Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

dmksioux

Members
  • Posts

    2,838
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by dmksioux

  1. 56 minutes ago, SIOUXFAN97 said:

    the st johns block "project" is four years in the making....

    Sounds like a different project.

    The project at the university isn’t in a city “Ren Zone,” and an earlier developer already used that tax incentive at St. John’s Block, which leaves only the Townhouse project with the Renaissance Zone option.

  2. 51 minutes ago, BarnWinterSportsEngelstad said:

    I took these pics standing in parking lot of GC Bank - 501 Demers Ave GF

    Accross DeMers Ave, Hugo's will be on main floor. Offices and appartments above.

    IMG_20201021_122910377_HDR.jpg



    “Happy” Harry Gershman opened the Central Package Store in downtown Grand Forks in 1944.
    Later moved to Hwy#2 accross from the GF County Fairgrounds entrance, were Hal eventually took over from hid dad in 1977.

    Happy-Harry-OLD-Building.jpg

    this pic from Happy Harry's web sight corner of 5th and Demers.

     

    IMG_20201021_122913993.jpg
    New Steak house/restaurant in back ground covered in poly. On original site of Happy Harrys

    Has anyone seen a rendering of the new restaurant?  Curious what all the work on the roof is for? If I had to guess, I would say they are raising the ceiling vs building a patio, but it's tough to know for sure. 

  3. 1 hour ago, The Sicatoka said:

    ... on his own time.

    I'm all for that. 

    Exactly what I said in the original post.  Do it on your own time.  You start wearing BLM (a marxist organization) on your shoes during a game or protesting by kneeling for the national anthem, put out a promo video for BLM, I lose interest.  

    We already have a thread devoted to this so hopefully we get back on topic.  

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 1
  4. 3 hours ago, 1972 said:

    i agree with all except the wearing of the mask.  your cloth face covering is worse than useless in trying to protect your self from the virus.

    Agreed, type of mask used also makes a huge difference, as well as how you "wear" said mask.

    Bottom line, avoid large crowds, limit your interactions, socially distance when you do interact and you will be just fine.  Masks have little effect on the transmission, unless you have the appropriate mask and are wearing it correctly.  

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 2
  5. 1 minute ago, Bison06 said:

    You're logic would only follow if people were somehow forced to interact with others. In 2020, if you want to never be in the same room as another human, you don't have to.

    If you're scared or believe you are at risk due to pre-existing conditions the don't go. Let the rest of us live our lives and decide what our own risk tolerance is.

    Exactly.  Walking by someone, who is infected and not wearing a mask, is very low risk for transmission.  Especially if you are wearing a mask yourself.  Transmission is based on proximity to an infected person and length of time spent in close proximity to that person.  

    • Upvote 1
  6. 22 minutes ago, UNDlaw80 said:

     

    Quit exaggerating.

    When the idiots focus their rioting attention at federal buildings, these buildings end up being protected for the most part.   I mean ‘evil left-wing’ Gov. Evers called up the national guard days ago. All gov. buildings are protected in Kenosha.  Violence is almost always focused inward (businesses and cars burned).  

     

     

    Unfortunately it was three days too late.

    • Upvote 1
  7. 1 hour ago, Sioux>Bison said:

    And the liberals blame white nationalists for sparking this looting........ I couldn’t see any of them in the videos though........

    thank you liberals for letting Trump back in the election! This anarchy will help Trump win 4 more years!

    IMO, only if he does something and the sooner the better.  He has the ability invoke the Insurrection Act.  And if we aren't at that point already, we soon will be.  Tough time to do leading up to an election though.  

  8. Just now, Redneksioux said:

    There's a big difference between defending your property and pointing guns at people that showed no intention of even stepping foot on your property. 

    The "mob" was beating their chest to show power by marching in an area they had no business being in.  The property owners were returning the favor, letting them know what would happen, should they turn their "peaceful protest" into looting/property damage.  So it's ok for them to march on private property illegaly but it's not ok for someone to show they will defend that property, should the protest get out of line?  Ok, got it.   

    • Upvote 1
  9. 12 minutes ago, UNDlaw80 said:

     

    Well, yea.  The 'law and order' schtick is what the GOP is putting front and center; they have little else to run on so they need to exaggerate threats.  Not that the Dems aren't exaggerating the Covid threat too.   

    That said, this country is a current disaster.  I doubt the "Vote Biden and the darkies will burn your house down" rhetoric will be enough to win.  We'll see though.          

     

     

      

    https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2020/white_house_watch_aug26

  10. 37 minutes ago, Redneksioux said:

    I’m all for defending and upholding the 2nd amendment as I’m sure you are as well.

     

    You really think putting these two front and center is going to help that cause?

    Yes, I think it will play very well to Americans who are sick and tired of the looting and lawlessness being allowed in democratic run cities.  Enough is enough and many Americans are beginning to help law enforcement defend their property and businesses. Many examples of this going on.  

    • Upvote 1
  11. 23 minutes ago, nodak651 said:

    "Take their party back" 

    Have you seen his approval rating within the party?

    The will of the people is why Trump beat out 20 something primary candidates last year.  Of course RINOS and career politicians have been upset about him.  Good.  Pretty sure we heard pretty much this same story line from 4 years ago as well though, no?  

    This.  Donald is not a politician by trade, which is why both sides do not like him.  He is a business man first.  He is far from perfect and should stay away from twitter.  But, with the legislation he's signed, he at least is looking out for the best interests of Americans and American interests.  Prior to Trump being elected, there used to be a lot of chatter about getting a President who wasn't a politician, someone who would get things done instead of worry about partisan politics.  Like him it or not, that is what Trump is and why many people gravitate to him.  

    • Upvote 5
    • Downvote 2
  12. 2 minutes ago, Redneksioux said:

    You are looking at this from one side. If they were sitting down to eat, why did they have signs and wearing pro-Trump stuff outside the DNC HQ. Not saying they were breaking any laws, but they also were looking for trouble. And the parents were involving their kids as well. After the hat and signs were taken (you're a better expert than I whether or not this was assault than I) they followed these girls and literally chased them down, egging the kids on to get their stuff back.

     

    To me it looks like they were looking for a fight and both sides were in the wrong. But I don't work in law enforcement, you do, so you get to decide who goes to jail here.

    If that’s the case, will you admit the “peaceful protesters” are also looking to fight, not protest?

    • Upvote 1
  13. 36 minutes ago, BarnWinterSportsEngelstad said:

    So the President is upsetting politicians on both sides of the aisle.  Maybe it's because he's doing the job based on what needs to be accomplished and not playing partisan politics? 

    • Upvote 3
×
×
  • Create New...