scpa0305

Not sure if it's because I watch the Blackhawks (and coach Q), but these guys need a line shuffle in the worst way.

No they didn't....we've both lost a lot since last year.

Oh I thought you were trying to justify having a pk in the 70's. I'm teasing, in all honestly a lot has to do with bad luck. Because anything in the 70s is very very very bad.

We were at 78.8 prior to he last penalty....per my tv screen. But....90 is what you shoot for. My point was that our pk is a hot mess.

Our pk is 79....and that's beyond garbage.

Everyone keeps saying we lost a lot of players....and we did. But Denver lost a ton of players too...and they aren't as deep of a team as we typically are.

Where's the D, that was ugly

11

Better get off here

I must be behind too

Worst pk in the history of hockey

My stream has froze 3 times so far.

Don't agree with that. Not ready to give up on him yet. I didn't notice him much last night but did see a post and a nice hit. I would say over Bowen. That smith kid has grown on me.

Agree with a lot of what u posted. I also think yon should play. Not sure where though.

Definitely agree on the release part....needs to get quicker. its been pretty cool offensively lately

Brock's trying to do too much and jost isn't getting involved. Jost needs to lead his own line. Split them up at even strength

What?

Is the game on in Fargo?

I haven't seen two breakaways in 30 seconds since pee wees

I would have flipped smith with Olson.

Who was in this kids corner? Curious to know who his advisor was.

They won't have the high end offensive ability though. Won't skate as well either.

Not if all the shots are from the perimeter and he's getting great looks......your second sentence. Guys this isn't a witch hunt against Cam nor do I think he should sit. I can think of one really bad goal all year (1st shorty against Duluth). Other posters were throwing Cam under the bus regarding the first goal Saturday night and I was there sticking up for him (because it was a point blank shot). My point was that the guy hasnt been tested all that much because our D last year was generational. I can think of maybe one college team (Goofs in 2002 or 2003) that had a more loaded college D core. When your D is that loaded goalies just dont get tested often...that's a fact.

And my point was that he achieved the 93.5%, in large part, because of those dmen. It's not a knock on him.

I never said he wasn't a good goalie....however a 93.5% isnt just good, it's great. It's great because of the fact he is a good goalie and had a jacked up D core.