Oh I thought you were trying to justify having a pk in the 70's. I'm teasing, in all honestly a lot has to do with bad luck. Because anything in the 70s is very very very bad.
Everyone keeps saying we lost a lot of players....and we did. But Denver lost a ton of players too...and they aren't as deep of a team as we typically are.
Don't agree with that. Not ready to give up on him yet. I didn't notice him much last night but did see a post and a nice hit.
I would say over Bowen. That smith kid has grown on me.
Not if all the shots are from the perimeter and he's getting great looks......your second sentence.
Guys this isn't a witch hunt against Cam nor do I think he should sit. I can think of one really bad goal all year (1st shorty against Duluth). Other posters were throwing Cam under the bus regarding the first goal Saturday night and I was there sticking up for him (because it was a point blank shot).
My point was that the guy hasnt been tested all that much because our D last year was generational. I can think of maybe one college team (Goofs in 2002 or 2003) that had a more loaded college D core. When your D is that loaded goalies just dont get tested often...that's a fact.
I never said he wasn't a good goalie....however a 93.5% isnt just good, it's great. It's great because of the fact he is a good goalie and had a jacked up D core.
I like Cam....but to be honest a TON of what went into his godly numbers had to do with our jacked up D core last year. Wolanin was rotating in last year.....that's pretty crazy because he's very good.
I honestly think we sweep this week (if we have a full lineup).