I don't buy the argument that the NCAA has more important things to worry about than athletic teams using American Indian nicknames, logos, mascots, etc. Every governing body that's ever existed has dealt with smaller issues while pondering and studying larger ones. It's human nature to handle small issues to create the perception that things are getting done while more difficult issues linger.
My problem with the NCAA in terms of the American Indian nickname policy isn't that the organization took action to "solve" the problem, but that it chose to ignore its own constitution and bylaws to leapfrog this issue over all others.
There was obviously little or no thought put into determining how this policy would be enforced on member institutions that chose not to comply with it. Myles Brand and the executive committee simply assumed that when the 800-pound gorilla spoke, everyone would get in line to grovel before it. And with the exception of UND, Brand and his like-minded buddies were correct. So now the NCAA finds itself in the position of having to enforce a policy that doesn't exist in the rulebooks that govern its championship events because the organization's members have not voted on or passed such rules in accordance with the NCAA constitution and bylaws.
I do think it's reasonable to ask the NCAA this question: If hostility and abuse at college athletic events are such despicable behaviors that they must be stamped out by extraordinary means, and if creating an atmosphere of respect for all is so vitally important that NCAA members can't be trusted to find a resolution themselves, why is this behavior allowed to continue in much broader and more pervasive forms? Is it not the height of hypocrisy and discrimination for the NCAA to claim that one race of people deserves special shielding from allegedly hostile and abusive treatment while everyone else must tolerate and endure behavior that is, without question, hostile and abusive?
Two recent articles contrast and compare the borader problem of hostility and abuse in college athletics that the NCAA appears to have little interest in tackling.
From the San Antonio Express-News:
Rubs Me Raw: "The Brawl" proves that the NCAA is weak
From the Columbus Dispatch:
SPOILSPORTS
Alcohol and late games don