watchmaker49

You have not "marginalized" nothing. To deny that Grand Forks and the state of North Dakota is not racist is hilarious. That is like saying Sheriff Paul Babeau deals with facts.

You just can not get the fact that the game did not change after November 30th, 2010. The outcome was decided a long time before this and you chose to try running with the big dogs while you all were still pissing like a puppy. Then one day you realized that you were just the little pissing puppy and the big dogs left you behind to sniff at their piles. Only then did you finally come to the conclusion that damn they really are going to teach us a serious lesson on the pecking order of life and found out that you did not matter. Then it became now we have to save the university and forget that we all helped getting the unversity into the mess.

Yes there were direct threats towards the university by not understanding the pecking order. Well at least I don't change who I am or what I believe to be accepted by the rest of the group.

No that is how you spin away your previous inolvement without taking ownership. There were no real options 8 years ago and the people that understood the reality of the situation saw this. You guys put on the blinders and charged at the windmills until you saw that it was not going to work years later and then pretended in your own self-rightous way that you are now leading the good fight. How long ago was it when your god sent out the email on his UND account in support of Al Carlson and his law? Were you not singing his praises at the time? Hmmm now we can just forget that all of you did that?

Are you saying that I dealt drugs to do this? Are you still beating your kids?

Just because the goal is the same the reason for trying to reach the goal are different. Furthermore, why did you always attack people who were saying for years what you have only been saying for a month?

Somewhat funny is all of you sat on the other side with DaveK, Fetch, and Chewey when we tried to tell you what would happen and you dismissed us. Now you are singing the same song we sang and pretend you wrote the lyrics.

If only you guys had made this arguement 8 years ago instead of talking tough we would not be where we are today. Take ownership of the problem you helped create instead of being the savoir today. None of you have ever taken any responsibility for helping create this fiasco.

Touche.

Haven't we heard the same thing about other recruits before?

Never say never but you would think it would suck to play for your dad.

Very good point.

My bad. Thank you though for the quick responce.

Have these kids actually signed to play or only given verbal? The reason I am asking with Steve having become the new asst. at Omaha, and heir to the head job, could these kids end up there instead?

ScottM you know people have filed suits over these things. I said he could, like others have, but I do not agree with people filing theses suits. Though your comment that I referred to did lack class.

All you taught your daughter was daddy is an unfair jerk trying to show off to the other parents. I see you avoided what you would have done to a different kid though. In poker that is called a tell. And you sir a 2 cent wannabe coach. The job no one else's egos needed pumpin up to take. Loser? That is why I have the cash and assests to be able to sit around the pool all afternoon in Phoenix and enjoy life? I have been watching and researching sport parents for years. I have more respect for the meth head in jail than these ego driven parents. How many varsity sports did you or your wife ever play?

Still can not dispute what I said I see. Tell me how Fetch would not have a libel case against you? I get absract concepts quite well. I just take it to the next step which can not be taught in law school.

I see you came back. Ever talk with your family about your attitude? If another girl had missed practice would they had to sit out or apologize? I doubt it since you would not have known why they missed and their parents would have been all over you. They could have made up any excuse that they wanted and you would have had to go along. So better words you treated your own daughter differently as a coach than the rest of the team. What I do know though is human nature and how people would/will react to different scenarios. Look at how well I have been able to toy with you and you followed right along.

Yep.

Dispute what I wrote inlieu of your smarterthaneveryone additude. That is the same additude that got this lawyer in Vegas in the soup now isn't it? Everyday I see the lawyering being done by those who claim to know what they are doing and lose.

Some of us understood a long time ago what the consequnces would be and got it. People like you denied for years that there would be consequences and whoops there are going to be severe ramifications and now you change your story. Because you lived in such denial for so long and now have changed "your mind" yes that does make you a "hypocrit". Definition of HYPOCRITE 1 : a person who puts on a false appearance of virtue or religion 2 : a person who acts in contradiction to his or her stated beliefs or feelings

That is why in a court room there are winners and losers and when one lawyer always thinks he is right he is proven he is not quite often. You know darn well that if he sued you he has a very good chance of winning. Since you most likely are sitting at your desk posting would that not possibly bring your firm into the matter also? Furthermore, if the person in Vegas calling themselves lawyer on the comment links was not scared, as the article alluded to, why try and hide? Abbatangelo added that "disclosure of his or her identity would effectively ruin 'Lawyer's' career. He or she would be reported to the bar, likely suspended, and not able to practice." This is coming from the defense lawyer and not the plantiff's. Better words the guy who wrote the comments is very scared of facing the consequences of what he wrote.

http://www.lvrj.com/news/anonymous-lawyer-may-be-revealed-156105895.html

Yeah and against only certain people.

I would suggest you research a case working in Las Vegas about reveling a posters real name because the people he defamed want to sue him/her and all actors involved are lawyers. Furthermore, I suggest you research laws on libel even on the internet and how they have changed because of actions like yours. Do you really think I would have said it without understanding what I was saying and have read about similar lawsuits being filed and won by the plantiff?