DamStrait

Hmmmm...sounds like Parise's trying to do to much again. JUST STOP THE @*$#%& PUCK!!! KISS

Yes, but what did TH have to say about it?

And as I recall he bit on at least a few Robbie Earl dives in that series. Great.

Who the ^$%#%$#% is the stripe tonight?

This is a game the boys need to win. Time to show some $#^$%&$& urgency. Time for the coaches and captains to throw things.

Hakstol call a time out. Pull JP. Earn your Y&^$#&^ pay or quit. I am tired of this %^#% s&!t. UAA, ARE YOU KIDDDING ME!!!!!! &^*%^&$%&^(&^U%^&^%

sdd, are you listening to TH? What is he saying? Who is carrying play, or is it fairly even? Who was on the ice fo UAA's second goal?

no go so far, anywhere (you are not alone)

How about some game commentary from someone that's listening to TH? PLEASE

LGS, it is not the "Notre Dame logo", it is the interlocking ND logo. Please refrain from referring to it as such. Failure to do so may result in the University of North Dakota taking legal action against you. If anything, Notre Dame should refer to it as the University of North Dakota logo.

The question is: Even if it's implemented, will they use it? Ass-clown crap-sack Todd Anderson refused to use it this year when the Sioux were at CC (player preceding the puck into the crease on a Sioux goal). Maybe that's not a reviewable call. If not, it should be. I know, I know, shithead ruled that he was not pushed in and what needed to be reviewed was not whether he preceded the puck into the crease, but whether he was pushed in. The former may be reviewable, but not the latter. IMHO both should be reviewable.

UM - is that Michigan or Maine?

Name ONE college hockey uni you consider to be better than the old Sioux 'hawk unis.

Just MHO but I disagree. I am not a fan of the UND flame logo. Don't know why, I'm just not. The Sioux hockey unis used to be blatant rip-offs of the Blackhawks, but they were the best (IMHO) college unis EVER!

While it's never bad for the dirty yellow vermin to struggle, it would mean a hell of a lot more if the Sioux could take advantage of it. To date, they have not and I fear that's something that won't change. My questions are: Are the vermin showing urgency or are they panicking? Are the Sioux staying calm in a crisis or are they past caring? I hope it's the latter and former, respectively, but time will tell.

Screw Notre Dame and what everyone knows. UND had it first and there is no reason not to continue using it. Different is not necessarily better. Please do not refer to it as the Notre Dame logo. As a Sioux fan you should know better.

I hate that sawed-off crap-sack Gwozdecky and I love Sandy, but I have to root for DU for the sake of my Sioux. If it's of any comfort, I think UMD might be hitting DU just at the right time. Their streak has to end some time, and they are definitely getting big heads.

I agree, the more green and white the better. Use black only as a thin line to help highlight and define edges. Let's go old school! Take the "SIOUX" lettering off the front, make the Indian-head logo bigger, go with horizontal stripes instead of the diagonal ones, go with string laced necks, and put the crossed 'hawks back on the shoulders (maybe one shoulder w/ the interlocked UND and the other w/ the crossed 'hawks)!

The better question is, would they deserve to? Don't get me wrong, I want the boys in the national tournament, but I want them going in with momentum and I want them to make some noise when they get there.

How was the reception last weekend for the Denver Series? I wasn't in town for it.