Goon Posted December 30, 2001 Posted December 30, 2001 Here it is were up to 20th, I do believe we are better than some of the weak teams that are ahead of us...2001-2002 Division I Men Pairwise Rankings (PWR) Rk Team GP W- L- T Win% Rk RPI Rk PWR 1 St. Cloud 20 17- 2- 1 0.8750 2 | 0.6556 1 | 31 2 Denver 17 15- 2- 0 0.8824 1 | 0.6482 2 | 30 3 UMass-Lowell 15 13- 2- 0 0.8667 3 | 0.6432 3 | 29 4 Minnesota 19 14- 2- 3 0.8158 4 | 0.6386 4 | 28 5 New Hampshire 18 13- 3- 2 0.7778 5 | 0.6336 5 | 27 6 Boston Univer 16 11- 4- 1 0.7188 7 | 0.6135 6 | 26 7 Cornell 12 8- 3- 1 0.7083 9 | 0.6017 7 | 25 8 Michigan State 19 13- 4- 2 0.7368 6 | 0.5974 8 | 24 9 Michigan 20 11- 6- 3 0.6250 10 | 0.5830 9 | 23 10 C. C. 18 9- 7- 2 0.5556 20 | 0.5818 10 | 21 11 WMU 20 11- 6- 3 0.6250 10 | 0.5608 13 | 21 12 Maine 16 8- 5- 3 0.5938 16 | 0.5795 11 | 20 13 B.C. 18 10- 6- 2 0.6111 14 | 0.5626 12| 20 14 NMU 17 10- 6- 1 0.6176 13 | 0.5460 16 | 17 15 A-Fairbanks 18 11- 7- 0 0.6111 14 | 0.5505 14 | 16 16 UNO 20 10- 8- 2 0.5500 22 | 0.5475 15 | 16 17 Niagara 16 10- 6- 0 0.6250 10 | 0.5307 19 |16 18 Ohio State 16 9- 6- 1 0.5938 16 | 0.5350 17 | 15 19 Rensselaer 12 6- 5- 1 0.5417 23 | 0.5059 25 | 2 20 North Dakota 19 9- 9- 1 0.5000 26 | 0.5129 20 | 11 Quote
sprig Posted December 30, 2001 Posted December 30, 2001 The poorest winning percentage is what has us below those teams that may not be as good. That will change if we are better, but we have to get above .500 to move up. Need at least a split at Mn to avoid dropping off the list again. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.