[And then there were three....]

There is a runoff because none of the choices reached the 50% mark. 
In the runoff, the winner doesn't have to reach the 50% mark. 

With how the rules are currently amended, why is there a runoff?

Agreed. The whole point of the runoff was to get a name to 50%. Now that they've abandoned that principle, why not just declare Fighting Hawks the winner, as it had a clear lead over the other two? What's the point of seeing how the Sundogs and Northstars votes get distributed across the remaining three, but not seeing how the Nodaks votes would get distributed across Roughriders and Fighting Hawks.

[And then there were three....]

The problem is that it doesn't matter what they claim is the planned process anymore when they're obviously willing to modify the process based on how they feel about the result of the vote. They're going to have us all vote again, eyeball the numbers, and decide what to do then.

[Vote for the final 3]

It's about getting the right name, not following an arbitrary process or keeping the number of votes to 2 or below. Allowing 5  names the last vote was a mistake and it will take extra elections to mitigate that mistake, but it is the right thing to do. 

But what's the "right name"? The process really defines that, and changing the process can change the outcome.

[Vote for the final 3]

I wonder if this will look much different than the poll of 5 on this site, given that sundogs and northstars barely registered in that one.

Or does the changing of the rules mid-game and strength of Fighting Hawks in the first balloting change anyone's opinion?

 

[Predict the outcome]

I would guess Nodaks doesn't do as well in the general population as it's doing here, again because the general population wasn't in on the debate that led to its recent surge. Instead, a neutral person looking at the ballot should have a reaction to Nodaks much more like most of us did back in July.

...

But, I wouldn't be shocked if Fighting Hawks (or one of the others) displaced one of them.

Heard it here first 

Can't believe they broke their own rules to let the establishment favorite #3 vote getter in... I used to be among those defending the process.

[Nickname Vote: Exit Poll]

not sure if I'm exactly following but what i meant was that I expected rough riders to lead this poll by double digits. Given that it is really close I am somewhat shocked. From what I've gathered there is a large nodak push and many of those folks don't come on this site. At least the ones I know.

Trying to explain differently, it's reasonable to guess that people on this site are the ones who most closely follow UND athletics, social media, etc..., so are more likely to jump on the late breaking Nodaks trend then a random alum in Florida who just got his ballot in his email and never heard any of that.

But, we're all just guessing. We all agree that people who voted in this poll might not be representative of the 80,000 who got to vote, so we're trying to guess in what ways the real outcome might differ.

[NORTH DAKOTA @ Vermont - Friday Gameday]

It's too early for pairwise to be that relevant. It's going to fluctuate a lot until more games are played. 

PWR doesn't even really exist yet -- as long as there are teams with undefined RPIs (which there are still about half a dozen), the PWR calculations aren't stable.

[Nickname Vote: Exit Poll]

rough riders has lead every poll on this site by a wide margin, until now.

I think the hypothesis is that people on this site are far more aware than the general public of Nodaks' late push so Nodak would have risen more here than in the general public. We certainly saw posts in this thread where people said Nodaks wasn't their favorite, but they voted for it so as not to throw away their vote.

I'm among those who wonder if the actual result could be noticeably different from this poll, particularly in the "bottom 3" which received almost no votes here showing more strength (again, because people here gravitated toward the perceived winners). It'll be interesting to see what the final result is.

[Vote on your final 5 nickname choices (just ND is out)]

I think a thing the "Teddy wasn't from ND" crowd is missing is that fans didn't latch onto Roughriders because of our own personal opinions about how connected Teddy was to ND.

Rather, I like the idea of the state's namesake public university having a nickname that matches a state motto or slogan (e.g. the Wolverine State, the Badger State, the Gopher State). RR detractors have pointed out that ND isn't officially the Rough Rider State, but it is one of the nicknames associated with the state, listed on nd.gov, used in its highest award, highway signs, businesses, etc...

So, trying to convince RR supporters that Teddy isn't associated with ND is tilting at windmills, proponents are latching on to the association that the state itself has promoted for decades. That's why Rough Riders came up as an early favorite and consistently polled near the top long before this formal process began.

[Vote on your final 5 nickname choices (just ND is out)]

if RR, I like the idea of Teddy-less logos.   Not that I have anything against Teddy, but I prefer that this evoke the image of a roughrider in general, rather than 1 man.  Someone else said it and I agree, Teddy-like logos look cartoonish.  I think more general associations lead to better logo opportunities

Yeah, imagine a Brien-style serious cowboy face as a logo (I'm essentially picturing the Sioux head, but a cowboy). I think I could really like that. To be fair, that could also work for Nodaks.

[Predict the outcome]

Here's my take -- as I said at the beginning, we all agree that the polls here aren't representative. So, the game is try to figure out how the population of 80,000 voters differs from us.

Anyone who bothers to register for an account on this forum is paying a lot more attention to UND athletics than the average eligible voter. So, I'll guess that the average voter would be less influenced than us by the debates and trends that have moved names up and down the last few months. So, I'll guess that the first round voting looks a lot more like the poll from the summer, which was our first reactions to the names:

We've seen people here say that their first choice was North Stars / Fighting Hawks / Sundogs, but that they voted Nodaks or Roughriders so as not to waste their vote. I don't think that trend carries into the general population, so I think those three do better than they're doing in our exit poll. The question is does one of them rise up enough to take #1 or #2 (assuming a runoff). 

I would guess Nodaks doesn't do as well in the general population as it's doing here, again because the general population wasn't in on the debate that led to its recent surge. Instead, a neutral person looking at the ballot should have a reaction to Nodaks much more like most of us did back in July. The question is how many not-paying-attention alums saw some of the Herald's publicity push for Nodaks and latched onto it.

Roughriders is a tricky one. I think North Dakotans in general have an initial positive reaction because of the association with the state and it has an advantage being the only nickname that's a person. But, while most of us brush off the Grand Forks high school angle as unimportant, I wonder if that's more of a factor in Grand Forks (I'm hypothesizing that the voting pool is more Grand Forks-centric than this forum).

It seems like Nodaks should've picked up some ground, even among the general voting pool, so a Roughriders / Nodaks runoff still seems like the safest place to put your money. But, I wouldn't be shocked if Fighting Hawks (or one of the others) displaced one of them.

[Will SiouxSports.com change names?]

Bump.

Damn near made it those 4 years, too.   

Have any domain names been 'provisionally' locked down yet?

This announcement may well be the least controversial and most anticipated nickname-related development around here in a long time.  Maybe we can even rally around it.

Only due to me being really slow. I had an interim name (just related to UND, not any of the five finalists) ready to go, but was trying to time it to coincide with some redesign work. When I still wasn't ready to go a year or so ago, I decided there was no point moving to interim name for just one year, so we're now officially waiting for a new nickname.

But the broad principle is still the same -- I want the site to be recognizably associated with UND athletics, so we won't stick with Sioux for long once a new name is chosen. Four more years at the most

[Predict the outcome]

I've noticed a lot of predictions in other threads about what the voting tally will be (not who you want to win, but what you think will happen).

Brad's hallway poll of student athletes probably isn't a representative sample. Even the people voting here certainly aren't representative of the 80,000 eligible.

So, what do you think the outcome will be and why?

[Nickname Vote: Exit Poll]

So when this is all said and done....when does the transition to the new nickname (logo) actually begin to take place? Has this been stated anywhere?

It was stated in a different thread back in the Summer the fix was in, everyone on campus supported North Stars, and that Twamley had already begun preparations for the transition. I assume it will be liking flipping a switch, we'll wake up Monday morning to find all of the Sioux gear in our closets has been replaced with North Stars gear.

[Washington Post: North Dakota nice to North Dakota mean]

‘North Dakota nice’ to ‘North Dakota mean': The bruising battle over a university’s new nickname

 

Three years ago, after a long, losing battle with the NCAA, the voters of North Dakota decided in a referendum that “The Fighting Sioux” had to go as the official team name and logo for the state’s flagship University of North Dakota in Grand Forks. Since then, the teams have gone officially nameless, just “UND” or “North Dakota.”

And that turns out to be just the way plenty of UND boosters like it, mostly, it seems, as a form of protest. “If it can’t be Sioux then no other name will do,” said one of thousands of North Dakotans asked by the University for suggestions. 

[College Hockey Vs FCS Football]

[Non-UND FCS Thread]

This thread still isn't about hockey vs I-AA, thanks

[Nickname Vote: Exit Poll]

I trust you both realize that the particular poster "revealed" that information in posts he wrote during the past 2-3 months.  I'm glad, we're in agreement that no forum rules have been broken here.  Thanks, guys.

It was a personal attack (clearly posted to disparage), and it was revealing personal information about another poster. Please avoid such in the future, and please stop debating moderation policy in this thread -- it's off topic; take it to PM or here.

[Nickname Vote: Exit Poll]

If I insinuated that he had a drug and alcohol problem and made a series of poor life-choice decisions that resulted in his lack of home equity, that would be attacking his personal life.  Merely stating one's age, type of dwelling, and his admission that he trolls people on the internet is not an attack.

The forum rules are actually pretty explicit:

• No revealing private information about others (without their consent or their having already revealed it)

Please desist from posting personal information about other posters. Thanks.

[Non-UND FCS Thread]

Get back on topic.  This is a football thread.  This is a non-UND thread.

What he said. Please stop talking UND/hockey in this thread. There's a separate forum for that. Thanks!

[University of north dakota fighting nodaks]

I voted for Nodaks.  Posted yesterday in the Exit Poll forum.

I just hate and am disappointed in the reasoning why the hockey teams want Nodaks.  They couldn't care less about the name itself. 

Agreed - there's nothing wrong with liking Nodaks for what it is.

The problem with voting for Nodaks solely as a proxy for no nickname is that the school will then be stuck with it for a very long time. Had the no nickname movement succeeded, it would've left open the possibility for future stakeholders to revisit the decision and perhaps decide it was time for a new nickname in 10 years. However, with Nodaks in place, that's much less likely.

Voting for Nodaks because it's perceived as not displacing Fighting Sioux probably isn't in the best interest of the school. But there's nothing wrong with voting for Nodaks because you think it's the best of the nickname options.

[Nickname Vote: Exit Poll]

Even with this poll just open for a day, it's interesting to see how it differs from a similar poll with the same five choices started in July (http://forum.siouxsports.com/topic/20657-vote-on-your-final-5-nickname-choices-just-nd-is-out/). 

Not surprisingly given the recent PR blitz, Nodaks has gained a lot of ground. But, surprisingly not at the expense of Roughriders. Instead all of the other choices have completely withered away. Fighting Hawks and North Stars, each previously claimed to be generating buzz among students on campus, aren't even in the running here.

It will be interesting to see the outcome of the real polling.

[How does the Popularity thing work ?]

When there are 150 new posts and I like 11 of them, why can I only up vote 10?

I'm not sure, but you don't get anything for being up voted do you? So it doesnt make sense to control them, you know like buddies just up voting buddies? Maybe I don't understand, but it is frustrating. I seem to always run out of up votes and I'm not trying to up vote one person.

You're right, no real reason for that limit. We put the limit in place back when the system put more of an emphasis on user reputation instead of post reputation. I'll bump it up.

[2015-2016 NHL Season]

Oshie gets his first goal as a Cap.

 

[You Can't Make This Up]

Don't bother reasoning with the village idiot.

Stop getting personal guys, thanks.