Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

scpa0305

Members
  • Posts

    10,594
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10

Profile Information

  • Interests
    Men's hockey

Recent Profile Visitors

8,126 profile views

scpa0305's Achievements

Grand Master

Grand Master (14/14)

  • Reacting Well
  • Conversation Starter Rare
  • Very Popular Rare
  • Dedicated
  • First Post

Recent Badges

  1. That’s aggressive.
  2. Well then flip them. If my kid is committed to Michigan and they then add a few CHL studs…you better hope my ears are perked as far as other opportunities. At this point, the gentleman’s agreement from years past is out the door.
  3. It was just an example. I used Michigan because they pulled a top flight blue chip this morning and by the sounds of it, they’re not done. Does that mean they’ll win a natty? No. I’m sure other schools were in on the transfers you referred to. UND is a great spot to keep developing and those players know that. They were also told what their role would be, which I’m assuming was driving their decision. Were they high end prospects? No, not at all. But they’ve all worked themselves into being wanted come portal times. Which is exciting if you’re a UND fan. I’d honestly rather bring these guys in than 6-7 rd 18-19 year olds out of juniors.
  4. We shall see.
  5. Well….they can’t go to a loaded blue chip Michigan roster can they? They need to play. Not saying Michigan is going to be awesome next year, my reference was only an example. My point was you need to play.
  6. And they’ll come in more experienced/ready than say a 4-5 rd draft pick that’s only played juniors. I’m fine with it to help win games.
  7. High end prospects vs portal transfers are two completely different things. Were any of the transfers even drafted?
  8. I would agree here. But the Big10 seem to be pulling way ahead (we’ll see how far)….we’re going to have to go older.
  9. The advisors want their blue chip players to play with/against other blue chips.
  10. That answer was like 99% correct.
  11. 90-95%….im a homer too….but boy, you’re a little out of touch with this one. And I’m saying that as nicely as a can
  12. He’s ranked as a 1st rounder…but I’m kind of confused how this kid isn’t a top 5-10 projected pick. His numbers are super good. His D might be a work in progress I suppose.
  13. Selfishly, I want one of those.
  14. Similar to how ushl players translate. Some will struggle others will do well…the blue chips will/should do well.
  15. Boy that is a nice get.
×
×
  • Create New...