Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

redwing77

Members
  • Posts

    11,065
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by redwing77

  1. Toews from Stafford and Duncan I think.
  2. TOEWS SCORES!!!!!
  3. Fletcher gets called. Sioux PP Can we get something going? Can we finish?
  4. Wow. Oshie and Zajac makes something happen and the result? Nothing. I don't know about this.... We're not finishing at all.
  5. We're starting to get desperate. And we're rushing things now. SCSU is getting the better chances.
  6. 3rd period is on. Time to get serious. All the shots in the world don't mean for crap if you can't put one behind the goaltender.
  7. I called the Badgers as sucking and they took offense. Nice.
  8. 1 player is changed in the lineup and EVERYONE starts to suck hardcore. GOD I love having two good goaltenders.
  9. End of 2. Let's review 3rd period strategy: SCORE A DAMN GOAL! NO MORE FREAKING WHIFFS!!!!!! Jeepers, Goephert isn't beating the Sioux, the whiffs are.
  10. Kaip pushed Kronick into Lammy who went into the net. That's as much as I know from the radio. BS call, but that happens.
  11. WOW. Those whiffs looking bad now. 1-0 SCSU
  12. GOAL?!?!?!?!
  13. Maybe a SCSU goal?
  14. Kaip goes for Slashing.
  15. Comon!!!!!!!!! (Sioux PP not sagard's comment.)
  16. Penalty on Raduns.
  17. What is it now? If we didn't whiff now it would be 6-0? I know they can't help it, but the amount of whiffs is getting to be frustrating.
  18. So is the question going to be: Which team is going to have a player that isn't going to whiff first? TH is calling SCSU Minnesota State. Too many men on SCSU!
  19. Is this Sioux hockey or is the Wild playing the Wild? NO offense....
  20. Follow the bouncing puck. It's amazing how much bouncing the puck is doing around Goephert.
  21. Let's get something going. We can't keep getting chances like we did in Period 1 and not bury one.
  22. Killed off. Good kill.
  23. Comon Sioux, kill it off.
  24. It is unacceptable too!
  25. Several comments some already stated by others: 1. The DS article comes across as adversarial to me. No one has ever succeeded in something of this kind of thing (relatively minor (if at all) compared to Gandhi or King). We don't have the leverage and we don't have the public support either. Work WITH the AD, not AGAINST him. In emails I've been corresponding with him (slowly but surely) and he's said that moving the student section is a definite possibility. So he's listening. 2. Math classes are good. He should take them sometime 3. LeftZL is right about the usher quality. Most could care less because these are people coming in and leaving that pay the "big bucks" and they don't want to upset them, even if it is supporting the rules. As for security, most of the security are placed around the student section. Debate if that's a good or a bad thing however you wish, but with all the security around the students, shouldn't they be able to do something? And, even if they are, what about the rest of the arena?
×
×
  • Create New...