Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

wilson

Members
  • Posts

    22
  • Joined

  • Last visited

wilson's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  1. That is quite possibly the most ludicrous thing I have ever read. There is no way that is true, no way.
  2. Wait, are those the new FB unis in there??? That logo on the shoulder/arm looks really bad. It's gonna be all stretched out there. The only good thing I see from going back to Gemini, is that the numbers are a lot better looking. UND need to drop the double outlined names on the back, it's way too small to pull off well. Just go with black or green names.
  3. wilson

    Old Logo

    I have a large one in a wallpaper format. I'll have to edit it up some to make it more of a logo. I'll have to work on it later though. What is this gonna be used for, may I ask?
  4. Gonna revise this and say I will consider Saturday as well. Also, I have never looked to buy tickets the day of the game before, if it boils down to that, what it the "scalper scene" like, do I have a chance of finding some that way?
  5. Lower bowl preferenced, but beggers can't be choosers I suppose.
  6. I can almost guarantee that if they move to a Big Ten conference and we still have the Sioux nickname, they will pull the "Now that we are in different conferences and have no obligation to play them, (excpet playoffs) we will refuse to play UND based on the controversey of the nickname" bullcrap.
  7. I don't see a problem with 11, works for the Big Ten I guess. If you need 12, then UNO would be great, followed by NMU. That's about all that would work, since AF doesn't want in.
  8. It's not necessarily keeping athletics seperate from athletics, just having a school logo and sport logo different. If the University is sending out official documents for important educational stuff to say other parts of the world, would they want the Sioux head on there? No. On the flip side, if you combine the two identities and the logo comes out professional on paper, but weak on a jersey, would that look good on the field? No.
  9. Our UND was the first to use it, true. It sucks that it's not seen as "our" logo across the nation. You will notice this year though, that they actually changed it by putting "SIOUX" down the N. It looks quite stupid that way. Also, the flame logo should be institutional only, you gotta have seperate identities. Plus it is not strong enough as a sports logo.
  10. Pretty much all Toronto fans I know can't stand him, sadly. Maybe it will be good for him to go elsewhere.
  11. We need to ditch the all black pants, it looks too forced, and too much of a 90's gotta add black feel. The helmet is great, but, sadly everyone thinks its a Notre Dame rip-off. Not sure what else you could put on there. They DEFINITELY need to put NORTH DAKOTA across the chest, need to get the name recogniztion out there.
  12. From the sound of it, SCSU were just not ready to play today. Or they were scared. There was just no fire there.
×
×
  • Create New...