cberkas

4-2 Rangers

I'll have to find it again, the B1G schools, Notre Dame, and Denver are all over $1 million and some are over $2 million. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-05-23/notre-dame-brings-lacrosse-s-lowest-revenue-into-ncaa-semifinals http://diycollegerankings.com/much-colleges-spend-d1-mens-lacrosse-programs-2/7471/

4-1 Rangers Chokeitals is right.

3-1 Rangers

The big thing with adding lacrosse is the cost, and all the western schools are in the $1 million a year and more to play D1 Lacrosse. It would help if UND had a lacrosse club team (I couldn't find UND on the MCLA website). If UND added lacrosse, a western conference could be created and other schools would need to buy in also that have club level teams. Denver and Air Force most likely would like less travel and get Colorado College to move up to Division 1. Then you have 7 schools in the Big Sky and 4 NCHC schools have club lacrosse teams and toss in NDSU, SDSU, and USD's club teams and that would be a nice size conference. Frist it's going to take money and getting other area schools to add lacrosse as a varsity sport on both men's and women's for it to work. Colorado State adding women's lacrosse and joining the 5 Pac-12 teams would give the Pac-12 an auto-bid.

2-1 Rangers

Lacrosse is going to cost $1 million to 2 million at UND with it most likely being a loss in revenue.

Switzerland not Sweden.

Montreal 2-1

Tampa Bay ties it 1-1

4-2 Ducks

The refs in the Calgary game are god awful.

3-2 Ducks

Ducks tie it 2-2

Rangers live to fight another day, 2-1 overtime.

Stephen Jones is the one who makes player/personal decisions for the Cowboys and has already said if they trade for Peterson his contract will be reworked for $8 million. Peterson's agent knows he will get the most money from the Vikings.

Calgary 2-1

Calgary ties it 1-1

Rangers tie it 1-1

1-0 Capitals What a goal.

Washington came close, but no goal.

Season

Rozsival fractured ankle.

He accelerated and was suppose to come to Notre Dame in 2015/16.

After the ACHA coaches meetings the "overwhelming majority coaches wanted to keep the NCAA Regionals as is". The NCAA committee will meet in June to talk about the potential change to the Regionals. http://www.uscho.com/2015/05/07/overwhelming-majority-of-coaches-dont-want-change-for-ncaa-regional-system/ Some other points in the article. - Don't expect any changes to the NCAA selection process. - Adding practices at the beginning of the year. - Expanding the coaching staffs from three full-time paid coaches to four. - Not a rule change year, but tweaking goaltender interference was brought up. Coaches feel that goalies are over protected and goals that should count are being waved off. When it comes to the NCAA Regionals, if an arena can't have a combined attendance of the first two game of 10,000 or at least close to 10,000 and a two day total around 15,000. Then those arenas shouldn't be allowed to host a NCAA Regional again. It should be easy for the committee to be able to keep a list of Regionals that worked and ones that failed. looking at this year Fargo and Providence were successful and Notre Dame and Manchester didn't work. Another thing that should be implemented is who can be a "host school" for the NCAA tournament. For a school to host an NCAA Regional they would have to had been in the NCAA tournament in the last 5 to 10 years. So schools like Brown this year shouldn't be allowed to host a NCAA Regional.