The Sicatoka

Number of seats does not matter per se; however, .... The requirement for FBS (formerly DI-A) is "Once every two years on a rolling basis, the institution shall average at least 15,000 in actual or paid attendance for all home football games." See Section 20.9.7.3 of the 2007-08 NCAA DI Manual for all of the gorey details.

But there is a plan. And it's more than a plan, there are renderings. The scale of what is being talked about however is something that'd have to be done in phases.

I'll say it again: A year from now you'll Marto and LaPoint to be "veterans". The defense could well be those two, Jones, Genoway, and a bunch of freshmen. If you think skating a bunch of freshman defensemen is a good thing look at Minnesota's season so far.

1031 is more than some DI mens games out east.

Strictly speaking of the candidates I've met and dealt with during my life or time at UND*, Phyllis Johnson would be my least preferred. I wish I could've met the candidates from U Wyoming and U Florida to compare to the ones that have some UND history. * Johnson ran the Human Nutrition "Nut" Lab at UND for a while in the 1980s and 1990s.

Didn't they do that at a football game during the fall also?

The Olympic practice arena (200 x 100 sheet) between The Ralph and The Betty can hold about 1000. As far as baseball facilities making a difference (ala Newman): May 15, 2006, Minnesota wins at NDSU 11-10, attendance 503 at Newman Field. That's a little better than 10% full. That's the "most excitement" game of the year and it's really not all that much better than UND's 2006 season average of 324. The college baseball season is tough in this climate.

Well darn it, he left before he got to me. For the record, the quoted post was "puck swami", a Denver fan, and not me, although I agree with much of it. I look back at Bochenski and what I said then was: He made a mistake; let's see what he learns from it. Bochenski didn't make another public mistake. Then it was Parise (and a couple BC boys) and what I said then was: He made a mistake; let's see what he learns from it. Parise didn't make another public mistake. As far as chances, UND brought TJ in and gave him a chance. In January (2007) TJ made a mistake. UND gave him another chance. Unfortunately TJ made another public mistake. That disappointed me. And I said so. But ultimately my disappointment means exactly squat. Yup, nada. Not. A. Thing. And you heard it here first. The disappointment that matters was shown by a man who wore the jersey, Dave Hakstol, when he sat him for a game and took away captaincy. So if "credentials" are in question, question former Sioux captain Dave Hakstol's credentials. TJ disappointed the man who gave him a chance, Coach Hakstol. But he has another chance from Coach Hakstol also. I'm glad. I trust Hak.

You at "Bob's Country Bunker"?

Doing a little digging around in various UND info I've acquired I find: - UND's "pro forma" staffing budget projections include a coach, an assistant, and a grad assistant from 2008-09 through 2012-2013. (Currently it is a coach and two grad assistants.) - UND projects to have 7.5 baseball scholarships in FY13 (2012-2013 season). That's 30 "25% scholarships" for folks without a calculator handy. Even though I like the notion of lacrosse, yes, the prime issue now is finding an all sports conference home. After achieving that comes aligning specific sports to that conference (add mens tennis? add mens soccer? drop baseball? drop softball? other?). After that comes an evaluation of other possibilities under the new circumstances. I'd love to see UND Lacrosse one day, but there are bigger fish to fry first.

Maybe you can't ... I recommend everyone read what 'jimdahl' linked to and take it to heart, especially that last paragraph.

Ya know, I won't disagree with that. But I will say the following: Before you post it here ask yourself, "Would I say this to the person's face?" When you post it here, you just may have.

No Kelling in the last cut? I owe a couple "beverages" to some folks.

Here is the other thing: So do athletic directors and other administrators. I'd say if it's happened out there for all to see or in the public record it's out there for discussion. If it's a rumor (or "I know a secret" info) how do we know if it's true or if it's someone waging a smear campaign. Shouldn't the standard be to "discuss what has happened in public (or as public record)" instead of "discuss what has rumoredly happened privately or behind closed doors" to folks in visible positions in UND athletics?

From: http://www.grandforksherald.com/articles/index.cfm?id=63797 So they've effectively raised the scholarship minimum (mandatory 25% offers), added the "transfer and sit" rule (like FB, BB, and hockey), and capped rosters. With a 35 man roster you figure 7 or 8 recruits every year. If each guy has to get a 25% offer that's about 2 full scholarships for a program that only has 3. How's that going to work?

This thing just keeps getting curiouser and curiouser .... And you thought special assessments in Fargo were bad today ...

Patience. :D

Bemidji State in the WCHA? The potential of Canadian schools in the NCAA? Whispers of a "Big Ten Hockey Conference" if BSU is in the WCHA? To all of that I can only say one thing: As it may prove to be an invaluable asset to the program if there are significant shake-ups in conference alignments down the road, thank you, thank you, Mr. Engelstad for the Ralph Engelstad Arena.

Simple question: Do the actions of the WCHA leadership regarding officiating of games match the desires and words of the NCAA Rules Committee? I'm pretty sure I know my answer.

Leagues "dumping" teams makes for bad situations down the road. You reap what you sew sooner or later. A league made up of UAA, MSU-Mankato, and Bemidji State plus the rest of CHA? Who in that group could afford that travel? Alternatively, how would UND fans feel if they got a "provisional" or "associate" status in Big Ten Hockey but didn't make national tournaments (someone in league will have a losing conference record and bad RPI from it) but the winners of the now weaker WCHA and the CHA did? This problem doesn't have a simple solution. You need to think through all of the possible impacts.

A total housecleaning is impractical. With a stable full of new, untested officials, you could end up worse than where we are now. (Yes, that is possible.) The officials are willing to call the games per the rules, but that may mean some up-front pain as teams and coaches and fans adapt to the tight calling style (the NCAA's "no obstruction allowed" or the NHL's "by the book, period"). And those officials, during that time, need clear support from their supervisor and the league. I'd say they are not getting that today, at least as far as "call it tight". Hence, there is really only one option at this point: As deeply as it pains me to say it, "redwing77" has this one right on. One last note: Consistency means not only team to team, but week to week, game to game, period to period, and shift to shift. Set a standard, make it clear what it is, and stick to it.

Like I said ...

So between the DU/SCSU fiasco and now the DU/UW fiasco DU has potentially up to four points in the standings it shouldn't have. So how should a team that finishes right behind them in the final standings view this, especially if they are within four points? What if there's more than one team within that four point range? What an embarrassment. What a mess.

They were there Friday because it was a media event (CSTV national game). That should tell you everything you need to know about their passion for this "cause".

Hawai'i and Alaska have a common problem: Distance. However, they are markedly different in one key area: Caller: "Yeah, we have an open date in our football schedule the first Saturday in December." Possible Road Team: "Who is this calling again?" (this is where the scenario splits) Scenario 1 --- Caller: "The University of Hawai'i Possible Road Team: Scenario 2 --- Caller: "The University of Alaska. Possible Road Team: Fairbanks? In December? .... (dial tone)