PCM

The PA guy sounds like Ed Sullivan.

Big save by Phil.

I've got a CranGrape. That's all I can handle.

The all-freshman line of Zajac, Forney and VandeVelde are together again.

Radke centering Kozek and Fabian?

And he won't be because he has no Internet access from the arena.

So you're predicting the the Beavers will replace the Badgers as the Gophers' biggest rival?

Sort of funny to hear Tom Serratore disagree with Hennessy about the importance of the series for both teams, then say that he doesn't know how the PairWise works.

Another story from the Chicago Tribune with a few more details: Sioux to Illini: Return regalia Tribe says attire's use is degrading

Not if he's a Bison fan.

A column from the Chicago Tribune: Chief more than a costume

Wayne Stenejhem will hunt you down -- at taxpayers' expense!

From the Chicago Tribune: Tribe demands return of Illiniwek regalia

I was imagining you as chancellor.

Rankin took down Spirko. That's what started it.

I hope Wayne Stenejhem is taking notes.

I didn't agree with it, either. But then, I didn't want to be accused of giving the "PC version."

Smaby wasn't on the ice, either. Finley and Radke were the defensive pair. Spirko, Zajac and Oshie were the forwards.

Good question. Tim and Swyg bring up the other UND. It's not Hak.

Jones wasn't on the ice. It was Radke and Finley. McMahon wasn't on the team last year. He was a senior in 2005.

Really? I thought he was quoting The Byrds.

From the Green Mill, it's the Fighting Sioux Coaches' Show with UND hockey coach Dave Hakstol and hosts Tim Hennessy and Scott Swygman. TH: The Sioux are coming off a three-point weekend against Alaska-Anchorage and are heading into a home-and-home series with Bemidji State. Three out of four points on the weekend wasn

It all makes sense now. That's where Kupchella got those seeds of change that he was sewing.

Now who's stereotyping? I'm sorry, but I don't think anyone who has responded to you publicly has been cruel or disrespectful. Perhaps some of us have not always been as tactful as we could be, but from my perspective, we have not gone out of our way to look down on you. Certainly nobody is "supporting hatred," which is a most vile and unfair accusation for you to make. You continually complain about how much we don't know about American Indians and their culture. Well, whose fault is that? If you think that people harbor too many misperceptions and misconceptions about the Indian world, then it's incumbent upon American Indians to actively work to change that. Most people will not go out of their way to educate themselves on subjects that they see as having little or no relevance to their everyday lives. That's not being mean or hurtful or cruel or disrespectful or hateful. It's simply human nature for people to believe what they hear from others, especially when no alternative is presented. The misinformation that's been circulating for decades won't change until it's replaced with accurate information. Might I also suggest that erecting barriers that tend to hinder communication and prevent the outside world from learning about and understanding American Indian life, culture, traditions, history and traditions is not the best way to battle the ignorance you claim to abhor?

Actually, I agree.