pro contracts rather than the Sioux.

  19. A big thanks to the seniors for their contributions to the Sioux program. It was great to see their leadership on display as this team came together. It hurts to come up one game short and I am sure the players feel that way more than any of us as they have devoted their hockey careers to reaching that goal and to come up short has to be tough. As time passes I am sure they will look back on this season with extreme pride. Good luck to this years group of seniors in all their future endeavors.

×
×
  • Create New...