Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Redneksioux

Members
  • Posts

    2,965
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by Redneksioux

  1. https://twitter.com/DemWrite/status/1298506383638200323?s=20
  2. So you disagree the reason he was targeted was the fact he was open carrying an AR through a protest? You think he still would have been attacked if he wasn't open carrying? The police have every reason to be thrown under the bus after enabling these losers.
  3. Not disagreeing. But watching the opportunities Kyle Rittenhouse was granted by law enforcement will only spark further unrest.
  4. Self defense. I can see that on one of his shots possibly. Still he had no right to be there past curfew and carrying an AR at a protest. Peppering bullets into the crowd is also not self defense. The video I saw showed no Molotov cocktail and there was also mention of a shot fired by him prior to the video, likely what caused the protestors to go after him. it’s odd how he was able to walk up to and past a number of police carrying the AR, with his hands sometimes in the air. Jacob Blake wasn’t given an opportunity anywhere near this kid.
  5. Sad to see this happening and it only seems to be going downhill. https://bringmethenews.com/minnesota-news/crowd-gathers-looting-breaks-out-in-minneapolis-amid-misinformation-about-mans-suicide
  6. Another perfect example of people not qualified to be handling firearms. Concerning to see the police picking a side here.
  7. Based on what I'm reading here, protesters wouldn't last too long in rural North Dakota.
  8. Go ahead and show force, but do not point gun at someone/something you do not intend to shoot.
  9. so now that their guns are gone, their mansion is burning?
  10. I do not cheer cop killing. Are you a boogaloo boi?
  11. There's a big difference between defending your property and pointing guns at people that showed no intention of even stepping foot on your property.
  12. Great people on both sides here!
  13. I get it now, they saved the whole gated community from being burned. Hero's they are indeed:)
  14. I’m all for defending and upholding the 2nd amendment as I’m sure you are as well. You really think putting these two front and center is going to help that cause?
  15. Give them their day in court sure. I do disagree with their actions and am fine letting the court decide whether they are responsible enough to be gun owners. They can speak at the RNC all they want, I'm sure they will represent well.
  16. https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-53891184 They are being charged with unlawful use of a firearm which is a felony as they did not have the right to be pointing guns at people. Also the property the protestors were on is owned by a trust that residents pay to maintain that includes private security. I doubt the McCloskey's are the paid private security. The fact that the RNC is inviting them to speak is laughable and says alot about the current state of the Republican Party.
  17. Maybe so but maybe not. It still doesn't give them the right to be pointing guns at people.
  18. I'd assume the community or HOA? I don't believe the road or sidewalk is the couple's own private property but I could be wrong.
  19. Yet this mob didn't burn or loot anything. I wouldn't have invited them in. I also wouldn't have pointed guns at them.
  20. I believe the road and sidewalk belong to the gated community. The protesters may have been trespassing, but they were NOT trespassing on this couple's property. The couple had no right to point their guns at hundreds of people. If you think they were in the right to point their guns at people and would do the same yourself, you should probably enroll yourself into a gun safety class before using your firearms again.
  21. I certainly hope you don't point guns at people that you believe are on your property, when in all actuality they are not.
  22. It may be private property but it is not the couple’s property. You don’t own any guns, do you?
  23. So the gate got breached. That justifies pointing a firearm at people that have not stepped foot on your property?
  24. How many homes on that block were breached? did anyone even step foot on this couple’s property? Any responsible firearm owner understands you only point your weapon at something you intend to shoot. These two wouldn’t be considered very responsible gun owners.
×
×
  • Create New...