Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

siouxweet

Members
  • Posts

    4,749
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by siouxweet

  1. Ed Schultz is a putz and forever will be. how much does his "contracting" company actually make in a year? it probably isn't doing too well to have rely on Obama's "small" business tax break.
  2. I'll add Wisconsin and Denver to that list after watching their game last night. so where will that leave us in the WCHA: cc-better than us denver-better than us msu-mankato-better than us minnesota-better than us wisconsin-better than us st. cloud-better than us. duluth-not sure but they have won a game this year tech-not sure but they have won a game this year aa-same as duluth and tech honestly INCH may very well be right and could finish 7-10.
  3. agreed. I hope I'm wrong about tonight but I think the odds are greater we get swept than we don't. there tends to be a pattern with hak's teams in the ridiculous slow starts-they tend to hit rock bottom by getting swept in series us fans think they shouldn't get swept because afterall they are the sioux. jan of 2006-get swept at home versuses st. cloud, nov and december 2006-get swept at aa,split with cc,get swept by wisc and get swept by tech both at home. heading into this season no one would have thought that we would have started out 0-4, but the possibility is very real with how this team is performing. if you can't score,defend or have a goalie that can't stop much you are not going to win very much. this year's goalie excuse-they are not getting much help-however the goalie still needs to stop something on a consistent basis and neither of these guys can do that right now. I also thought that this could be a rebuilding year and we would struggle a bit-then with duncan,kozek and finley coming back along with 5 defenseman that played a lot last year bought into the hype of this could be a good team. right now I'm totally disaapointed and coming to the realization that this will be a very,very long year-along the lines of 2001-02. it's been a fun ride the last four years-bright side is I guess I won't be needing to dish out thousands of dollars to travel to a frozen four and watch them get spanked again.
  4. 6-5 du wins. I was impressed with both teams. Du is loaded has some goaltending issues but can make up for that by scoring a ton of goals. sconnie has a young defense but they can put the puck in the net.
  5. good to hear.
  6. 6-5 du.
  7. for a defensive minded team sconnie has scored 10 goals in 2+ games and we've scored 4 in 3 for a supposedly offensive minded team.
  8. hey Bob how is your son doing?
  9. 5-4 sconnie now.
  10. 4-4 now.
  11. one game does not but we are 0-3.
  12. those are the only two things they hang banners in the ralph for. if my memory serves me correct we haven't done either of those things in the past four years and if things don't get straightened out in a hurry it will be five years and counting.
  13. I was trying the old reverse phsycolgy thing. evidently that doesn't work either.
  14. but we never started out 0-3.
  15. how about benching coaches. whoever is in charge of defense and special teams should be benched.
  16. wisc 4 du 1 late in 2nd.
  17. I might not be that far off
  18. this is not a very good team right now. I don't want to hear anyone say this is a good team just give them time. good teams do not start out the year 0-3. in fact can someone name the last national champion to start out the year 0-3, I can't. sounds like they spent a week of extra practice on special teams for nothing. this is fricking pathetic.
  19. can we start declining pp's this is ridiculous? I might not be far off of my sarcastic 1 for 24. doesn't look like all this practice time spent on special teams is paying dividends both ways.
  20. why is it that we get a ton of shots on goal but the majority of them are right into the center of the goalies chest? it makes it awfully difficult to score when you can't find a corner.
  21. problem is we could be 2-6 by the time we start to get is figured out.
  22. will there be a webcast?
  23. I see hillary as sec. of state. but the rest I agree with.
  24. I wouldn't mind seeing a Herb Brooks approach with a few"again" and "again" crunchers.
×
×
  • Create New...