cold Posted March 1, 2007 Posted March 1, 2007 That could be. Or it could be that the coachs from the East split votes between either Wurden and Miller or Wurden and Everson. And all the West coachs voted for Herbel. That is the only way I can believe Herbel won, even if Wurden is a "C" student. Being considered a "c" student would be a bit generous for Wurden.
knownothing Posted March 1, 2007 Posted March 1, 2007 I have two questions. How did Pat Arnason not make all-state and how come Danny Wurden did not win Mr. Hockey. These two questions I cannot answer myself and hopefully someone else can give me their perspective on this.
knownothing Posted March 1, 2007 Posted March 1, 2007 I have to believe Arnason did not make it because of sentimental vote for Deichert. Arnason played much better all season than Deichert, especially at state. Deichert let in 2 soft goals and was probably the difference in the championship game. Also, how did the Seaburg kid from Bismarck make it??? Also, 8 forwards and 7 defensemen? Strange?
extremerouge Posted March 1, 2007 Posted March 1, 2007 I have to believe Arnason did not make it because of sentimental vote for Deichert. Arnason played much better all season than Deichert, especially at state. Deichert let in 2 soft goals and was probably the difference in the championship game. Also, how did the Seaburg kid from Bismarck make it??? Also, 8 forwards and 7 defensemen? Strange? everyone knows that the all-state team is laughable. stop trying to figure out why some kids made it while others didn't. it's useless.
Stiouxy Posted March 6, 2007 Posted March 6, 2007 everyone knows that the all-state team is laughable. stop trying to figure out why some kids made it while others didn't. it's useless. Laughable would be an understatement
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now