burd

You're probably right. Besides, whining about good things is bad form.

Inconceivable!

Goal is to sweep Minimum objective = one point and stay in top 2 PWR Split is still a challenge but a reasonable expectation, IMO

I've been happy with the NCHC broadcasts, but I'm disappointed that I only get to see one game per weekend with that subscription, even when the Sioux play at home. I don't recall it being presented that way when I subscribed. It's still well worth it, but mildly irritating.

I think so, but as I recall it was a guy who has never been right about anything hockey-related before or since, so no one paid any attention.

I hope it's not the trainer who's letting medical information out. Friends and teammates OK, but not that person.

Well you're not the only one . . .

Ironic, because political speech is afforded more first amendment protection than non political speech in the school setting. Obviously, this is not the school room and there are other limitations on signage, etc.

True, but, you know, with this group, if they can win #8 with Mark, they can win it without him. Resiliency has become their identity.

That seems awfully low, Sic. Must be a bunch of states with none, because many have two, and Cal alone has 5 or 6.

When I saw him do that on a faceoff, my first thought was "I'd like to see this kid's ACT score." LJ is a fine player who brings a lot to the team, but some guys just have a problem figuring some things out.

That's a fair point. In goal and on D alone, we have some serious talent. I guess I fell into the trap of looking at the scorers, where we do have NS and Caggiula, among others. But this team wins with gritty play and hustle goals. Most of the time.

You're right about Johnson. He got away with one in the third when he cross checked a guy out of frustration at the faceoff dot. It was just a stupid reaction.

When we had the DOT line, I think we all knew we were witnessing a rare combination of talent that might not come along again. With this team, we are witnessing a special blue collar character and togetherness than we may not see again for a while. And has been mentioned before, even though they win through hard work and toughness, they have managed to do a good job of staying away from stupid in-your-face type penalties. They seem to get the balance, and that has to come from their leaders.

I think you are right--the knee cap injury doesn't make much sense. Easier to damage the tendon above the patella, I suppose.

If you are a recent UND grad, they maybe Kelly's critics have a point about how our school is failing us.

Did they send you for donuts like they do out on the patch?

If he got a fractured kneecap through a shin pad, that's one hell of a slapper. If he was down on his knees, though, it might have caught some exposed area above the hard part of his pad.

To some fans, the only measure of success now is a banner. Hakstol has 11 straight 20-win seasons, and the next closest is York with 5. Yet some fans would ask for his head if he doesn't win the banner. We all want a banner, but that's pretty mindless thinking, and it gets to the players, you can be sure.

This will sound like sacrilege and I can't defend it with any kind of logic, but I wouldn't mind seeing the boys drop a game they wanted between now and game one of the regionals.

Think for a second how odd this conversation would have seemed just a few years ago--UND sharing first place votes with Mankato and Tech. With Michigan and Minnesota playing with the bubble and Maine and Wisconsin nowhere in sight.

It's just way of describing a crack or partial fracture with no bone displacement or misalignment. Common enough term but I'm sure it's not clinical. But he took it above the knee, it's probably not a fracture.

Deep contusion or solid fracture.

This team is really playing good hockey. At every position.

He's always been one to take things into his own hands.