scpa0305

I wouldn't bet the farm on 8-10 years....but I also believe he makes it to the Show, as previosly mentioned. He's 6'2 225+ with decent hands and a hard shot.....that's pretty much an NHL 3rd/4th liner.

Yeah I agree, Budish is a very good player. I bet he sees some NHL time with how big he is, not top 6 but he'll be a decent 3rd or 4th liner.

Me too.

We just had a Hobey not too long ago. Frattin could have gotten one but I really don't think one other player since Duncan should have received it.

Scram.

We got both of these games this weekend!

Dead serious. He was the most dominant player in the ice. As soon as they get knocked out of the NCAAs he will join FLA's top 6/9, he will also never play an AHL game, unless FLA is out of it this year by the time the gophs season is over. He will get a rookie max contract as well. Remember all this...if I'm wrong u can let me know come March....u seem to be the expert.

All at home....their schedule is cake.

1. I'm not sure Gothberg played his best game.....but I do see him as a better option than Saunders. I felt the Gophers played much better on Saturday than Friday, they simply didn't get as lucky (or should I say UND didn't get as unlucky). 2. I felt Rowney played a lot better this past weekend, however, he has still been pretty non-existent all season. We need him to hit the stat sheet. 3. I don't even have he energy to respond to this one...you are correct though. That Saturday game still has me so upset. All you people were mad at the Friday effort but I felt they played ok, they simply got so unlucky. The Saturday game was so much worse. They played so good for 50 minutes then had a full blown melt down. Our defense is SO overrated. Everyone of our dman played terrible except Simpson. Forbert needs to figure it out. I almost wanted to jump out there for him. 4. Not sure about this.....they barely gave up any odd man rushes. (Although the Goofs seemed to capitalized on everyone). 5. Yes, he is by far and away the best college hockey player in the country....now one can argue that. He is an NHL player playing college hockey. But he can be contained (ex. Saturday night). You can't stop him but you can contain him. FYI, their defense was awesome...I lost count on their blocked shots early each game.

Point blank shot.

He gave up a rebound??? It was a point blank shot. Where was the d in front?

Forbort is borderline useless

No he doesn't, there is no fighting.

No he doesn't, there is no fighting.

Rau is going to be in trouble when he gets to the AHL....or he's going to have to quit yapping.

Our defense is terrible!!!

I agree, no idea what hak is seeing in Mitch, he wasn't even a role player for scsu. I really am shocked they are starting gothberg in such an important game. Also, no idea why pattyn is on any line but the 4th (I do like him in the lineup however). We got this one tonight!

Haha your delusional....that made me laugh, good one.

Again, I thought und got extremely unlucky last night, take away the broken stick and eng and its a 3-1 game. Then factor in that the goofs capitalized on a percentage of their chances and we capitalized on zero (I'm not counting the fluke deflection that popped in). Also their goalie played outstanding and ours simply played decent. For everyone saying we didn't play physical....that is how we were forced to play, other we would be in the box the whole game, shepherd was refing people. If we cut down on our turnovers I think we would have won last night. Some takeaways...bjugstad is a man child and should be playing in the show right now, he's something we're simply going to have to contain, we can't stop him. He was by far the best player on the ice last night. Also, I am a huge gothberg fan, but this is not the environment you throw him into tonight, Clarke was not bad last night. Hak has already messed up by not letting gothberg play more during the season, maybe next weekend he gets the nod. I am also not sure about Mitch Macmillan, I think he is a role player at best, we'll see though.

I disagree completely....we looked decent, we had a few bad turnovers, and a lot of bad luck.

Rocco has to play with players that are at his skill level.

Way better than dell was.

All things considered, we aren't playing that bad....however these turnovers are going to cost us.

Pretty non-commital.....is that a split...or a MN sweep?!?

You're a mess!