Walsh Hall
-
Posts
709 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Posts posted by Walsh Hall
-
-
7 minutes ago, Hayduke1 said:
Who, pray tell, do you believe are "normal people"? Seems like more coded language.
This ought to be interesting...
The "normal" people are the 80-90% of people that think that Trump is a complete buffoon, that Biden is losing his marbles, and that the fringe on the left and right are outright dangerous. Unfortunately to get the (D) nomination they needed to move so far left it's nuts. The political consensus is that the absolute best thing Biden can do is hide and say absolutely nothing. That's pretty telling about the status of the candidates.
Just as with Hillary, it shows how awful the (D) candidate is that the 2016 and 2020 elections are/were even in doubt.
Any moderate and coherent candidate would be fantastic, too bad their isn't one.
-
1 hour ago, dlsiouxfan said:
Please spare me your sanctimony.
Just in the last two weeks, Trump has falsely accused a media correspondent who was critical of him of murdering a woman and falsely accused a 75 year old man of being a member of Antifa and using his cell phone to jam police equipment. In the case of the 75 year old, the man is currently recovering from a nearly fatal head injury and is now experiencing significant harassment and death threats because the President of the United States used his considerable platform to slander the man.
Let's not forget that Trump's rise in political prominence began with him slandering the previous president with the racist smear that he wasn't a U.S. citizen despite all evidence to the contrary.
If you voted for him then you're obviously OK with all of this and you certainly don't find dishonesty despicable.
You have no concept of nuance do you? Because someone voted for Trump in no way means they are okay with all of Trumps actions. I do find dishonesty despicable, including yours.
-
1
-
-
I'll be interested to see the power rankings implications and how this will be incorporated. I've always thought getting no "credit" for a 5x5 OT loss was a bit unfair.
-
Just saw a clip of a "defund the police" person on CNN. She was asked about someone calling the police for a break-in at night. Her response was nothing but the question showed the hosts' privilege. No substantive answer.
Would Minneapolis actually defund the PD? What an absolute mess that would be, although it would be an interesting social experiment to witness from afar."
-
Their failure has nothing to do with Covid. The relationship between the players and owners has always been horrible.
Tough break for the Twins. Their window isn’t gonna be too big and they had a pretty solid team this year.
-
6 minutes ago, Oxbow6 said:
FPD just declared the protesting in downtown Fargo an unlawful assembly. Getting a little on the edge there.
Scare situation. Just takes one stupid move by a protester or officer. After 8 hours of “protesting” its time to go home. Nerves have to be getting to a breaking point.
-
1 hour ago, keikla said:
Will you please share the source for those numbers?
Was on CNBC yesterday in regard to the unemployment claims and the difficulty businesses are having in hiring folks because they are receiving way more by not working. There is a proposal to pay those that go back to work $450/week on top of their wage to help make up the difference between their working wage and the unemployment they are receiving.
-
An inmate released early due to Covid murdered someone in Minot.
70% of unemployed are receiving more than their employment wages, 20% are receiving more than 2 times their employment income.
Good times.
-
39 minutes ago, dynato said:
Troll. ND evictions are processed as normal now, true, but that is not what we are talking about so don't construe the conversation to imply such. I understand the legal process. I have posted seven official sources that show legal circumstances are now different and that you are wrong about your assumptions for the currently existing nationwide eviction bans. Corroborated by POTUS Trump, Fox News, and legal references. You have provided nothing but "trust my word on this", if you had any proof eviction ban states are evicting for economic hardship cases, you'd be able to share it by now.
Minnesota
Oregon
Colorado
Florida
You are utterly clueless on this subject because you are completely clueless on the legal procedures involved (which is probably a good thing). FILING and SERVING and two completely separate acts. Under the bans you can’t FILE or actually evict someone. That is TOTALLY different than SERVING someone, which still continued under the bans.
-
1 hour ago, dynato said:
Now you are just trolling. Trump banned evictions on a federal level for the pandemic and 31 states extended his order. I posted sources that clearly highlight this also showing no sheriffs show up to serve you if you reside in a state with an existing ban. No officers show up to remove a tenant = no eviction = no officer entering the residence of a cop killer = no officer death. You are going out of your way to call this all factually incorrect and yet cowardly refuse provide any evidence to prove yourself right.
Go to the courthouse and ask a judge (or ask one that posts here). I‘m sorry you don’t understand the legal system and the legal steps in an eviction, but you are unequivocally wrong in your statement.
There is a difference between serving and filing a legal action. Just because something is served doesn’t mean the court system is involved in anything yet. Sheriffs don’t show up to remove a tenant until after they are served a 3 day, after they are served a complaint, after the eviction hearing is done in which tenant is provided time to move, and after a writ of execution is issued days later directing the sheriff to remove a tenant (which rarely happens).
-
40 minutes ago, dynato said:
I never said eviction paperwork would not be started nor did I say they will never get evicted once the ban ends. I''m speaking directly on evictions and the eviction ban.
"Eviction" is the act of physically removing a tenant from the property. That act of filing to removing tenants was banned across all 50 states by Trump, now it is only banned across 31 states. Meaning evictions have not actually taken place due to financial hardship from pandemic. I gave you several references that evictions are still banned. I gave you additional references of papers not being allowed to be filed nor served, as well as reference to where landlords who have decided to bypass federal/state law to evict have faced legal consequences resulting in a null in their eviction process. You even acknowledge the truth in this and yet sadly contradict yourself and claim Trump, Fox, State Supreme courts, and me to be 100% wrong about evictions taking place without any evidence to support yourself.
You stated if evictions were banned he wouldn’t have been killed. You are 100% wrong. He would have still been served, which is when the event happened. Your statement was 100% wrong.
-
1
-
-
You are just 100% wrong on this one Dynato. The (3) days were always served, there were just no eviction hearings being held so no one was being evicted. The folks couldn’t be formally evicted until the hearings were allowed. You are correct than no evictions were/are issued, but the process never stopped, it was delayed.
The other documents were still being done and served to hopefully have the Tenants move voluntarily and to be ready to move the eviction when the prohibition is/was lifted.
-
1
-
-
16 minutes ago, dynato said:
Sure, if ND implemented a ban on evictions like a dozen other states have, the officer absolutely would not have died this week. If ND didn't shut down in the first place, the officer also may not have died.
This is 100% factually incorrect. Eviction in those situations/states were still being served (3 day notices, Eviction Summons/Complaints) the hearing were just being put on hold. Landlords still issued the (3) days and Complaints to hopefully have the tenants voluntarily vacate the premises.
-
20 minutes ago, Redneksioux said:
How’d you come up with 99.7 because the death rate from the LM infection was worse?
And how many more vulnerable were infected and have passed because of those avoidable outbreaks?
Add up the number of deaths and divide by the number of cases. Nearly 900 confirmed Smithfield, 2 Dead. Similar percentage for Tyson.
Second question, statistically speaking, probably a dozen or so folks in the 80+ demo with serious preexisting conditions.
-
2 hours ago, Redneksioux said:
Was LM wind providing safe conditions? Smithfield? How about Tyson?
If a survival rate of over 99.7% for infected workers in your worst case scenario isn’t good enough I don’t know why you’d ever venture out of your mom’s basement.
-
4
-
-
41 minutes ago, Redneksioux said:
Would you consider your right to be out without a mask a civil liberty? Your right to socialize in a bar? How about your right to operate a business with a high number of employees in unsafe conditions? Even if all of the above are liberties, considering the situation shouldn’t we just do the right thing? Those patriots you mention gave up their liberties so we could have them. Why do we have the me first attitude now?
You apparently have a warped understanding of the word “unsafe.”
Because your sense of, “the right thing” is completely lacking in factual support it’s impossibly to take you seriously.
You are full of conclusions, but completely lacking in facts supporting the conclusion. They are kinda the important part.
-
19 minutes ago, Redneksioux said:
Maybe because we are failing at protecting them? No $hit it’s not working, so what do you suggest is done about it?
There is no great answer to this question, and certainly not an answer which will appease folks with your mindset. The human condition always wins. Some of us are vulnerable, some are not. Killing countless others as a byproduct of this mess. and killing the economy in a feeble attempt to save some folks that unfortunately can't be saved makes zero sense. We are taking all reasonable steps to protect the vulnerable. We were dealt a bad hand, we still need to play it.
Tack on another covid death. An acquaintance took his own life last week as an absolutely result of this mess. Small business owner who employed several family members. All went to crap, but nobody cares about that...
-
Per CNBC this morning, cancer diagnosis's have decreased 30% in the past months. At least fewer people are getting cancer for some reason because of all this... If we shut down the country for another couple months maybe we can eliminate cancer.
As for retail, the prevailing thought is that many folks will continue to use amazon, walmart.com, target.com, etc for online shopping. All (3) have seen very large increases in business. Presumably many folks will continue to utilize these services now that they are getting accustomed to it. That is bad news for smaller retail and brick/mortar retail chains without a solid online business.
-
12 minutes ago, Redneksioux said:
Got ya beat I just witnessed an an elderly male screaming at a nurse at altru saying he is entering without wearing a mask.
He shouldn't be screaming at anyone, but if an elderly gentleman wants to knowingly assume a potential risk, more power to him. (Acknowledging that if a private business requires the wearing of a mask, that is their business decision and it should be honored if someone wants to patronize the establishment).
-
1 hour ago, Redneksioux said:
Would you prefer we go back to your other favorite topic of “no scientific benefit of mask use”?
Article with counterpoint regarding masks, including scientific research indicating that masks have not should benefit in regard to the flu.
-
7 minutes ago, Redneksioux said:
I don’t know how deaths were reported then either but to say that covid deaths are being counted differently from flu deaths is another misnomer, yet this misinformation continues to be spread to push an agenda.
Do you dispute that deaths are being counts as Covid, without a test, so long as there are any Covid symptoms, or even suspecting there were symptoms. (Elderly person found deceased at home are counted). That is not the case with the flu.
Of the deaths reported in ND, how many do you think we’re proximate our caused by Covid?
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, Oxbow6 said:
Sounds great. I'll put dlsiouxfan in charge of garbage collection/disposal......and entertainment. He'll be performing his famous General Patton impersonation.
I'll put you in change of tending to the Jiffy Jon because one POS knows another. You'll need to wipe the door handle down after everyone licks it as well.
Oh wait...... you're not available to work my party tonight. You're still washing yzerman's fleet of cars.
Put Old Fella in charge of masks. He seems to know his stuff.
-
12 minutes ago, Redneksioux said:
Our population is 66% greater than 1968.
But covid19 is on currently on pace to be 500% more deadly than the Hong Kong flu was to US residents.
The writer might as well have been comparing osteosarcoma to rhinovirus.
How were the deaths computed for both? Apples at apples? Based on how the deaths are reported for Covid the numbers are clearly overstated. Whether it was the same for the HHF I don’t know, but it certainly was much harder on young folks.
https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/health/lessons-to-be-learned-from-1957-pandemic/
For your 500% greater total, I’ll take the under. For the unemployment numbers next week, I’ll continue to cash on the over.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, dynato said:
I have screens on all my windows. It helps keep out most bugs, however some bugs can still make it into the house. Other people can choose not to have screens on their windows. They will just have more bugs getting into their homes when they have their windows open.
To stay with the trend of horrible analogies... the U.S. had a Frazee in goal. A Frazee helps keep out most pucks, however some pucks can still make it into the goal. Other people can choose not to have a Frazee in the goal. Frazee is a sieve and everything shot by a Toews goes right through him into the goal. Having a Frazee in the goal really makes no difference when facing a Toews.
-
3
-
2020 Dumpster Fire (Enter at your own risk)
in Community
Posted
In ND for the CONFIRMED cases for people under 60 - 99.82% survival rate.
In ND for the CONFIRMED cases for people under 70 - 99.6% survival rate.
In ND, given those numbers for the CONFIRMED cases, the fatality rate is probably less than 1 per 1000 in those under 70.
health.nd.gov