Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Redneksioux

Members
  • Posts

    2,928
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by Redneksioux

  1. What's the +/- for false negatives/positives? Do you suggest we just stop testing or stop isolating those testing positive?
  2. We took PPE from the overall world supply. Also you say these were intended for third world countries but your link shows they were intended for low and middle income countries, but no country would be denied. By claiming these were intended for third world countries could also be considered fake news. The reality is that they were available and we didn't pursue them. Trump called them garbage and here we are 6 months later with garbage tests.
  3. Closures were up to the states and local governments though. In ND/MN we are practically immune to hurricanes. We are finding out now that we are not immune to Covid.
  4. Yet we had no problem driving up bids for masks and PPE worldwide.
  5. If he tells everyone down there to go business as usual and the hurricanes will magically disappear, yes we can blame him. Maybe he can draw us up a map of where he thinks the hurricanes will go:)
  6. I don’t blame trump for you blatantly ignoring my question last Friday. I guess we could just blame that on systemic ignorance.
  7. The same could be said of those defending him. Here’s an idea, if we were testing less, we’d have less bad testing happen. I wonder why no one has considered this thought process
  8. Ok so we didn’t use them, trump called them bad tests which was proven to be false, and we chose to use our own tests, which have turned out to be bad tests. Got it.
  9. Fair enough. I seem to remember him rejecting the WHO’s test this spring, as we could do it better. 6 months later, are our tests better?
  10. And who is to blame for these faulty tests? We’ve been at this now for 6 months and still aren’t getting it right? I see the hhs is also handing covid counting back to the cdc. What a $hitshow!
  11. Again, I don’t disagree with anything you are saying here. though, I’m curious why you have such a difficult time acknowledging that the mother put her kid in a bad situation.
  12. Again, not disagreeing with you. But you refuse to acknowledge the big picture, still. That’s the point.
  13. Sorry if I hit a nerve. Again I’m not defending the ladies that took the hats and signs. I’m questioning why you are defending the lady putting her kid into harm’s way.
  14. Rightfully so I’m not disagreeing with the arrest. So you would also drag your bawling child through the parking lot after the suspect and tell him to get his hat back? Doesn’t the situation seem a little unstable to you?
  15. My alter egos? Are you guys really that out of touch with reality to realize that more than one person can disagree with your stance?
  16. Sure she can. But she was clearly looking for a fight. I’m not defending the losers that took their stuff. But you are going out of your way to defend the woman sending her elementary aged kids in to fight. Do you often lack good judgement?
  17. So the woman trying to pick a fight using her kids as bait and encouraging them to go after these girls is innocent. Man I hope your bias doesn’t carry over into your job.
  18. You just had to disrupt my weekend didn’t you? I take it you would send your elementary school kids to that location holding maga signs and maga hats? If so great, you’re a real winner and more power to you. And when a fight with adults starts would you encourage them to get in the mix of it? A true champion you are. Carry on!
  19. See, you wouldn’t do that to me because I Wouldnt have my kids in those hats with signs outside the dnc or gop for that matter. Just settle down there’s no need for such aggression. and have a great weekend siouxsports!
  20. Yeah and he was following her and getting a close to her. They were clearly both in the wrong here. Coming on here claiming you'd knock her out says alot about you.
  21. We've seen thousands of instances recently of people's signs being taken, called names, and even gassed, peppered, or water cannoned. Who's in the wrong and who's in the right? I don't know. I know I'm not putting myself or my kids in those situations. But there's some on here that get all worked up and claim they would respond with violence and it's only coming from one side.
  22. You are looking at this from one side. If they were sitting down to eat, why did they have signs and wearing pro-Trump stuff outside the DNC HQ. Not saying they were breaking any laws, but they also were looking for trouble. And the parents were involving their kids as well. After the hat and signs were taken (you're a better expert than I whether or not this was assault) they followed these girls and literally chased them down, egging the kids on to get their stuff back. To me it looks like they were looking for a fight and both sides were in the wrong. But I don't work in law enforcement, you do, so you get to decide who goes to jail here.
  23. the video has been taken down. I saw a bunch of jumping around but i didn't see anyone take a swing and hit anyone.
  24. So this case would be an exception to your “if they swing first” rule? How many women have you knocked out cold?
×
×
  • Create New...