Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Fratt Mattin

Members
  • Posts

    207
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Fratt Mattin

  1. The Ralph takes money from football?
  2. I’d be fine with that too. Moot point as long as the 14 sport minimum is in place unfortunately
  3. Yes. Hence my advocating to cut all but a few of them
  4. I really don't understand the reaction to this that I am seeing on social media. Why in the world should colleges keep funding sports that lose boatloads of money and that nobody attends? The school and the community gain nothing by having a tennis team. If the minimum sport requirement and Title IX were not a thing, I would see no reason why we shouldn't cut everything but hockey, football, and men's and women's basketball. Make everything else club sports
  5. This, 100%. The minimum sports requirement makes no sense to me
  6. I really only see upside to this move. If you earmark even half of what we will save on tennis for revenue share for hockey, that’s at least 2-3 top six caliber forwards you can now pay for. Take the other half and put it toward rev share for football and now we’re really cooking
  7. I don’t see why this is so shocking to people. I’m always sad to see sports go, but it’s very hard to justify keeping a sport that was losing us $1 million per year
  8. I believe his dad owns the Wheat Kings, so I sort of assume he's of the table.
  9. I thought he had been following us for a while
  10. I believe it's because they have a home football game on Saturday, which is just sad. Gopher hockey is second fiddle at best on that campus. Maybe third when basketball is good
  11. I think it's the NHL or college for him next year. I don't see what he would have to gain by going back to the CHL. As others have said, probably just trying to say the right thing here and not be disrespectul to PG
  12. Have you heard anything about who might be more realistic targets?
  13. Not taking a side in this debate, but I do have to disagree that Verhoeff had a solid game against Wisconsin. Now to be fair, most of the team struggled, but he really crumbled against that forecheck
  14. All good, that makes more sense. I agree with your comment as it pertains to Lindberg
  15. I would be suprised if Magnussen would come here without basically being guaranteed top 6 time given he was first line, point per game at Bemidji. If you’re right though, that’s great as it would probably mean some big CHLers are coming
  16. Scoring mainly, but I do have concerns. He only had 4 goals at 5 on 5 last year. Hoping Bryn has a CHLer with some finishing touch up his sleeve
  17. Yep. Lindberg and Magnussen are good pieces, but we will need a little more high-end scoring punch from our CHL adds
  18. I don't know what you technically can and cannot do in terms of contacting the players themselves, but coaches are in regular contact with players' agents about moves like this.
  19. I wonder if we called Lindberg after it became clear we weren't getting Wiebusch
  20. I've never seen a 5v3 that was focused solely on one timers. There was no attempt to set anything up except for one time blasts from way out. Didn't get that at all
  21. Klee to Notre Dame
  22. Very sad to see him go. I really liked his game a lot and I thought he could’ve been a great 4 year guy for us. I could’ve seen him wearing the “C” one day, just like he did in Muskegon
  23. Talk about great publicity. Awesome article
  24. I don't think he's a depth piece. He was ASU's TOI leader, so I doubt he would transfer to a program that planned to use him as a 6th or 7th guy
  25. Yep, which is why I'd be mildly concerned if we're seriously recruiting him. Not saying we should be sounding any alarms, just think it's something to watch
×
×
  • Create New...