Jump to content
SiouxSports.com Forum

Dustin

Members
  • Posts

    3,211
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by Dustin

  1. 3 minutes ago, Kevin G said:

    @Clark17, is there a reason they're not just going with a regulation 85' rink width? (It seems weird that universities can just pick an arbitrary width, like Wisco's 97'.)

    I would assume that, in both cases, they are fitting their design into existing constraints.  The Kohl Center is not just a hockey facility.  For Mariucci, it is purely a hockey facility, but they're modifying from an existing footprint.  Have to take into consideration seating, sightlines, etc.  I'm guessing the NCAA has a standard that a hockey ice sheet must conform to with certain dimensions being flexible within a range (like width) and others fixed (like goal crease, etc).

    • Upvote 1
  2. 21 minutes ago, MafiaMan said:

    SCSU is ripe for the picking and Denver will be playing not to get hurt on Saturday.  I’m sayin’ there’s a chance.  

    Yup.  I like our draw of St. Cloud.  Better than UMD.  And, what are the chances that Denver beats us five times in a row?

    • Upvote 1
  3. 4 minutes ago, siouxkid12 said:

    You're cherry picking again. 

    NCAA tournament appearances: UND 34 MICH 40

    Frozen Four: UND 22 MICH 26

    NCAA Championships: UND 8 MICH 9
     

    Overall Michigan has been better.

    Ok, maybe you've convinced me.  Maybe not.  If being really dominant for a couple of eras with a huge gap between eras is what you like, I definitely see your point.  I am not going to argue that Michigan isn't one of college hockey's top-tier programs.

    My approach is to the argument is similar to yours, but slightly more inclusive of other successes.  I also weigh time between titles, championship game appearances,  conference titles (both regular and tournament) as marks of consistent success.

    The most puzzling part of your argument, to me, was: "Michigan may not have won an NCAA title but they have been pretty damn consistent since winning theirs."  Let's see.  Since 1998:

    National Championships:  UND 2, Michigan 0

    National Championship game appearances: UND 4, Michigan 1

    Frozen Fours: UND 10, Michigan 7

    NCAA appearances: UND 20, Michigan 18

    Conference Regular Season titles: UND 10, Michigan 6

    Conference Tournament titles: Michigan 8, UND 6

     

    Both teams have been very consistent, no doubt.  I still like UND's resume better.  But that's just me.

    • Upvote 3
  4. In case anyone is interpreting my comments as to the success (or not) of this particular season, thankfully, that jury is still out.  It's been less than spectacular at times (most times, actually), but certain perpetual program goals have not been eliminated yet.  That says something, too.

  5. 2 minutes ago, siouxkid12 said:

    being 18-17-2 and losing in the NCHC first round in 18-19 doesn't really "scream" winning season.

    Sure, but still interesting to me you'd advocate for Michigan.  Maybe if it were 1956 when Michigan had 6 titles and UND had none (nor even played for one.)

  6. 1 minute ago, siouxkid12 said:

    Here is your quote "Historically, stack UND up against literally any other college hockey program, no matter which metric you pick, UND will likely be better". Stop moving the goal post to fit whatever you want it to fit. If we are talking recently, then I'd say Denver and Duluth but HISTORICALLY (like you stated) Michigan and Denver are slightly above us.

    I'm saying both HISTORICALLY and RECENTLY, UND is better than Michigan.  RECENTLY, Denver is better than UND.  HISTORICALLY, you could argue either way between UND and Denver.  I'm arguing that HISTORICALLY UND is better because of more consistency throughout time.

  7. Just now, MafiaMan said:

    Well, since Schloss is all about “winning seasons,” Michigan clearly is in the conversation, right?  

    Considering they were not on the list he tweeted, that's a hard "NO" in my opinion.  Losing season as recently as 2018-19. 

  8. 2 minutes ago, siouxkid12 said:

    Michigan may not have won an NCAA title but they have been pretty damn consistent since winning theirs.

    So, since 1998, you'd choose Michigan's success over UND's??  Just trying to see where you're coming from here.

  9. 1 minute ago, siouxkid12 said:

    Michigan, Denver are two programs that are better than us.

    Because they have more natties?  How would you like a title drought of 35 years (Denver) or 32 years (Michigan)? Not exactly the gold standard of consistency.

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 1
  10. Basically everyone wants it all - winning seasons, home playoff games, conference championships, national championships.  Every year.  While on paper it seems all that should be achievable perpetually, reality doesn't work like paper.  That's what makes sports fun - play the game and see what happens.  Historically, stack UND up against literally any other college hockey program, no matter which metric you pick, UND will likely be better.

    • Upvote 2
  11. If UND does pull it off to win the NCHC, which #1 seed is going to be up in arms that they are sent to the state of North Dakota to play the University of North Dakota?  I can't imagine that going over well for any of the current projected #1 seeds.  Probably end up in some sort rule/format change if that were to happen :huh:  We seem to be good at being put into situations that demonstrate flaws in the system.  And not just in hockey.

×
×
  • Create New...