SiouxMD Posted September 15, 2008 Share Posted September 15, 2008 Sagarin - www.usatoday.com 73 ASU (70) - Top DI-AA/FCS 112 Cal Poly (111) 132 UC Davis (145) 133 UND (134) 185 SUU (183) 200 USD (200) Week 2 in (*)'s. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bincitysioux Posted September 15, 2008 Share Posted September 15, 2008 AGS Poll 1. Appalachian St. (101) (1) 2. Richmond (13) (3) 3. North Dakota St. (5) (2) 4. Montana (5) (4) 5. James Madison (3) (8) 6. McNeese St. (1) (6) 7. Northern Iowa (5) 8. Delaware (9) 9. Cal Poly (1) (10) 10. Eastern Washington (11) 11. Wofford (12) 12. Massachusetts (7) 13. New Hampshire (1) (14) 14. South Dakota St. (15) 15. Southern Illinois (13) 16. Villanova (17) 17. Elon (18) 18. Georgia Southern (16) 19. Central Arkansas (21) 20. The Citadel (20) 21. Western Illinois (19) 22. Furman (24) 23. Eastern Illinois (22) 24. Harvard (NR) 25. Liberty (NR) Others receiving votes (minimum of 5 votes): Youngstown St. (54), Yale (36), Northern Arizona (35), Sam Houston St. (28), Eastern Kentucky (20), UC Davis (19), Hampton (18), Albany (17), Montana St. (17), South Carolina St. (17), Holy Cross (15), Fordham (11), Jacksonville St. (11), Tennessee St. (10), Univ. North Dakota (7), Dayton (6), Delaware St. (6), William & Mary (6), Prairie View A&M (5), Weber St. (5) MOST SIGNIFICANT WIN OF THE WEEK: James Madison MOST SIGNIFICANT LOSS OF THE WEEK: Massachusetts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dakotadan Posted September 15, 2008 Share Posted September 15, 2008 FCS Coaches Poll 1. Appalachian State (17) 2. North Dakota State (9) 3. Richmond 4. Montana (2) 5. James Madison 6. Delaware 7. Northern Iowa 8. McNeese State 9. Massachusetts 10. New Hampshire 11. Cal Poly 12. Wofford 13. South Dakota State T-14. Georgia Southern T-14. Southern Illinois 16. Central Arkansas 17. Eastern Washington 18. Elon 19. Villanova 20. Eastern Illinois 21. Western Illinois 22. The Citadel 23. Furman 24. Youngstown State 25. Liberty Other Receiving Votes (points in parentheses): Harvard (40), Northern Arizona (31), South Carolina State (26), Hampton (20), Jacksonville State (19), Sam Houston State (17), Delaware State (16), Montana State (15), Tennessee State (10), Maine (9), Sacramento State (8), Prairie View A&M (8), UC Davis (8), Eastern Kentucky (8), North Dakota (7), Holy Cross (6), San Diego (6), Weber State (5), Yale (4), Dayton (2), Lafayette (2), Fordham (1), Northeastern (1), Florida A&M (1). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND92,96 Posted September 15, 2008 Share Posted September 15, 2008 I still have to shake my head at the fact that South Dakota St. is presently a consensus top-15 team (and maybe better than that). John Stiegelmeier has been the head coach there since 1997, and if you look at his record, SDSU was a 7-4 type program year in and year out as an NCC school, and they've been the same as an FCS school. Stiegelmeier was 1-6 vs. UND. They also were very slow to add scholarships after going dI. So my question is, is this just one of those flukey things (a perennially unranked dII program is now a pretty strong FCS program under the same coach), or is this more or less proof that UND should be an FCS power rather quickly? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bincitysioux Posted September 15, 2008 Share Posted September 15, 2008 TSN Poll 1. Appalachian State Mountaineers (96) 1-1 2,668 1 2. Richmond Spiders (1) 2-1 2,452 4 3. North Dakota State Bison (5) 2-1 2,417 2 4. Montana Grizzlies (7) 2-0 2,355 5 5. James Madison Dukes (2) 2-1 2,294 7 6. Delaware Blue Hens (1) 1-1 2,027 6 7. McNeese State Cowboys 1-1 1,920 8 8. Northern Iowa Panthers 1-1 1,905 9 9. Massachusetts Minutemen 2-1 1,677 3 10. New Hampshire Wildcats (1) 2-0 1,535 10 11. Wofford Terriers 2-0 1,458 12 12. South Dakota State Jackrabbits 2-1 1,448 13 13. Cal Poly Mustangs 1-1 1,337 14 14. Eastern Washington Eagles 0-2 1,271 16 15. Southern Illinois Salukis 1-1 1,201 11 16. Georgia Southern Eagles 2-1 1,030 17 17. Elon Phoenix 2-1 962 18 18. Central Arkansas Bears 3-0 945 19 19. Villanova Wildcats 1-1 740 21 20. Western Illinois Leathernecks 1-2 618 15 21. The Citadel Bulldogs 1-1 445 22 22. Eastern Illinois Panthers 1-2 415 20 23. Liberty Flames 3-0 248 25 24. Furman Paladins 2-1 244 NR 25. Tennessee State Tigers 3-0 194 NR Others receiving votes: Harvard 185, Youngstown State 170, Northern Arizona 146, Delaware State 96, Yale 87, Holy Cross 86, South Carolina State 56, Jacksonville State 49, Sam Houston State 44, Prairie View 29, Norfolk State 27, Northwestern State 26, UC Davis 23, Sacramento State 22, Hampton 21, Weber State 20, Eastern Kentucky 18, San Diego 16, Dayton 15, Albany 12, Lafayette 11, Brown 10, Montana State 9, North Dakota 5, Sacred Heart 4, Florida A&M 3, Southeastern Louisiana 2, Maine 1, Nicholls State 1, William & Mary 1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bincitysioux Posted September 15, 2008 Share Posted September 15, 2008 SME Network Poll 1 vote for North Dakota Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted September 15, 2008 Share Posted September 15, 2008 I still have to shake my head at the fact that South Dakota St. is presently a consensus top-15 team (and maybe better than that). John Stiegelmeier has been the head coach there since 1997, and if you look at his record, SDSU was a 7-4 type program year in and year out as an NCC school, and they've been the same as an FCS school. Stiegelmeier was 1-6 vs. UND. They also were very slow to add scholarships after going dI. So my question is, is this just one of those flukey things (a perennially unranked dII program is now a pretty strong FCS program under the same coach), or is this more or less proof that UND should be an FCS power rather quickly? SDSU is playing well to start off this season. I don't take more out of it than that. If SDSU wins a national title or loses the rest of their games, UND will still be a good FCS team. I do think the move up has landed SDSU some better players than their d-2 days though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bincitysioux Posted September 16, 2008 Share Posted September 16, 2008 I still have to shake my head at the fact that South Dakota St. is presently a consensus top-15 team (and maybe better than that). John Stiegelmeier has been the head coach there since 1997, and if you look at his record, SDSU was a 7-4 type program year in and year out as an NCC school, and they've been the same as an FCS school. Stiegelmeier was 1-6 vs. UND. They also were very slow to add scholarships after going dI. So my question is, is this just one of those flukey things (a perennially unranked dII program is now a pretty strong FCS program under the same coach), or is this more or less proof that UND should be an FCS power rather quickly? SDSU is playing well to start off this season. I don't take more out of it than that. If SDSU wins a national title or loses the rest of their games, UND will still be a good FCS team. I do think the move up has landed SDSU some better players than their d-2 days though. I have been impressed with SDSU since they moved. While NDSU has an extremely successful transition, I have been more impressed with SDSU given the fact that as far as football goes, they weren't a world-beater in DII. Their women's basketball team has been the most successful ex-NCC team to move to DI if you ask me. I like to think that it just means that the top half of the NCC, pre-2002, were very very good in DII. I don't think that it is a cooincidence that UNC is the former NCC team of the first three to move that has struggled so badly. UNC, at best, is the 5th most significant university in Colorado. NDSU, SDSU, UND, and USD could all be considered "flagships", and really are the only thing going in North Dakota and South Dakota. I think that has done wonders for recruiting. When it all comes down to it, the players for any given school are the reason for whatever type of success is acheived. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND92,96 Posted September 16, 2008 Share Posted September 16, 2008 Sagarin - www.usatoday.com 73 ASU (70) - Top DI-AA/FCS 112 Cal Poly (111) 132 UC Davis (145) 133 UND (134) 185 SUU (183) 200 USD (200) Week 2 in (*)'s. I have no idea how Sagarin's computer rankings work, but it's amazing to me that he has UND at #22 among all FCS schools considering our schedule so far. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimdahl Posted September 16, 2008 Share Posted September 16, 2008 I have no idea how Sagarin's computer rankings work, but it's amazing to me that he has UND at #22 among all FCS schools considering our schedule so far. While you and I know before the season begins that beating SCSU should give you less credit than beating Ohio St, a strictly mathematical model that only examined this season wouldn't. To interject some of that human-like intuition and produce a somewhat meaningful ranking from week 1, most of them initialize each team with some credit for last year's results. I don't have the numbers in front of me, but wouldn't be at all surprised to learn that UND finished around the 23rd FCS school last season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiouxMD Posted September 16, 2008 Author Share Posted September 16, 2008 I have no idea how Sagarin's computer rankings work, but it's amazing to me that he has UND at #22 among all FCS schools considering our schedule so far. If you really want to be amazed take a look at the Massey Ratings. Top rated team is Monmouth (DIII). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hansel Posted September 16, 2008 Share Posted September 16, 2008 I have no idea how Sagarin's computer rankings work, but it's amazing to me that he has UND at #22 among all FCS schools considering our schedule so far. Sagarin only counts games against DI teams- therefore in his eyes UND is "0-0" this year. I don't know how he set your preseason rating (which would be your current rating) as well. Generally after 5 games/weeks the major rankings- sag, massey etc, are based entirely off the current season's results. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UND92,96 Posted September 16, 2008 Share Posted September 16, 2008 Sagarin only counts games against DI teams- therefore in his eyes UND is "0-0" this year. I don't know how he set your preseason rating (which would be your current rating) as well. Generally after 5 games/weeks the major rankings- sag, massey etc, are based entirely off the current season's results. So I'm assuming that basically UND's current ranking is based almost entirely on the Southern Utah win last year, possibly along with the fact that Western Washington beat UC-Davis, and UND beat Western Washington last year? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bincitysioux Posted September 17, 2008 Share Posted September 17, 2008 We've been getting a handful of votes in a few of the significant polls since the season started. I wonder how much a win against ISU would help us creep closer to the Top 25. Apparently, our reputation as a Top 10 DII program has given us some steam with the voters so far this season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.