The Sicatoka

I believe the young lady has the same co-morbidity concern that many express about the President. She may have it moreso than the President*. *Disclaimer: I ain't one to pick and toss that particular rock.

I had not seen the photo in your link. If the photo is legitimate and they're flying those flags as a protest or rebellion icon, they're no friend of mine.

Different States can't have different standards or laws?

This is the leader of Michigan marauders (click on photo to enlarge) who planned ill for the governor there. It's the same fellow I posted before, but now you get a clearer view of his wall decor. Help me out, that's not a swastika, not a Confederate battle flag, but the symbol used by anarchists, no?

Seems the NYP is unimpressed with Speaker Pelosi's latest tact. https://nypost.com/2020/10/08/nancy-pelosis-latest-coup-coup-nonsense/

Or Pelosi is calling the goalie over to the bench.

Why is Speaker Pelosi talking about Amendment 25 (again) tomorrow? Shouldn’t she be planning Mr Biden’s victory party? Someone sure they are winning wouldn’t be thinking about how to remove a President... or should Mr Biden be nervous.

It’s the law of the land at this time. I don’t have like or agree with it.

Those Michigan "kidnappers"? Anachists (note flag in background) and anti-Trump. Don't believe me. In their own words ...

The USA Today headline and "fact check" is misleading. In the story is "the money quote". " ... did not involve human stem cells ... "

I’d say you need to read the following from USA Today: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/10/08/fact-check-trumps-antibody-therapy-not-made-fetal-stem-cells/5901542002/

As a moderator who can see email and IP addresses, I can neither confirm nor deny.

My question last night the moderators didn't use: Sen. Harris, do you continue your views of the Knights of Columbus as you did during a Senate hearing as a "religious test" and in direct conflict to Article VI, and did you gain that view of Catholicism from your fellow Californian Sen. Feinstein and her questioning of Amy Coney Barrett during the 2017 hearings to appoint Judge Barrett to the Seventh Circuit. I remind you your running-mate, former Vice President Biden, considers himself a Catholic before you answer, as does House Speaker Pelosi.

You have to ... vote Biden President so that you can find out what is in him, away from the fog of the controversy. Gold star and smile face if you get the reference.

My guesses: Jacob Markstrom --> to MIN Anton Khudobin --> stays in DAL Thomas Greiss --> to CGY Corey Crawford --> to DET Henrik Lundqvis --> to WAS Braden Holtby --> to VAN Marc-Andre Fleury --> back to PIT Matt Murray <-- already with OTT Darcy Kuemper --> stay in ARI Tuukka Rask --> stay in BOS

Facts not in evidence. We could bet they don't like brunette, right-handed, female Michigan State graduates born in Lansing.

From the Associated Press: https://apnews.com/article/michigan-checks-and-balances-archive-gretchen-whitmer-da09ca66cd8d5f36722021d3593425ff

When posed with the direct question in the debate, Mr. Biden would not answer his position on "stacking the Supreme Court". I find the lack of a direct answer to a direct question somewhere between disturbing and disqualifying. Your turn.

The story in the NHL right now is Vegas is offering to give you Fleury and a 2nd round pick and Vegas retains half the contract! Fleury for two years at $3.5M AAV ... and nobody is taking because they know Vegas is horribly over the cap already. The league is letting VGK stew in their juices. Welcome to Flat Cap hardball.

So the Big Sky becomes the northwest US FCS conference and the WAC becomes the southwest US FCS conference? (The MVFC in the US northern plains FCS conference I guess.)

Allow me to restate: Then YOU explain it to us. (I thought personal pronoun was implied; I guess I have to be explicit.) That does not mean a link to an opinion article. That explanation also need not include pejoratives (general or directed). Please, you explain it to us.

Then explain it to us.

From the link UNDBIZ supplied: Of those three paragraphs, the last one is what I've been suspicious that we're being set up for --> limited access to reduced healthcare services. Call it first setting reduced expectations. Call it a first step to a system worse. And sure, call me paranoid.

2016 (so 14-ish).