Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

iramurphy

Members
  • Posts

    3,669
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    124

Posts posted by iramurphy

  1. 53 minutes ago, UND-FB-FAN said:

    Chaves historically hires D2 head coach, going back to Beau Baldwin at EWU and most recently Paul Sather at UND. 
    I’d guess it will be a Midwest D2 coach or the lazy (and risky) move of Fruechte being promoted. 

    Hoffner beat Bolte today, maybe Hoffner?

    From the very beginning (see my earlier posts), Schmidt has been the favorite. Too much fraternity support and now fundraising. It’s basically a hiring similar to Bubba - UND ties and is familiar to alumni. Justification used is it is “DeBoer’s guy” , although he’s not working for him anymore and cut ties … UND going with Schmidt could work, but could be mediocrity like with Bubba. We will see. 

    Schmidt hasn’t cut ties to DeBoer. They still communicate and DeBoer said he is welcome to join him in Alabama. 
    If FB Alumni were organized and “now fundraising “ I would know. That isn’t to say there aren’t FB alumni pushing for him to get the job, but probably just as many pushing for Tibesar. 

     

  2. 9 minutes ago, Shawn-O said:

    Good call out but was making >$800k at last gig in Indiana 

    He gets $815,000 from Indiana through the end of 2025. Those buyouts usually are reduced by any amount the guy gets with a new job.  I don’t think he would come to FCS program, but there have been  rumors, and it would give him a chance to get back into coaching with a HC position. His Temple job and Indiana OC jobs didn’t work out. He could use a “reboot”.  
     

  3. Isn’t Wisconsin struggling this year?  How did #1 Michigan State do against them last night?  
    I haven’t read anything from fans that the coaching staff hasn’t noticed, been discussing with team captains, and trying to solve. At some point in time, changes are made cuz nothing is working. We aren’t there yet. 
     

    For those “in the know”, how did we lose the Slukynsky brothers to Western Michigan?  Losing guys like that is a bigger red flag in my mind than struggling against Miami, Bemidji, Bob Morris before Christmas. Did we recruit them? Did we offer them. I’m no expert but they were 2 of the best HS prospects I have seen in a long time. 
    I know we will lose guys to Duluth cuz of location and they have been good, and to Denver, and the other perennial powers.  Does anyone know the story on these guys?

    • Upvote 1
  4. 3 minutes ago, UND-FB-FAN said:

    Experience doesn’t always equate to success. Some young individuals are really successful and some older guys never quite get the job done, etc., etc., etc.

    I agree that experience is nice, but I think a history of success is most important. Winners win. It’s an intrinsic quality for some, although some can learn it, sure. In the case of Schmidt and Luke S., they likely have learned new things and made new connections, but why haven’t they shown more success? Same goes for Freund with UND (2011-2023) and Freuchte (2024). 

    Based on getting someone who purely knows winning football, that also coincidentally happens to mean getting someone not recently (or ever) associated with UND football in the past. 

    Simple answer: It’s complicated. I don’t believe it’s a good idea to ignore potential candidates cuz of UND ties nor because they are older or younger than 40.  I’m not on the selection committee so my opinion is no more important than anyone else’s posting here. I  might opine if I knew who applied but its irrelevant  

     

     

     

    • Upvote 1
  5. 12 minutes ago, UND-FB-FAN said:

    I realize simply looking away from those with UND ties has been frowned upon on here, but the more I think about it, I want someone hired with no ties. The past 15 years has overall been rough for UND considering what NDSU and SDSU has accomplished.

     

    A winner with no ties to UND is preferred. Need new ideas, new philosophies, new blood.
     

    That means no to Schmidt, Freund, and even Fruechte. I like Luke Schleusner but really that would count him out also. 

    New ideas, and new philosophies evolve over time so I don’t believe Fruechte has been overly influenced by one year here. Along that line Schmidt and Schluesner have been  gone long enough with other programs such that their ideas, philosophy and style has been evolving while gone. 

    The best coaches can flat out recruit and can coach. That is what we need regardless of UND connections. More importantly, is D1 experience, HC experience, and evidence of successes as their careers evolve. 

    • Upvote 4
  6. 2 hours ago, UND-FB-FAN said:

    Same argument as Fruechte. If he was the answer, why wasn’t UND winning playoff games and championships with him and Bubba from 2014-2023?  
     

    No thanks, need new ideas and a new philosophy, and these guys from the Bubba coaching tree (Eric Schmidt, Danny Freund, even to a degree Isaac Fruechte) don’t offer that. 

    I’m not advocating for anyone in particular but I’m not so sure we can assume these guys would continue the status quo. 
    All 3 have coached at different places but over the years have spent time at coaches clinics or even spent time with other programs during the off season. 
    They also have experienced what doesn’t work and could very well have different ideas about moving the program forward. If any of them are interviewed, that would need to be clearly evident. 

    • Upvote 1
  7. There will be no requirement for candidates to have present or prior UND coaching/playing experience. 
    There won’t be set minimum/maximum age limits but younger guys will need to have built an impressive resume in a shorter period. Although there won’t be a set maximum age we don’t want guys who don’t have the energy, don’t have the passion and can’t relate to players and their families. 
    No reason to limit our chances due to preconceived prejudices.  

    • Upvote 2
  8. 31 minutes ago, SIOUXFAN97 said:

    are we doing this correct?  normally doesn't the new HC bring in who he wants?  are we "telling" our new HC that fruchte is so golden that he's your OC?  what if the HC we bring in has successful bc HIS oc uses the tight end and play action and whatnot and now your telling your new HC  ....nawh leave your bro behind and learn to love isacc.....

     

    HC chooses his own staff. Present staff knows it. HC may keep some of present staff.  Depends on who and how many he brings with him. Keeping guys who can recruit and who are liked and respected by players can help with transition and recruiting. 

    • Upvote 4
  9. 7 minutes ago, Siouxperfan7 said:

    "Minimum 8 seasons of full-time collegiate coaching experience"

    This rules out Fruechte.  He's only at 7.

    Not sure why they would pick 8 years,  but experience would be a key factor. 

  10. 14 minutes ago, UNDhoops said:

    i know they'll never do this but i think they should hire someone who runs the option. we're never going to out recruit ndsu and sdsu so we need to do something different.

    If we hire a coach who doesn’t think we can “out recruit” the other top FCS programs then we probably won’t. We recently have started to win some of those battles. 
    The coach who we hire better be able to coach FB.  He needs to b flexible enough to adjust schemes that will put his personnel in a position to succeed. 3-4, 4-3, even 3-3-5 when needed and whatever combo of offensive schemes that fit his personnel. 

    • Upvote 4
  11. 1 hour ago, UND-FB-FAN said:

    The “next DeBoer” would have not gone 5-7 this season or been apart of a 5-6 (record) division II program. 

    When you say the next head coach needs to be the best person for the job, that is incredibly ambiguous and unclear. 

    When you say fortunately no one with that philosophy will be making that decision, then that is both an unjustified and uninformed jab at me but also failed insight on your part into the track record of UND’s recent hires. 

    Since you may actually have UND’s attention with all of this, I would just say getting the best person is getting the person who best can a) recruit, b) retain, c) develop and d) coach student-athletes in real-time (need to be a good in-game head coach), and thus produce the most competitive teams possible for UND football, hopefully championship caliber, while also e) fostering positive growth and mentorship.
     

    In my opinion, someone who has been a successful head coach previously should be held in high regard, but certainly interviewing a good coordinator and selecting one who projects to be a good recruiter, developer, and in-game strategist is appropriate, we just DON’T want UND leadership to settle for someone who has UND ties only because they have UND ties. I would like to think you can at least appreciate that perspective and the possibility of it (based on the past), @iramurphy. Hopefully the leadership sees through that potential distraction. 

    You are correct. I have stated more than once that we aren’t looking for someone with UND ties, we are looking for the best candidate to turn this program around. UND ties not required but not a disqualifying factor either. 
    I have previously stated what I think we should be looking for in a head coach and we have listed similar qualities. Where we seem to differ is that I don’t care whether or not they have “UND ties”.  

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 2
  12. 1 hour ago, UND-FB-FAN said:

    The entire staff should take responsibility for the 2024 implosion and 5-game losing streak (that includes the popular interim head coach and recent OC Isaac Fruechte). Next head coach should be and needs to be someone external and without previous UND ties, but I’m feeling unsure that will be the case, unfortunately.

    Then we could miss the next “DeBoer”.  The next head coach needs to be the best person for the job regardless of what schools he has played or coached at. 
     

    Fortunately, no one with that philosophy will be making the decision. 

    • Upvote 1
  13. 4 hours ago, MinnDak said:

    How was the offense against the good teams? How did the spunky experiment work out? There is 5 coaches that stood by each other this season and didn’t do one thing or call out one thing during 7 game implosion. None of those 4 should even be a consideration. 

    I’m not sure how you know that none of those coaches “didn’t do one thing or call  out one thing”.  

    Those are discussions, that can get pretty heated sometimes, occur in staff meetings.   Players get those messages in the film room all of the time. They also get those messages in group meetings with position coaches or private meetings with one of the coaches. 
     

    I don’t know who on the staff should or shouldn’t receive consideration moving forward, if any.  Fortunately, those decisions are up to the new HC.  



     

    • Upvote 1
×
×
  • Create New...