cberkas

Huska was gassed by the time the second goal was scored.

You'd think so.

Agree, still should have got Tomek in there to get some shots against Canada.

That has to be the end of Huska.

First goal looked like it was right under the bar blocker side. Thats my thought too Tomek to start the third, get him in now with the game out of reach.

The first goal was the only one I'd say he had no chance to stop.

Not sure how long Huska is going to be in this game. 3-0 Canada

He could still play.

Jost with an assist

Finland out plays Denmark, shots 36-10, and loses to Denmark 3-2.

Tomek is the backup against Canada

And so is Russia, except Russia is up 3-0 in the first.

They take too many penalties the good teams will get the US to take penalties, they only had a 1 goal lead until the end of the 2nd.

I don't see the USA getting medal

#2 got crushed behind the net.

I wouldn't worry about Idaho, they have had only 4 good seasons ever in football. This year would be their fourth.

UNLV will be the next school to make the jump, all the pieces are there and Foley will help out on the financial side. It would be cool if the Engelstads have been aproched by Khan about the hockey program. I do agree that a big re-alignment isn't happening soon.

Oklahoma and Central Oklahoma have been pretty good lately.

The NCHC could have series like Hockey East. If the NCHC grows to 16 teams they could have two different teams on the same weekend and the games could be worth two games in conference points. That's if those teams only play once a year. Now 4 of those teams are in the PAC12, so they would go to a PAC12 conference when they have 6 teams. If I was the PAC12 I'd wait until they have 8 teams before starting a conference. We've all seen how starting a conference with 6 teams has worked for the B1G. There are teams that will end up in the WCHA even if they would want to be in the NCHC. The NCHC could have taken ASU and Mankato but they didn't. They wanted ASU and not Mankato, but didn't want an odd number of teams. The NCHC conference tournament would be in St.Paul at the X, that move will happen soon. At some point the NCAA tournament will have to expand. The easy way to do that is add two more teams to each regional giving the #1 and #2 seeds in each regional a bye.

The MAC has had 4 hockey teams and they could have tried to create a MAC hockey conference but that didn't happen. One minute it's a new CCHA conference headed by a MAC school now it's a MAC conference.

The NCHC isn't worried about Miami and Western Michigan leaving for a hypothetical CCHA. The buyout is there to keep Miami or Western Michigan form leaving the NCHC, the buyout is there more to keep North Dakota and Denver from leaving the NCHC for the B1G. The only way those two leave for the B1G is if the get B1G Network money. Alabama has made it known what conference they want to be in without saying anything. Alabama fan base has said they want to be in the NCHC. The only way Alabama would want to be in the WCHA is to play UAH 4 times a year. Buffalo would join the AHA. Syracuse who would be a good add to the NCHC, but would be most likely added to Hockey East.

There is none.

I don't know where the Rutgers hockey GM came up with Colorado looking to move up. Once there is a mention of a ACHA team looking to move up to NCAA hockey, Rutgers is there to talk about how they are looking to move up.

I just saw the most ridiculous elbowing penalty. Crosby gets hit in the face with Dumolin's stick and Hartnell gets a penalty for elbowing Crosby, all while Dumolin has Hartnell pined to the boards.

I am surprised that Idaho has only had 4 years ever that they were good at football. I'm hoping that Idaho get beaten badly when they join the Big Sky just to prove that they never belonged in the FBS.