Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

SIOUXFAN97

Members
  • Posts

    15,302
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    62

Posts posted by SIOUXFAN97

  1. 59 minutes ago, JohnboyND7 said:

    I don't think its probably very hard to get the committee on board with Montana.

    - Nice stadium.  Looks good on TV.  Probably a decent number of fans will be there.

    Big Sky is a prime conference to set up with non-bus games, there are basically none available. Isn't everyone west of  Grand Forks (other than some TX schools) in the Big Sky?  No opportunity for bus games in the west.

    doesn't matter ...shouldn't matter....

     

  2. 5 minutes ago, petey23 said:

    With regionalization and allowing teams to buy their way into the playoffs and changing criteria on a whim the NCAA has basically seeded the tournament as follows

    #17 St. Francis(9-2) at #16 Delaware(7-4)

    #18 Davidson(8-3) at #15 Richmond(8-3)

    #19 SEMO(9-2) at #14 Montana(7-4)

    20 UND(7-4) at #13 Weber State(9-2)

    #21 Garner-Webb(6-5) at #12 Eastern Kentucky(7-4)

    #22 Idaho(7-4) at #11 SE Lousianna(8-3)

    #23 Elon(8-3) at #10 Furman(9-2)

    #24 Fordham(9-2) at #9 New Hampshire(8-3)

     

     

     

    too easy...try again

  3. Just now, UND08 said:

    WE (as in UND) certainly DO NOT need to get an attorney involved in anything regarding the NCAA for a long long loooooooongggg time!

    I'd prefer to say the hell with regionalization and just seed the whole thing 1-24.  But then again I also feel like too many teams make the playoffs.  In a sport where guys lay their bodies on the line every week, I feel like every team picked should have a legit shot of winning the title.  That would mean like 8-12 teams in the FCS playoffs.  I know I'm in the minority on that opinion...but it is what it is.

    agreed ...should be 16...seeded....higher seed hosts...pretty darn simple 

    • Upvote 3
  4. 3 minutes ago, Sioux94 said:

    Well at least we finally got proof in black and white that we got screwed!  Not that the team should need any extra motivation....but time to head into that game with a FU attitude!! 

    if they are gonna cheat we will cheat.....sub will ratelle for aftroman and let him plug the hole...have jimmy k sub in for zalvaney....cheaters gonna cheat.

  5. 5 minutes ago, forksandspoons said:

    Montana gets a home game against a conference champ with a 9-2 record, contradicting what the committee chair said in Miller’s article. 
     

     

    so miller should call up someone on the committee to get a rebuttal...and so forth and so forth.

  6. 1 minute ago, geaux_sioux said:

    Also credit to Tom Miller for legit journalism and a lightning quick turnaround on this story.

    herder still sucking weiners on twitter...

    • Upvote 1
  7. this just legitimizes why most people see the FCS as a joke and the NDAC "dynasty" as rigged if this is the stuff that is happening behind closed doors....

    total joke

     

  8. 1 minute ago, jdub27 said:

    Someone tell Dom there is no 9 seed. It is in the manual that the committee was supposed to follow. There are only 8.

    And I'd be curious what "close enough" means in his book. 

    remember to dom and kolpack...close enough is their standard answer when they lie and say their 6'1" on tinder

  9. Just now, Siouxperfan7 said:

    Clearly bids don't mean anything.  If you are going to award teams based off "team performance" than just seed every team in the filed to remove all doubt.

    that's too easy or the bean counters that like playing god

  10. 5 minutes ago, dmksioux said:

    THIS! 

    I'd love to hear Truax try to explain this one.

    NCAA still has it in for UND, simple as that.

    yep...

    once the ncca people say xyz is why weber gets the home game....show them montanta's credentials and just sit back and listen...then go after em like a good journalist should tom or schloss

    even use the karl rove grease board to make it sink in

    • Upvote 2
×
×
  • Create New...