seeboys Posted February 26, 2008 Posted February 26, 2008 I actually forgot they still had to go to court until i read this! http://www.in-forum.com/Sports/articles/192994 Quote
SiouxCrioux1 Posted February 26, 2008 Posted February 26, 2008 I actually forgot they still had to go to court until i read this! http://www.in-forum.com/Sports/articles/192994 Wow that was about the most pointless article ive ever seen. But I guess that's what you gotta expect from the Forum. They would rather dwell on that than actually talk about something good that NDSU has done lately. That is if they have. Quote
Melvin Posted February 26, 2008 Posted February 26, 2008 Must be a slow news day if they have to bring up old news. I would be willing to bet if the charges are dropped you won't see hardly a word. Quote
siouxforeverbaby Posted February 27, 2008 Posted February 27, 2008 the same article was in the Herald with no more information. It isn't really old news as they were suppose to be heard on Monday but that didn't happen with the new judge request. Quote
HeidiSioux62 Posted February 27, 2008 Posted February 27, 2008 Guess they take "taking a leak in public" just as serious in Latvia. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23258978/ Quote
RedFrog Posted February 27, 2008 Posted February 27, 2008 Why was this going in front of a District judge? Should it not have been in front of a Municipal judge? Couple explanations would be like who arrested them, a Deputy or a PD Officer? Maybe in Forks the District judges handle Municipal court too? Disorderly Conduct is a B-Misdemeanor in Grand Forks, right? Just wondering. Quote
DAR Posted February 27, 2008 Posted February 27, 2008 They should make that guy from UNH have to appear in person. He can pay his own way and stay at the Select Inn. Quote
AZSIOUX Posted February 27, 2008 Posted February 27, 2008 sweet info on these articles, when does tj go to san quentin for his life sentance maybe they will let him out to play a few games with the sioux and he blues if he gets out for good behavior....the whole thing is s f'n joke Quote
HeidiSioux62 Posted February 27, 2008 Posted February 27, 2008 Why was this going in front of a District judge? Should it not have been in front of a Municipal judge? Couple explanations would be like who arrested them, a Deputy or a PD Officer? Maybe in Forks the District judges handle Municipal court too? Disorderly Conduct is a B-Misdemeanor in Grand Forks, right? Just wondering. There was a blurb in the Herald sometime last week that said the case was being moved from municipal court to district court. It didn't give any explanation for the move - maybe had something to do with TJ still being on probation. Quote
RedFrog Posted February 27, 2008 Posted February 27, 2008 There was a blurb in the Herald sometime last week that said the case was being moved from municipal court to district court. It didn't give any explanation for the move - maybe had something to do with TJ still being on probation. A lot of times the cause for this can be that, since they plead not-guilty, they requested a jury trial. Jury trials are only held in District court. Municipal court only has bench trials(judge is the jury). Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.